Comparing the Use of 80% Trichloroacetic Acid and 50% Trichloroacetic Acid for the Treatment of Ice Pick Acne Scars.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatologic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004228
Luong Nguyen Dac Thuy, Vu Thi Thuy Trang, Nguyen Ngoc Tran, Doan Thi Phuong Thao
{"title":"Comparing the Use of 80% Trichloroacetic Acid and 50% Trichloroacetic Acid for the Treatment of Ice Pick Acne Scars.","authors":"Luong Nguyen Dac Thuy, Vu Thi Thuy Trang, Nguyen Ngoc Tran, Doan Thi Phuong Thao","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) using high concentration trichloroacetic acid (TCA) is a safe, effective, and low-cost treatment for ice pick acne scars.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and effectiveness of the CROSS technique using 50% TCA and 80% TCA for treating ice pick scars.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A nonrandomized, single-blinded, and self-controlled clinical trial was undertaken. Four CROSS sessions were conducted using 50% TCA on the left hemiface and 80% TCA on the right hemiface. The E' chelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acne (ECCA) acne grading scale was used to assess the scars pretreatment and posttreatment. Complications were evaluated after each session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients participated in our study. Significant differences were found between pretreatment and posttreatment ECCA scores ( p < .0001) on both hemifaces. Scores were significantly lower on the side treated with 80% TCA; however, there was no statistical significance in mean ECCA score differences (pretreatment minus posttreatment) between the 2 treatment sides. The adverse events were more serious on the sides treated with 80% TCA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CROSS method using TCA was well-tolerated and effective for treating ice pick acne scars. Less severe complications were associated with 50% TCA, whereas efficacy was the same as 80% TCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) using high concentration trichloroacetic acid (TCA) is a safe, effective, and low-cost treatment for ice pick acne scars.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and effectiveness of the CROSS technique using 50% TCA and 80% TCA for treating ice pick scars.

Materials and methods: A nonrandomized, single-blinded, and self-controlled clinical trial was undertaken. Four CROSS sessions were conducted using 50% TCA on the left hemiface and 80% TCA on the right hemiface. The E' chelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acne (ECCA) acne grading scale was used to assess the scars pretreatment and posttreatment. Complications were evaluated after each session.

Results: Thirty-one patients participated in our study. Significant differences were found between pretreatment and posttreatment ECCA scores ( p < .0001) on both hemifaces. Scores were significantly lower on the side treated with 80% TCA; however, there was no statistical significance in mean ECCA score differences (pretreatment minus posttreatment) between the 2 treatment sides. The adverse events were more serious on the sides treated with 80% TCA.

Conclusion: The CROSS method using TCA was well-tolerated and effective for treating ice pick acne scars. Less severe complications were associated with 50% TCA, whereas efficacy was the same as 80% TCA.

比较使用 80% 三氯乙酸和 50% 三氯乙酸治疗冰锥痤疮疤痕。
背景:使用高浓度三氯乙酸(TCA)进行皮肤疤痕的化学重建(CROSS)是一种安全、有效、低成本的治疗冰锥状痤疮疤痕的方法:比较使用50%三氯乙酸和80%三氯乙酸治疗冰锥状痤疮疤痕的CROSS技术的疗效:进行了一项非随机、单盲和自我控制的临床试验。采用 50%三氯乙酸治疗左半边脸,80%三氯乙酸治疗右半边脸,共进行了四次 CROSS 治疗。采用 E' chelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acne (ECCA) 痤疮分级表对治疗前和治疗后的疤痕进行评估。每次治疗后对并发症进行评估:31名患者参与了研究。在治疗前和治疗后,两侧脸部的 ECCA 评分有显著差异(p < .0001)。使用 80% TCA 治疗的一侧得分明显较低;但是,两个治疗侧的 ECCA 平均得分差异(治疗前减去治疗后)没有统计学意义。采用 80% 三氯乙酸治疗的一侧发生的不良反应更为严重:结论:使用三氯乙酸的CROSS方法对治疗冰锥状痤疮疤痕具有良好的耐受性和有效性。结论:使用三氯乙酸的CROSS法治疗冰锥型痤疮疤痕的耐受性良好,效果显著。50%三氯乙酸的并发症较少,而疗效与80%三氯乙酸相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信