The role of loneliness and social isolation in mediating the relationship between childhood maltreatment and schizophrenia: A genetically informed approach.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of psychopathology and clinical science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1037/abn0000902
Georgia Zavitsanou, Lucy H Waldren, Esther Walton, Vilte Baltramonaityte
{"title":"The role of loneliness and social isolation in mediating the relationship between childhood maltreatment and schizophrenia: A genetically informed approach.","authors":"Georgia Zavitsanou, Lucy H Waldren, Esther Walton, Vilte Baltramonaityte","doi":"10.1037/abn0000902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Observational studies have found loneliness and social isolation to mediate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and schizophrenia. Limitations with observational studies (e.g., confounding and reverse causation), however, have meant the robustness of these relationships has thus far not been explored. To address this gap, the current study utilized genomic structural equation modeling (genomic SEM) and Mendelian randomization (MR) to perform a genetic mediation analysis between childhood maltreatment, loneliness/isolation, and schizophrenia, using summary statistics from three genome-wide association studies (sample sizes 105,318-487,647). While we observed a putative effect of both childhood maltreatment (inverse variance weighted <i>OR</i> = 3.44 per standard deviation increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.66-7.13], <i>p</i> < .001) and loneliness/isolation (<i>OR</i> = 2.98, 95% CI [1.37-6.46], <i>p</i> = .006) on schizophrenia, our hypothesis that loneliness/isolation would mediate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and schizophrenia was not supported (genomic SEM indirect effect = -0.05, <i>SE</i> = 0.05, <i>p</i> = .255; MR indirect effect = 0.10, <i>SE</i> = 0.11, p = .369). Furthermore, reverse mediation analysis indicated that the effect may be in the opposite direction (genomic SEM indirect effect = 0.11, <i>SE</i> = 0.02, <i>p</i> < .001; MR indirect effect = 0.01, <i>SE</i> = 0.00, <i>p</i> < .001), accounting for 20.3%-28.9% of the total effect. The current results suggest that intervening in loneliness/isolation in individuals with a history of childhood maltreatment is unlikely to reduce schizophrenia risk. On the contrary, targeting loneliness/isolation in individuals with a genetic predisposition toward schizophrenia may diminish childhood maltreatment risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":"392-402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observational studies have found loneliness and social isolation to mediate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and schizophrenia. Limitations with observational studies (e.g., confounding and reverse causation), however, have meant the robustness of these relationships has thus far not been explored. To address this gap, the current study utilized genomic structural equation modeling (genomic SEM) and Mendelian randomization (MR) to perform a genetic mediation analysis between childhood maltreatment, loneliness/isolation, and schizophrenia, using summary statistics from three genome-wide association studies (sample sizes 105,318-487,647). While we observed a putative effect of both childhood maltreatment (inverse variance weighted OR = 3.44 per standard deviation increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.66-7.13], p < .001) and loneliness/isolation (OR = 2.98, 95% CI [1.37-6.46], p = .006) on schizophrenia, our hypothesis that loneliness/isolation would mediate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and schizophrenia was not supported (genomic SEM indirect effect = -0.05, SE = 0.05, p = .255; MR indirect effect = 0.10, SE = 0.11, p = .369). Furthermore, reverse mediation analysis indicated that the effect may be in the opposite direction (genomic SEM indirect effect = 0.11, SE = 0.02, p < .001; MR indirect effect = 0.01, SE = 0.00, p < .001), accounting for 20.3%-28.9% of the total effect. The current results suggest that intervening in loneliness/isolation in individuals with a history of childhood maltreatment is unlikely to reduce schizophrenia risk. On the contrary, targeting loneliness/isolation in individuals with a genetic predisposition toward schizophrenia may diminish childhood maltreatment risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

孤独和社会隔离在调解童年虐待与精神分裂症之间关系中的作用:遗传学方法
观察性研究发现,孤独和社会隔离是童年虐待与精神分裂症之间关系的中介。然而,观察性研究的局限性(如混杂和反向因果关系)意味着这些关系的稳健性迄今尚未得到探讨。为了弥补这一不足,本研究利用基因组结构方程建模(genomic structural equation modeling,简称SEM)和孟德尔随机化(Mendelian randomization,简称MR)技术,使用三项全基因组关联研究(样本量为105,318-487,647)的汇总统计数据,对童年虐待、孤独/隔离和精神分裂症之间的遗传中介关系进行了分析。虽然我们观察到童年虐待(每增加一个标准差,逆方差加权 OR = 3.44,95% 置信区间 [CI] [1.66-7.13],p < .001)和孤独/孤立(OR = 2.98,95% CI [1.37-6.46],p = .我们的假设是孤独/隔离会对儿童虐待与精神分裂症之间的关系起到中介作用,但这一假设并未得到支持(基因组 SEM 间接效应 = -0.05,SE = 0.05,p = .255;MR 间接效应 = 0.10,SE = 0.11,p = .369)。此外,反向中介分析表明,效果可能是反向的(基因组 SEM 间接效果 = 0.11,SE = 0.02,p < .001;MR 间接效果 = 0.01,SE = 0.00,p < .001),占总效果的 20.3%-28.9%。目前的结果表明,对有童年虐待史的人进行孤独/隔离干预不太可能降低精神分裂症的风险。相反,针对有精神分裂症遗传倾向的个体进行孤独/孤立干预可能会降低童年虐待风险。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信