Addressing Barriers to Timely Orthopaedic Follow-up for Foot and Ankle Fractures After Emergency Department Visits.

Parimal Rana, Jane Brennan, Andrea Johnson, Caroline Donegan, Jake Gelfand, Adrienne Spirt, David Keblish, Justin Turcotte, Elizabeth Friedmann
{"title":"Addressing Barriers to Timely Orthopaedic Follow-up for Foot and Ankle Fractures After Emergency Department Visits.","authors":"Parimal Rana, Jane Brennan, Andrea Johnson, Caroline Donegan, Jake Gelfand, Adrienne Spirt, David Keblish, Justin Turcotte, Elizabeth Friedmann","doi":"10.1177/19386400241249807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Foot and ankle fractures present common challenges in emergency departments, warranting careful follow-up protocols for optimal patient outcomes. This study investigates the predictors of orthopaedic follow-up for these injuries after an emergency department (ED) visit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study of 1450 patients seen in the ED with foot or ankle fractures from July 2015 to February 2023 was conducted. All included patients were discharged with instructions to follow-up with an orthopaedic provider. Demographic data, fracture details, and follow-up patterns were extracted from medical records. Social vulnerability was assessed using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of follow-up. A subgroup analysis comparing patients who followed up >7 days from ED presentation (ie, delayed follow-up) to those who followed up within 7 days of presentation was then performed. Statistical significance was assessed at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 974/1450 (67.2%) patients followed up with orthopaedics at an average time of 4.16 days. After risk adjustment, Medicaid coverage (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56, P = .018), increased overall social vulnerability (OR = 0.83, P = .032), and increased vulnerability across the dimensions of socioeconomic status (P = .002), household characteristics (P = .034), racial and ethnic minority status (P = .007), and household type and transportation (P = .032) were all associated with lower odds of follow-up. Phalangeal fractures were also associated with decreased odds of follow-up (OR = 0.039, P < .001), whereas ankle fractures were more likely to follow-up (OR = 1.52, P = .002). In the subgroup analysis, patients of older age (P = .008), non-white race (P = .024), motor vehicle accident (MVA) (P = .027) or non-private insurance (P = .027), those experiencing phalangeal fractures (P = .015), and those seen by an orthopaedic provider in the ED (P = .006) were more likely to present with delayed follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with increased social vulnerability and Medicaid insurance are less likely to seek follow-up care after presentation to the ED with foot and ankle fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400241249807"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400241249807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Foot and ankle fractures present common challenges in emergency departments, warranting careful follow-up protocols for optimal patient outcomes. This study investigates the predictors of orthopaedic follow-up for these injuries after an emergency department (ED) visit.

Methods: A retrospective observational study of 1450 patients seen in the ED with foot or ankle fractures from July 2015 to February 2023 was conducted. All included patients were discharged with instructions to follow-up with an orthopaedic provider. Demographic data, fracture details, and follow-up patterns were extracted from medical records. Social vulnerability was assessed using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of follow-up. A subgroup analysis comparing patients who followed up >7 days from ED presentation (ie, delayed follow-up) to those who followed up within 7 days of presentation was then performed. Statistical significance was assessed at P < .05.

Results: Overall, 974/1450 (67.2%) patients followed up with orthopaedics at an average time of 4.16 days. After risk adjustment, Medicaid coverage (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56, P = .018), increased overall social vulnerability (OR = 0.83, P = .032), and increased vulnerability across the dimensions of socioeconomic status (P = .002), household characteristics (P = .034), racial and ethnic minority status (P = .007), and household type and transportation (P = .032) were all associated with lower odds of follow-up. Phalangeal fractures were also associated with decreased odds of follow-up (OR = 0.039, P < .001), whereas ankle fractures were more likely to follow-up (OR = 1.52, P = .002). In the subgroup analysis, patients of older age (P = .008), non-white race (P = .024), motor vehicle accident (MVA) (P = .027) or non-private insurance (P = .027), those experiencing phalangeal fractures (P = .015), and those seen by an orthopaedic provider in the ED (P = .006) were more likely to present with delayed follow-up.

Conclusion: Patients with increased social vulnerability and Medicaid insurance are less likely to seek follow-up care after presentation to the ED with foot and ankle fractures.

解决急诊科就诊后及时进行足踝骨折矫形随访的障碍。
导言:足部和踝部骨折是急诊科常见的难题,需要仔细制定后续治疗方案,以优化患者的治疗效果。本研究调查了急诊科就诊后骨科随访这些损伤的预测因素:本研究对 2015 年 7 月至 2023 年 2 月期间在急诊科就诊的 1450 名足部或踝部骨折患者进行了回顾性观察研究。所有纳入研究的患者均已出院,出院时均要求骨科医生进行随访。从医疗记录中提取了人口统计学数据、骨折细节和随访模式。社会脆弱性采用美国疾病控制中心(CDC)的社会脆弱性指数进行评估。进行了单变量和多变量分析,以确定随访的预测因素。然后进行了一项亚组分析,将从急诊室就诊后 7 天内进行随访的患者(即延迟随访)与就诊后 7 天内进行随访的患者进行比较。统计显著性以 P < .05 为标准:总体而言,974/1450(67.2%)名患者接受了骨科随访,平均时间为 4.16 天。经过风险调整后,医疗补助覆盖率(几率比 [OR] = 0.56,P = .018)、整体社会脆弱性增加(OR = 0.83,P = .032)以及社会经济地位(P = .002)、家庭特征(P = .034)、种族和少数民族地位(P = .007)、家庭类型和交通(P = .032)等方面的脆弱性增加都与随访几率降低有关。趾骨骨折也与随访几率降低有关(OR = 0.039,P < .001),而踝骨骨折的随访几率更高(OR = 1.52,P = .002)。在亚组分析中,年龄较大(P = .008)、非白人种族(P = .024)、机动车事故(MVA)(P = .027)或非私人保险(P = .027)、发生趾骨骨折(P = .015)以及在急诊室由骨科医生诊治(P = .006)的患者更有可能出现随访延迟:结论:社会脆弱性增加和拥有医疗补助保险的患者在因足踝骨折就诊急诊室后寻求后续治疗的可能性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信