Investigating the spatiotemporal patterns and clustering of attendances for mental health services to inform policy and resource allocation in Thailand.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Chawarat Rotejanaprasert, Papin Thanutchapat, Chiraphat Phoncharoenwirot, Ornrakorn Mekchaiporn, Peerut Chienwichai, Richard J Maude
{"title":"Investigating the spatiotemporal patterns and clustering of attendances for mental health services to inform policy and resource allocation in Thailand.","authors":"Chawarat Rotejanaprasert, Papin Thanutchapat, Chiraphat Phoncharoenwirot, Ornrakorn Mekchaiporn, Peerut Chienwichai, Richard J Maude","doi":"10.1186/s13033-024-00639-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental illness poses a substantial global public health challenge, including in Thailand, where exploration of access to mental health services is limited. The spatial and temporal dimensions of mental illness in the country are not extensively studied, despite the recognized association between poor mental health and socioeconomic inequalities. Gaining insights into these dimensions is crucial for effective public health interventions and resource allocation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed mental health service utilization data in Thailand from 2015 to 2023. Temporal trends in annual numbers of individuals visiting mental health services by diagnosis were examined, while spatial pattern analysis employed Moran's I statistics to assess autocorrelation, identify small-area clustering, and hotspots. The implications of our findings for mental health resource allocation and policy were discussed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2015 and 2023, mental health facilities documented a total of 13,793,884 visits. The study found anxiety, schizophrenia, and depression emerged as the top three illnesses for mental health visits, with an increase in patient attendance following the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak. Spatial analysis identified areas of significance for various disorders across different regions of Thailand. Positive correlations between certain disorder pairs were found in specific regions, suggesting shared risk factors or comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights spatial and temporal variations in individuals visiting services for different mental disorders in Thailand, shedding light on service gaps and socioeconomic issues. Addressing these disparities requires increased attention to mental health, the development of appropriate interventions, and overcoming barriers to accessibility. The findings provide a baseline for policymakers and stakeholders to allocate resources and implement culturally responsive interventions to improve mental health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"18 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11080131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-024-00639-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mental illness poses a substantial global public health challenge, including in Thailand, where exploration of access to mental health services is limited. The spatial and temporal dimensions of mental illness in the country are not extensively studied, despite the recognized association between poor mental health and socioeconomic inequalities. Gaining insights into these dimensions is crucial for effective public health interventions and resource allocation.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed mental health service utilization data in Thailand from 2015 to 2023. Temporal trends in annual numbers of individuals visiting mental health services by diagnosis were examined, while spatial pattern analysis employed Moran's I statistics to assess autocorrelation, identify small-area clustering, and hotspots. The implications of our findings for mental health resource allocation and policy were discussed.

Results: Between 2015 and 2023, mental health facilities documented a total of 13,793,884 visits. The study found anxiety, schizophrenia, and depression emerged as the top three illnesses for mental health visits, with an increase in patient attendance following the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak. Spatial analysis identified areas of significance for various disorders across different regions of Thailand. Positive correlations between certain disorder pairs were found in specific regions, suggesting shared risk factors or comorbidities.

Conclusions: This study highlights spatial and temporal variations in individuals visiting services for different mental disorders in Thailand, shedding light on service gaps and socioeconomic issues. Addressing these disparities requires increased attention to mental health, the development of appropriate interventions, and overcoming barriers to accessibility. The findings provide a baseline for policymakers and stakeholders to allocate resources and implement culturally responsive interventions to improve mental health outcomes.

调查泰国心理健康服务的时空模式和就诊人次聚集情况,为政策和资源分配提供信息。
背景:精神疾病是全球公共卫生面临的重大挑战,在泰国也是如此,因为泰国对精神健康服务的探索十分有限。尽管人们认识到心理健康状况不佳与社会经济不平等之间存在关联,但对该国精神疾病的空间和时间维度并没有进行广泛研究。深入了解这些方面对于有效的公共卫生干预和资源分配至关重要:这项回顾性研究分析了 2015 年至 2023 年泰国的精神健康服务利用数据。研究人员根据诊断分析了每年到精神健康服务机构就诊的人数的时间趋势,并利用莫兰 I 统计法进行空间模式分析,以评估自相关性、识别小区域聚类和热点。讨论了我们的研究结果对心理健康资源分配和政策的影响:在 2015 年至 2023 年期间,精神卫生机构共记录了 13,793,884 次就诊。研究发现,焦虑症、精神分裂症和抑郁症是精神健康就诊率最高的三种疾病,在 COVID-19 爆发后患者就诊率有所上升。空间分析确定了泰国不同地区各种疾病的重要区域。在特定地区发现了某些疾病对之间的正相关性,这表明存在共同的风险因素或合并症:本研究强调了泰国不同精神障碍患者就诊的空间和时间差异,揭示了服务差距和社会经济问题。要解决这些差异,就必须加强对精神健康的关注,制定适当的干预措施,并克服就医障碍。研究结果为政策制定者和利益相关者分配资源和实施文化敏感性干预措施以改善心理健康成果提供了基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信