Evaluation of the transition from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Carmen Amor Costa, Cristina Suárez Ferrer, Laura García Ramírez, Eduardo Martín-Arranz, Joaquín Poza Cordón, José Luis Rueda García, María Sánchez Azofra, Irene González Diaz, Clara Amiama Roig, María Dolores Martín-Arranz
{"title":"Evaluation of the transition from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"Carmen Amor Costa, Cristina Suárez Ferrer, Laura García Ramírez, Eduardo Martín-Arranz, Joaquín Poza Cordón, José Luis Rueda García, María Sánchez Azofra, Irene González Diaz, Clara Amiama Roig, María Dolores Martín-Arranz","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical and biochemical response of inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab, 16 weeks after transitioning from intravenous (iv) to subcutaneous (sc).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational, prospective, single-center cohort study was performed. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and maintenance treatment with vedolizumab, stable for at least 4 months, were offered to switch to sc formulation. At the same time of treatment administration a blood test was performed, with vedolizumab levels and fecal calprotectin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients were included, 12 of them (27.9%) chose to transition to sc formulation. All included patients remained in remission during follow-up. At week 16 no significant differences were found in terms of calprotectin levels in patients on iv treatment (mean 146.6±SD 45.9) vs. sc (159.26±53.9) (p=0.9). Vedolizumab serum levels at week 16 were higher in the sc group (22,364.3±5141.6) vs. iv (11,425.9±1514.2) (p=0.009). At week 16, 9 (75%) of the patients in the sc group were highly satisfied with the medication and 11 (91.7%) considered it easy to administer. Four patients (12.9%) in the iv group and 2 (16.6%) in the sc group presented mild adverse effects. The 2 cases (100%) of the sc group the adverse event was local inflammation at the injection site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our experience, vedolizumab sc is a convenient alternative to iv administration. Vedolizumab serum levels in patients who transitioned to sc were higher than iv formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical and biochemical response of inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab, 16 weeks after transitioning from intravenous (iv) to subcutaneous (sc).

Methods: An observational, prospective, single-center cohort study was performed. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and maintenance treatment with vedolizumab, stable for at least 4 months, were offered to switch to sc formulation. At the same time of treatment administration a blood test was performed, with vedolizumab levels and fecal calprotectin.

Results: Forty-three patients were included, 12 of them (27.9%) chose to transition to sc formulation. All included patients remained in remission during follow-up. At week 16 no significant differences were found in terms of calprotectin levels in patients on iv treatment (mean 146.6±SD 45.9) vs. sc (159.26±53.9) (p=0.9). Vedolizumab serum levels at week 16 were higher in the sc group (22,364.3±5141.6) vs. iv (11,425.9±1514.2) (p=0.009). At week 16, 9 (75%) of the patients in the sc group were highly satisfied with the medication and 11 (91.7%) considered it easy to administer. Four patients (12.9%) in the iv group and 2 (16.6%) in the sc group presented mild adverse effects. The 2 cases (100%) of the sc group the adverse event was local inflammation at the injection site.

Conclusion: In our experience, vedolizumab sc is a convenient alternative to iv administration. Vedolizumab serum levels in patients who transitioned to sc were higher than iv formulation.

评估炎症性肠病患者从静脉注射维多珠单抗到皮下注射维多珠单抗的转变。
目的:本研究旨在评估接受韦多珠单抗治疗的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者从静脉注射(iv)转为皮下注射(sc)16周后的临床和生化反应:进行了一项观察性、前瞻性、单中心队列研究。研究人员为接受维多珠单抗维持治疗且病情稳定至少 4 个月的 IBD 患者提供了改用 sc 制剂的机会。在进行治疗的同时,还进行了血液检测,包括维多珠单抗水平和粪便钙蛋白:结果:共纳入 43 名患者,其中 12 人(27.9%)选择转用 sc 制剂。所有纳入的患者在随访期间均保持病情缓解。在第16周(w16),接受静脉治疗的患者(平均146.6 ± SD 45.9)与接受sc治疗的患者(159.26 ± 53.9)在钙蛋白水平方面没有发现明显差异(P 0.9)。第 16 个月时,sc 组的维多珠单抗血清水平(22364.3 ± 5141.6)高于 iv 组(11425.9 ± 1514.2)(P 0.009)。在第 16 周,SC 组中有 9 名患者(75%)对用药非常满意,11 名患者(91.7%)认为用药简单。静脉注射组中有 4 名患者(12.9%)和 SC 组中有 2 名患者(16.6%)出现轻微不良反应。SC组的2例患者(100%)的不良反应是注射部位局部发炎:根据我们的经验,维多珠单抗sc是静脉注射的一种便捷替代方案。使用 sc 组患者的维多珠单抗血清水平高于 iv 组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology and Hepatology is the first journal to cover the latest advances in pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, and bile ducts, making it an indispensable tool for gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信