Gender dynamics of the impact of cash transfer on female educational expenditure of informal settlements in Bangladesh

IF 2.2 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
MD. Abdul Bari , Ghulam Dastgir Khan , Mari Katayanagi , Yuichiro Yoshida
{"title":"Gender dynamics of the impact of cash transfer on female educational expenditure of informal settlements in Bangladesh","authors":"MD. Abdul Bari ,&nbsp;Ghulam Dastgir Khan ,&nbsp;Mari Katayanagi ,&nbsp;Yuichiro Yoshida","doi":"10.1016/j.wdp.2024.100591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gender-biased educational investment remains a critical issue for vulnerable households. Despite increased female enrolment in the past decade, motivation to invest on female education remains low. Resource scarcity and low woman empowerment are two major reasons of low educational expenditure on female children of a vulnerable household. As the most vulnerable households in a society, informal settlers (slum households) are supposed to spend less on female children. However, whether there is any gender bias in informally settled households’ spending on education remains a question. Further, Cash Transfer (CT) programs provide resources to vulnerable households for investing on human capital elements like education. This study aims to examine three research questions: whether a informally settled household’s spending on education is gender biased, whether the households in which women receive CT spend more for female education than those in which women do not receive CT, and finally whether the impact of female receipt of CT differs from that of male receipt of CT in terms of female education expenditure. As the assignment of female access to CT is not randomized, the simple comparison between the treated and untreated suffers from selection bias. We employ propensity score matching (PSM) as an identification strategy to address selection bias. Inverse probability weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA) has been applied as a robustness check. The study's policy implications highlight the significance for policymakers in the domains of women's education, empowerment, and the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37831,"journal":{"name":"World Development Perspectives","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292924000286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender-biased educational investment remains a critical issue for vulnerable households. Despite increased female enrolment in the past decade, motivation to invest on female education remains low. Resource scarcity and low woman empowerment are two major reasons of low educational expenditure on female children of a vulnerable household. As the most vulnerable households in a society, informal settlers (slum households) are supposed to spend less on female children. However, whether there is any gender bias in informally settled households’ spending on education remains a question. Further, Cash Transfer (CT) programs provide resources to vulnerable households for investing on human capital elements like education. This study aims to examine three research questions: whether a informally settled household’s spending on education is gender biased, whether the households in which women receive CT spend more for female education than those in which women do not receive CT, and finally whether the impact of female receipt of CT differs from that of male receipt of CT in terms of female education expenditure. As the assignment of female access to CT is not randomized, the simple comparison between the treated and untreated suffers from selection bias. We employ propensity score matching (PSM) as an identification strategy to address selection bias. Inverse probability weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA) has been applied as a robustness check. The study's policy implications highlight the significance for policymakers in the domains of women's education, empowerment, and the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals.

现金转移对孟加拉国非正规住区女性教育支出影响的性别动态变化
对弱势家庭而言,有性别偏见的教育投资仍是一个关键问题。尽管过去十年女性入学率有所提高,但对女性教育投资的积极性仍然很低。资源匮乏和妇女赋权程度低是弱势家庭女性子女教育支出低的两个主要原因。作为社会中最弱势的家庭,非正规定居者(贫民窟家庭)在女性子女身上的支出理应较少。然而,非正规定居家庭在教育支出方面是否存在性别偏见仍是一个问题。此外,现金转移项目(CT)为弱势家庭提供资源,用于投资教育等人力资本要素。本研究旨在探讨三个研究问题:非正规定居家庭的教育支出是否存在性别偏差;与未接受现金转移支付的家庭相比,接受现金转移支付的女性家庭在女性教育方面的支出是否更高;最后,就女性教育支出而言,女性接受现金转移支付与男性接受现金转移支付的影响是否不同。由于女性接受 "有条件者评估 "的分配不是随机的,因此简单比较接受评估者和未接受评估者会出现选择偏差。我们采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)作为识别策略来解决选择偏差问题。作为稳健性检查,还采用了反概率加权回归调整(IPWRA)。本研究的政策影响强调了政策制定者在妇女教育、赋权和实现可持续发展目标等领域的重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Development Perspectives
World Development Perspectives Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: World Development Perspectives is a multi-disciplinary journal of international development. It seeks to explore ways of improving human well-being by examining the performance and impact of interventions designed to address issues related to: poverty alleviation, public health and malnutrition, agricultural production, natural resource governance, globalization and transnational processes, technological progress, gender and social discrimination, and participation in economic and political life. Above all, we are particularly interested in the role of historical, legal, social, economic, political, biophysical, and/or ecological contexts in shaping development processes and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信