In Which Cases Do We Operate? Posterior Malleolar Fractures-Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Bartoníček/Rammelt Classification and Corresponding Surgery Rates.

Michael Sarter, Felix Krane, Tim Leschinger, Michael Hackl, Lars P Müller, Andreas Harbrecht
{"title":"In Which Cases Do We Operate? Posterior Malleolar Fractures-Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Bartoníček/Rammelt Classification and Corresponding Surgery Rates.","authors":"Michael Sarter, Felix Krane, Tim Leschinger, Michael Hackl, Lars P Müller, Andreas Harbrecht","doi":"10.1177/19386400241250154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Bartoníček/Rammelt classification is established for posterior malleolar fractures. It subdivides the fractures into 5 types and outlines treatment recommendations. This study aims to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Bartoníček/Rammelt classification and investigates its applicability regarding treatment recommendations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) scans of 80 ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fracture were analyzed by four observers at two different time points 30 days apart (d1 and d2). Intrarater and interrater reliability was measured using kappa values. The corresponding surgery rates of the fracture subtypes were analyzed, and the surgery rates were correlated with fragment sizes and displacements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A moderate interobserver reliability for d1 0.41 (CI 0.35-0.47) and d2 0.42 (CI 0.36-0.48) was detected. Intraobserver reliability was documented as perfect, with a mean kappa of 0.83. Type II fractures were operated on in 50% of cases. In 50% of type II cases, a nonoperative treatment was chosen. Fragment size correlated strongly with the chosen therapy, and osteosynthesis was performed significantly more often when the fragment size exceeded 3 cm<sup>3</sup> (P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Bartoníček/Rammelt classification system showed moderate interobserver reliability and perfect to substantial intraobserver reliability. In clinical practice of this study cohort, the size of the posterior malleolar fragment rather than the dislocation and joint impaction seemed to have the decision to operate on type II or III fractures. Existing treatment recommendations based on the Bartoníček/Rammelt classification correspond to the therapy algorithm carried out in this cohort of patients.<b>Levels of Evidence:</b> Level III: Retrospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400241250154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Bartoníček/Rammelt classification is established for posterior malleolar fractures. It subdivides the fractures into 5 types and outlines treatment recommendations. This study aims to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Bartoníček/Rammelt classification and investigates its applicability regarding treatment recommendations.

Materials and methods: Computed tomography (CT) scans of 80 ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fracture were analyzed by four observers at two different time points 30 days apart (d1 and d2). Intrarater and interrater reliability was measured using kappa values. The corresponding surgery rates of the fracture subtypes were analyzed, and the surgery rates were correlated with fragment sizes and displacements.

Results: A moderate interobserver reliability for d1 0.41 (CI 0.35-0.47) and d2 0.42 (CI 0.36-0.48) was detected. Intraobserver reliability was documented as perfect, with a mean kappa of 0.83. Type II fractures were operated on in 50% of cases. In 50% of type II cases, a nonoperative treatment was chosen. Fragment size correlated strongly with the chosen therapy, and osteosynthesis was performed significantly more often when the fragment size exceeded 3 cm3 (P < .01).

Conclusions: The Bartoníček/Rammelt classification system showed moderate interobserver reliability and perfect to substantial intraobserver reliability. In clinical practice of this study cohort, the size of the posterior malleolar fragment rather than the dislocation and joint impaction seemed to have the decision to operate on type II or III fractures. Existing treatment recommendations based on the Bartoníček/Rammelt classification correspond to the therapy algorithm carried out in this cohort of patients.Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective study.

哪些病例需要手术?耳后骨折--Bartoníček/Rammelt分类的观察者内和观察者间可靠性及相应的手术率。
导言:Bartoníček/Rammelt分类法是针对踝后骨折而制定的。它将骨折细分为 5 种类型,并概述了治疗建议。本研究旨在确定Bartoníček/Rammelt分类法在观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性,并调查其在治疗建议方面的适用性:由四名观察者在两个不同的时间点(d1 和 d2)对 80 例踝后臼齿骨折的计算机断层扫描(CT)进行分析,两个时间点相距 30 天。观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性采用卡帕值进行测量。对骨折亚型的相应手术率进行了分析,并将手术率与骨折片大小和移位相关联:结果:观察者间的可靠性为:d1 0.41(CI 0.35-0.47),d2 0.42(CI 0.36-0.48)。观察者内部的可靠性为完美,平均卡帕值为 0.83。50%的 II 型骨折病例接受了手术治疗。50%的II型骨折病例选择了非手术治疗。骨折片大小与选择的治疗方法密切相关,当骨折片大小超过 3 cm3 时,骨合成术的应用率明显更高(P < .01):结论:Bartoníček/Rammelt分类系统显示出中等程度的观察者间可靠性和完美至相当程度的观察者内可靠性。在该研究队列的临床实践中,决定对 II 型或 III 型骨折进行手术的因素似乎是后臼骨碎片的大小,而非脱位和关节嵌顿。基于Bartoníček/Rammelt分类法的现有治疗建议与该组患者的治疗算法相符:三级:回顾性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信