Influence of musculoskeletal injury history on countermovement jump performance in rugby players

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Luiz Alexandre Pacheco, Matheus Correa Morais, José Davi Oltramari, William Dhein
{"title":"Influence of musculoskeletal injury history on countermovement jump performance in rugby players","authors":"Luiz Alexandre Pacheco,&nbsp;Matheus Correa Morais,&nbsp;José Davi Oltramari,&nbsp;William Dhein","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine whether musculoskeletal injury history is a factor that influences countermovement jump (CMJ) performance in rugby players and to compare CMJ performance between player's position (forwards or backs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty rugby players (15 with an injury history and 15 without an injury history) performed the CMJ using an inertial sensor (Baiobit®) to evaluate kinematic (Jump Height, Velocity and Phase duration) and kinetic data (rate of force development [RFD], impact peak [IP], take-off force and Stiffness]. The group comparison was performed with an independent <em>t</em>-test, and the association between CMJ performance, sociodemographic variables and injury history was investigated with Pearson's correlation test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Rugby players with and without history of musculoskeletal injury differed in age and playing experience, but there was no difference in CMJ performance between groups. Jump height of uninjured players was positively correlated with take-off force and RFD and negatively correlated with concentric phase duration and RFD. Injured players demonstrated a negative correlation between take-off force and IP. Compared to backs, forwards were heavier and taller, showed greater IPs and were more likely to have an injury history.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There were no differences in CMJ performance between rugby players with and without an injury history. Forwards showed greater IPs and were more likelier to have an injury history than backs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224002468","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine whether musculoskeletal injury history is a factor that influences countermovement jump (CMJ) performance in rugby players and to compare CMJ performance between player's position (forwards or backs).

Methods

Thirty rugby players (15 with an injury history and 15 without an injury history) performed the CMJ using an inertial sensor (Baiobit®) to evaluate kinematic (Jump Height, Velocity and Phase duration) and kinetic data (rate of force development [RFD], impact peak [IP], take-off force and Stiffness]. The group comparison was performed with an independent t-test, and the association between CMJ performance, sociodemographic variables and injury history was investigated with Pearson's correlation test.

Results

Rugby players with and without history of musculoskeletal injury differed in age and playing experience, but there was no difference in CMJ performance between groups. Jump height of uninjured players was positively correlated with take-off force and RFD and negatively correlated with concentric phase duration and RFD. Injured players demonstrated a negative correlation between take-off force and IP. Compared to backs, forwards were heavier and taller, showed greater IPs and were more likely to have an injury history.

Conclusions

There were no differences in CMJ performance between rugby players with and without an injury history. Forwards showed greater IPs and were more likelier to have an injury history than backs.

肌肉骨骼受伤史对橄榄球运动员反向运动跳跃成绩的影响
目的研究肌肉骨骼受伤史是否是影响橄榄球运动员反向运动跳跃(CMJ)成绩的因素,并比较不同位置(前锋或后卫)的橄榄球运动员的 CMJ 成绩。方法30 名橄榄球运动员(15 人有受伤史,15 人无受伤史)使用惯性传感器(Baiobit®)进行 CMJ,以评估运动学数据(跳跃高度、速度和阶段持续时间)和动力学数据(力量发展速率 [RFD]、冲击峰值 [IP]、起飞力和硬度)。结果有和无肌肉骨骼损伤史的橄榄球运动员在年龄和比赛经验方面存在差异,但各组之间的 CMJ 性能没有差异。未受伤球员的跳跃高度与起跳力和RFD呈正相关,与同心阶段持续时间和RFD呈负相关。受伤球员的起跳力和IP呈负相关。与后卫相比,前锋更重、更高,表现出更大的 IP 值,并且更有可能有受伤史。与后卫相比,前锋的 IP 值更大,更容易受伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信