Using Machine Learning and miRNA for the Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Vishnu A Aravind, Valentina L Kouznetsova, Santosh Kesari, Igor F Tsigelny
{"title":"Using Machine Learning and miRNA for the Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer.","authors":"Vishnu A Aravind, Valentina L Kouznetsova, Santosh Kesari, Igor F Tsigelny","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a global health challenge, often diagnosed at advanced stages, leading to high mortality rates. Current diagnostic tools for EC are limited in their efficacy. This study aims to harness the potential of microRNAs (miRNAs) as novel, noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for EC. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of miRNAs, particularly in distinguishing miRNAs associated with EC from control miRNAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied machine learning (ML) techniques in WEKA (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) and TensorFlow Keras to a dataset of miRNA sequences and gene targets, assessing the predictive power of several classifiers: naïve Bayes, multilayer perceptron, Hoeffding tree, random forest, and random tree. The data were further subjected to InfoGain feature selection to identify the most informative miRNA sequence and gene target descriptors. The ML models' abilities to distinguish between miRNA implicated in EC and control group miRNA was then tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the tested WEKA classifiers, the top 3 performing ones were random forest, Hoeffding tree, and naïve Bayes. The TensorFlow Keras neural network model was subsequently trained and tested, the model's predictive power was further validated using an independent dataset. The TensorFlow Keras gave an accuracy 0.91. The WEKA best algorithm (naïve Bayes) model yielded an accuracy of 0.94.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrate the potential of ML-based miRNA classifiers in diagnosing EC. However, further studies are necessary to validate these findings and explore the full clinical potential of this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a global health challenge, often diagnosed at advanced stages, leading to high mortality rates. Current diagnostic tools for EC are limited in their efficacy. This study aims to harness the potential of microRNAs (miRNAs) as novel, noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for EC. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of miRNAs, particularly in distinguishing miRNAs associated with EC from control miRNAs.

Methods: We applied machine learning (ML) techniques in WEKA (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) and TensorFlow Keras to a dataset of miRNA sequences and gene targets, assessing the predictive power of several classifiers: naïve Bayes, multilayer perceptron, Hoeffding tree, random forest, and random tree. The data were further subjected to InfoGain feature selection to identify the most informative miRNA sequence and gene target descriptors. The ML models' abilities to distinguish between miRNA implicated in EC and control group miRNA was then tested.

Results: Of the tested WEKA classifiers, the top 3 performing ones were random forest, Hoeffding tree, and naïve Bayes. The TensorFlow Keras neural network model was subsequently trained and tested, the model's predictive power was further validated using an independent dataset. The TensorFlow Keras gave an accuracy 0.91. The WEKA best algorithm (naïve Bayes) model yielded an accuracy of 0.94.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate the potential of ML-based miRNA classifiers in diagnosing EC. However, further studies are necessary to validate these findings and explore the full clinical potential of this approach.

利用机器学习和 miRNA 诊断食道癌。
背景:食管癌(EC)仍是一项全球性的健康挑战,通常在晚期才被诊断出来,死亡率很高。目前的食管癌诊断工具疗效有限。本研究旨在利用微RNA(miRNA)作为食管癌新型非侵入性诊断生物标志物的潜力。我们的目标是确定 miRNAs 的诊断准确性,尤其是在区分与心血管疾病相关的 miRNAs 和对照 miRNAs 方面:我们将WEKA(Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis)和TensorFlow Keras中的机器学习(ML)技术应用于miRNA序列和基因靶标数据集,评估了几种分类器的预测能力:天真贝叶斯、多层感知器、Hoeffding树、随机森林和随机树。数据进一步经过 InfoGain 特征选择,以确定信息量最大的 miRNA 序列和基因靶标描述符。然后测试了 ML 模型区分与 EC 有关的 miRNA 和对照组 miRNA 的能力:结果:在测试的 WEKA 分类器中,表现最好的 3 个分类器分别是随机森林、Hoeffding 树和天真贝叶斯。随后对 TensorFlow Keras 神经网络模型进行了训练和测试,并使用独立数据集进一步验证了该模型的预测能力。TensorFlow Keras 的准确率为 0.91。WEKA 最佳算法(天真贝叶斯)模型的准确率为 0.94:研究结果证明了基于 ML 的 miRNA 分类器在诊断心血管疾病方面的潜力。不过,还需要进一步研究来验证这些发现,并探索这种方法的全部临床潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信