Diagnostic efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 in patients with solid tumors in a head-to-head comparison with [18F]F-FDG: results from a prospective clinical study.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hui Yuan, Entao Liu, Guojin Zhang, Chaoquan Lai, Qing Zhang, Yuxiang Shang, Zhen Cheng, Lei Jiang
{"title":"Diagnostic efficacy of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 in patients with solid tumors in a head-to-head comparison with [<sup>18</sup>F]F-FDG: results from a prospective clinical study.","authors":"Hui Yuan, Entao Liu, Guojin Zhang, Chaoquan Lai, Qing Zhang, Yuxiang Shang, Zhen Cheng, Lei Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s00259-024-06756-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the biodistribution and diagnostic performance of a novel fibroblast activation protein (FAP) targeted positron emission tomography (PET) tracer, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04, in patients with solid tumors in a head-to-head comparison with [<sup>18</sup>F]F-FDG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients histologically proven with cancers of nasopharyngeal (n = 5), esophagus (n = 5), gastro-esophagus (n = 1), stomach (n = 7), liver (n = 3), and colorectum (n = 5) were recruited for [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]F-FDG PET/CT scans on consecutive days. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic efficacy, with the histological diagnosis and the follow-up results selected as the gold standard. The secondary endpoint was the background uptake pattern. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to the gold standard results while having essential awareness of the clinical context reviewed the images and labeled lesions by consensus for subsequent software-assisted lesion segmentation. Additionally, background organs were automatically segmented, assisted by artificial intelligence. Volume, mean, and maximum standard uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax) of all segmentations were recorded. P < 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant glandular uptake of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 was detected in the thyroid, pancreas, and submandibular glands, while moderate uptake was observed in the parotid glands. The myocardium and myometrium exhibited 2-3 times higher uptake of the radiotracer than that of the background levels in blood and liver. A total of 349 targeted lesions, consisting of 324 malignancies and 25 benign lesions, were segmented. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 is more sensitive than [<sup>18</sup>F]F-FDG, especially for abdominopelvic dissemination (1.000 vs. 0.475, P < 0.001). Interestingly, [<sup>18</sup>F]F-FDG demonstrated higher sensitivity for lung metastasis compared to [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 (0.845 vs. 0.682, P = 0.003). The high glandular uptake made it difficult to delineate lesions in close proximity and masked two metastatic lesions in these organs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite prominent glandular uptake, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 demonstrates favorable diagnostic performance. It is a promising probe scaffold for further development of FAP-targeted tumor theranostic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06756-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify the biodistribution and diagnostic performance of a novel fibroblast activation protein (FAP) targeted positron emission tomography (PET) tracer, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04, in patients with solid tumors in a head-to-head comparison with [18F]F-FDG.

Methods: Twenty-six patients histologically proven with cancers of nasopharyngeal (n = 5), esophagus (n = 5), gastro-esophagus (n = 1), stomach (n = 7), liver (n = 3), and colorectum (n = 5) were recruited for [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT scans on consecutive days. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic efficacy, with the histological diagnosis and the follow-up results selected as the gold standard. The secondary endpoint was the background uptake pattern. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to the gold standard results while having essential awareness of the clinical context reviewed the images and labeled lesions by consensus for subsequent software-assisted lesion segmentation. Additionally, background organs were automatically segmented, assisted by artificial intelligence. Volume, mean, and maximum standard uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax) of all segmentations were recorded. P < 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant.

Results: Significant glandular uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 was detected in the thyroid, pancreas, and submandibular glands, while moderate uptake was observed in the parotid glands. The myocardium and myometrium exhibited 2-3 times higher uptake of the radiotracer than that of the background levels in blood and liver. A total of 349 targeted lesions, consisting of 324 malignancies and 25 benign lesions, were segmented. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 is more sensitive than [18F]F-FDG, especially for abdominopelvic dissemination (1.000 vs. 0.475, P < 0.001). Interestingly, [18F]F-FDG demonstrated higher sensitivity for lung metastasis compared to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 (0.845 vs. 0.682, P = 0.003). The high glandular uptake made it difficult to delineate lesions in close proximity and masked two metastatic lesions in these organs.

Conclusion: Despite prominent glandular uptake, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04 demonstrates favorable diagnostic performance. It is a promising probe scaffold for further development of FAP-targeted tumor theranostic agents.

Abstract Image

[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04与[18F]F-FDG在实体瘤患者中的诊断效果对比:一项前瞻性临床研究的结果。
目的:通过与[18F]F-FDG进行头对头比较,确定新型成纤维细胞活化蛋白(FAP)靶向正电子发射断层扫描(PET)示踪剂[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04在实体瘤患者中的生物分布和诊断性能:招募了26名经组织学证实患有鼻咽癌(5人)、食管癌(5人)、胃食管癌(1人)、胃癌(7人)、肝癌(3人)和结直肠癌(5人)的患者,连续几天进行[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04和[18F]F-FDG PET/CT扫描。主要终点是诊断效果,以组织学诊断和随访结果作为金标准。次要终点是背景摄取模式。两名经验丰富的核医学医生对金标准结果处于盲区,但对临床情况有基本的了解,他们对图像进行审查,并在达成共识的基础上标记病灶,以便随后进行软件辅助的病灶分割。此外,在人工智能的辅助下,还对背景器官进行了自动分割。记录所有分割的体积、平均值和最大标准摄取值(SUVmean 和 SUVmax)。P 结果:甲状腺、胰腺和颌下腺对[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04有明显的腺体摄取,而腮腺则有中等摄取。心肌和子宫对放射性示踪剂的摄取量是血液和肝脏本底水平的 2-3 倍。共对 349 个目标病灶进行了分割,其中包括 324 个恶性病灶和 25 个良性病灶。与[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04相比,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04比[18F]F-FDG更敏感,尤其是对腹盆腔播散(1.000 vs. 0.475,P 18F]F-FDG对肺转移的敏感性高于[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04(0.845 vs. 0.682,P = 0.003)。由于腺体摄取较高,因此很难界定相邻的病灶,并掩盖了这些器官中的两个转移病灶:结论:尽管腺体摄取显著,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04仍表现出良好的诊断性能。结论:尽管[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-GPFAPI-04有明显的腺体摄取,但其诊断性能良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信