Examining Resilient Pain Behaviors for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
{"title":"Examining Resilient Pain Behaviors for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective of this scoping review was to examine resilience and resilient pain behaviors for those with CLBP in relation to resilience definitions, operationalization (e.g. trait or behavior), and application of theoretical frameworks.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This scoping review examined resilience and resilient pain behaviors for those with CLBP in relation to resilience definitions, operationalization (e.g. trait or behavior), and application of theoretical frameworks.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>To gather data, we used five databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Scopus.</p></div><div><h3>Review/Analysis methods</h3><p>Authors used a systematic data charting spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel) to review and analyze the extracted data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 26 articles, from 2011-2021, were included in the final analysis. A majority of articles were conducted in the United States (11) and cross-sectional secondary data analysis design (13). Resilience definitions varied across the studies. Three studies operationalized resilience as a trait and only one as a behavior. Most studies (20) did not include a theoretical framework.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The majority cross-sectional design and heterogeneity of a resilience definition indicates resilience research is still emerging. The lack of operationalized resilience, specifically as a behavior, and the limited use of theoretical frameworks suggest advancements in resilience pain research are needed.</p></div><div><h3>Nursing Practice Implications</h3><p>This research has implications for nursing practice to support nurse's holistic perspective and the ability to incorporate resilience within nursing care. This research provides the initial steps to developing standard resilience definitions and frameworks to guide nursing practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 417-424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this scoping review was to examine resilience and resilient pain behaviors for those with CLBP in relation to resilience definitions, operationalization (e.g. trait or behavior), and application of theoretical frameworks.

Design

This scoping review examined resilience and resilient pain behaviors for those with CLBP in relation to resilience definitions, operationalization (e.g. trait or behavior), and application of theoretical frameworks.

Data sources

To gather data, we used five databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Scopus.

Review/Analysis methods

Authors used a systematic data charting spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel) to review and analyze the extracted data.

Results

A total of 26 articles, from 2011-2021, were included in the final analysis. A majority of articles were conducted in the United States (11) and cross-sectional secondary data analysis design (13). Resilience definitions varied across the studies. Three studies operationalized resilience as a trait and only one as a behavior. Most studies (20) did not include a theoretical framework.

Conclusion

The majority cross-sectional design and heterogeneity of a resilience definition indicates resilience research is still emerging. The lack of operationalized resilience, specifically as a behavior, and the limited use of theoretical frameworks suggest advancements in resilience pain research are needed.

Nursing Practice Implications

This research has implications for nursing practice to support nurse's holistic perspective and the ability to incorporate resilience within nursing care. This research provides the initial steps to developing standard resilience definitions and frameworks to guide nursing practice.

研究慢性腰背痛的抗痛行为:范围界定综述。
目标:本范围综述的目的是根据复原力的定义、操作(如特质或行为)以及理论框架的应用,研究 CLBP 患者的复原力和复原性疼痛行为:本范围界定综述从复原力定义、可操作性(如特质或行为)以及理论框架的应用等方面研究了CLBP患者的复原力和复原性疼痛行为:为了收集数据,我们使用了五个数据库:数据来源:为了收集数据,我们使用了五个数据库:《护理及相关健康文献累积索引》(CINAHL)、Embase、Ovid MEDLINE、PsycInfo 和 Scopus:作者使用系统数据图表电子表格(Microsoft Excel)对提取的数据进行回顾和分析:最终分析共纳入了 2011-2021 年间的 26 篇文章。大部分文章在美国进行(11 篇),采用横断面二次数据分析设计(13 篇)。各项研究对复原力的定义各不相同。三项研究将复原力作为一种特质,只有一项研究将复原力作为一种行为。大多数研究(20 项)未包含理论框架:大多数研究采用横断面设计,复原力定义也不尽相同,这表明复原力研究仍处于新兴阶段。缺乏可操作的复原力,特别是作为一种行为的复原力,以及理论框架的使用有限,都表明复原痛研究需要进步:本研究对护理实践具有启示意义,有助于护士从整体角度出发,将恢复力纳入护理工作中。这项研究为制定标准复原力定义和框架以指导护理实践提供了初步步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信