Relation between nutritional status on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients: emphasizing nutritional screening tools in a prospective cohort investigation.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Omid Moradi Moghaddam, Masoumeh Hosseinzadeh Emam, Pardis Irandoost, Mahdi Hejazi, Zeinab Iraji, Leila Yazdanpanah, Seyedeh Farnaz Mirhosseini, Abolfazl Mollajan, Mohammad Niakan Lahiji
{"title":"Relation between nutritional status on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients: emphasizing nutritional screening tools in a prospective cohort investigation.","authors":"Omid Moradi Moghaddam, Masoumeh Hosseinzadeh Emam, Pardis Irandoost, Mahdi Hejazi, Zeinab Iraji, Leila Yazdanpanah, Seyedeh Farnaz Mirhosseini, Abolfazl Mollajan, Mohammad Niakan Lahiji","doi":"10.1186/s40795-024-00869-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition is a significant concern reported in adult critically ill patients, yet there is no gold standard to assess nutritional status in this population. This study examines the association between nutritional status and clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients using nutritional risk assessment tools and aims to look for the best tool.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a single-center prospective cohort study among 165 patients, the predictive performance of high or low malnutrition risk assessed by Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS), Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (m-NUTRIC), Mini-Nutritional-Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF), Controlling Nutritional status (CONUT), and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) were evaluated and compared for mortality, organ failure, length of hospitalization, and mechanical ventilation (MV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Different assessment tools showed various nutritional statuses. m-NUTRIC and NRS-2002 were found to be associated more strongly relative to other tools with mortality (RR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.42-2.08) and (RR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.08-1.72), organ failure (RR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.44-1.96) and (RR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.99-1.48), MV (RR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.65) and (RR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39) respectively. There was no correlation between malnutrition levels assessed by mentioned tools except for NRS-2002 and length of hospitalization. In predicting mortality or illness severity, the cut points were different for some tools like NUTRIC-score and all assessed outcomes (3.5), MNA-SF and mortality (6.5), CONUT with mortality, and MV (6.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A considerable proportion of patients admitted to the ICU are at high risk for malnutrition. Compared to other tools, m-NUTRIC and NRS-2002 proved superior in predicting clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Other tools overestimated the risk of malnutrition in the ICU so couldn't predict clinical outcomes correctly.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"10 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11080301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00869-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition is a significant concern reported in adult critically ill patients, yet there is no gold standard to assess nutritional status in this population. This study examines the association between nutritional status and clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients using nutritional risk assessment tools and aims to look for the best tool.

Method: In a single-center prospective cohort study among 165 patients, the predictive performance of high or low malnutrition risk assessed by Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS), Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (m-NUTRIC), Mini-Nutritional-Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF), Controlling Nutritional status (CONUT), and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) were evaluated and compared for mortality, organ failure, length of hospitalization, and mechanical ventilation (MV).

Results: Different assessment tools showed various nutritional statuses. m-NUTRIC and NRS-2002 were found to be associated more strongly relative to other tools with mortality (RR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.42-2.08) and (RR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.08-1.72), organ failure (RR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.44-1.96) and (RR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.99-1.48), MV (RR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.65) and (RR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39) respectively. There was no correlation between malnutrition levels assessed by mentioned tools except for NRS-2002 and length of hospitalization. In predicting mortality or illness severity, the cut points were different for some tools like NUTRIC-score and all assessed outcomes (3.5), MNA-SF and mortality (6.5), CONUT with mortality, and MV (6.5).

Conclusions: A considerable proportion of patients admitted to the ICU are at high risk for malnutrition. Compared to other tools, m-NUTRIC and NRS-2002 proved superior in predicting clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Other tools overestimated the risk of malnutrition in the ICU so couldn't predict clinical outcomes correctly.

营养状况与重症患者临床疗效之间的关系:在前瞻性队列调查中强调营养筛查工具。
背景:据报道,营养不良是成人重症患者的一个重要问题,但目前还没有评估该人群营养状况的黄金标准。本研究使用营养风险评估工具对重症监护病房(ICU)患者的营养状况与临床预后之间的关系进行了研究,旨在寻找最佳工具:在一项针对 165 名患者的单中心前瞻性队列研究中,通过营养风险筛查(NRS)、重症患者营养风险改良(m-NUTRIC)、迷你营养评估短表(MNA-SF)、控制营养状况(CONUT)和预后营养指数(PNI)评估高或低营养不良风险的预测性能,并对死亡率、器官衰竭、住院时间和机械通气(MV)进行比较:与其他工具相比,m-NUTRIC 和 NRS-2002 与死亡率(RR = 1.72;95% CI,1.42-2.08)和(RR = 1.37;95% CI,1.08-1.72)、器官衰竭(RR = 1.69;95% CI,1.44-1.96)和(RR = 1.22;95% CI,0.99-1.48)、MV(RR = 1.46;95% CI,1.27-1.65)和(RR = 1.21;95% CI,1.04-1.39)分别相关。除 NRS-2002 外,上述工具评估的营养不良程度与住院时间之间没有相关性。在预测死亡率或病情严重程度时,一些工具的切点是不同的,如NUTRIC-评分与所有评估结果(3.5)、MNA-SF与死亡率(6.5)、CONUT与死亡率和MV(6.5):结论:入住重症监护室的患者中有相当一部分存在营养不良的高风险。与其他工具相比,m-NUTRIC 和 NRS-2002 在预测重症患者的临床结果方面更具优势。其他工具高估了重症监护室患者营养不良的风险,因此无法正确预测临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信