Performance evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification, polymerase chain reaction and real-time polymerase chain reaction methods to detect Neisseria gonorrhoeae among symptomatic patients from India.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
International Journal of STD & AIDS Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1177/09564624241252185
Sunil Sethi, Gurmeet Saini, Priya Sreenivasan, Rajendra Gudisa, Nandita Sharma, Rashmi Bagaa, Rakesh Yadav
{"title":"Performance evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification, polymerase chain reaction and real-time polymerase chain reaction methods to detect <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> among symptomatic patients from India.","authors":"Sunil Sethi, Gurmeet Saini, Priya Sreenivasan, Rajendra Gudisa, Nandita Sharma, Rashmi Bagaa, Rakesh Yadav","doi":"10.1177/09564624241252185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> is one of the most important causative organisms in causing sexually transmitted infections. The clinical presentation of gonorrhoea mimics the symptoms of other sexually transmitted infections, and a proper diagnosis of the same is therefore crucial in patient management. The current study intended to compare different in-house molecular methods: that is, conventional PCR, real-time PCR, and LAMP assay for detection of <i>N</i>. <i>gonorrhoeae</i>. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 163 samples were collected from 145 patients who presented with urethral and vaginal discharge. Collected samples were processed for culture on GC agar base, and three different molecular diagnostic tests (conventional PCR, real-time PCR, and LAMP assay) were performed simultaneously on all the samples. <b>Results:</b> Culture of <i>N</i>. <i>gonorrhoeae</i> was positive in 17 out of 21 (80.9%) swab samples. With culture as the gold standard method, conventional and real-time PCR had a sensitivity of 94.1%, whereas the sensitivity of the LAMP assay was found to be 88.2%. All three methods had a specificity of 100%. In addition to swab samples, evaluation of urine samples by different molecular methods yielded a good concordance with a kappa value of 0.85 by conventional PCR and real-time PCR showing a perfect level of agreement, while the LAMP assay was found to have a substantial level of agreement. <b>Conclusion:</b> LAMP assay had a comparable diagnostic accuracy to other molecular methods for the detection of <i>N</i>. <i>gonorrhoeae</i> and can be used as a point-of-care test in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624241252185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neisseria gonorrhoeae is one of the most important causative organisms in causing sexually transmitted infections. The clinical presentation of gonorrhoea mimics the symptoms of other sexually transmitted infections, and a proper diagnosis of the same is therefore crucial in patient management. The current study intended to compare different in-house molecular methods: that is, conventional PCR, real-time PCR, and LAMP assay for detection of N. gonorrhoeae. Methods: A total of 163 samples were collected from 145 patients who presented with urethral and vaginal discharge. Collected samples were processed for culture on GC agar base, and three different molecular diagnostic tests (conventional PCR, real-time PCR, and LAMP assay) were performed simultaneously on all the samples. Results: Culture of N. gonorrhoeae was positive in 17 out of 21 (80.9%) swab samples. With culture as the gold standard method, conventional and real-time PCR had a sensitivity of 94.1%, whereas the sensitivity of the LAMP assay was found to be 88.2%. All three methods had a specificity of 100%. In addition to swab samples, evaluation of urine samples by different molecular methods yielded a good concordance with a kappa value of 0.85 by conventional PCR and real-time PCR showing a perfect level of agreement, while the LAMP assay was found to have a substantial level of agreement. Conclusion: LAMP assay had a comparable diagnostic accuracy to other molecular methods for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae and can be used as a point-of-care test in resource-limited settings.

环介导等温扩增法、聚合酶链反应法和实时聚合酶链反应法检测印度有症状患者淋病奈瑟菌的性能评估。
背景:淋病奈瑟菌是导致性传播感染的最重要致病菌之一。淋病的临床表现与其他性传播感染的症状相似,因此正确诊断淋病对患者的治疗至关重要。本研究旨在比较不同的内部分子方法:即传统 PCR、实时 PCR 和 LAMP 检测淋球菌的方法。方法:从 145 名尿道和阴道分泌物患者身上共采集了 163 份样本。采集的样本经处理后在 GC 琼脂基质上进行培养,同时对所有样本进行三种不同的分子诊断检测(传统 PCR、实时 PCR 和 LAMP 检测)。结果21 份拭子样本中有 17 份(80.9%)淋球菌培养呈阳性。以培养作为金标准方法,传统 PCR 和实时 PCR 的灵敏度为 94.1%,而 LAMP 检测的灵敏度为 88.2%。三种方法的特异性均为 100%。除了拭子样本外,用不同的分子方法对尿液样本进行评估也取得了很好的一致性,传统 PCR 和实时 PCR 的卡帕值为 0.85,显示出完全一致的水平,而 LAMP 检测法则具有相当高的一致性水平。结论在检测淋球菌方面,LAMP 检测法的诊断准确性与其他分子方法相当,可在资源有限的环境中用作护理点检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信