Preoperative Differentiation of HER2-Zero and HER2-Low from HER2-Positive Invasive Ductal Breast Cancers Using BI-RADS MRI Features and Machine Learning Modeling

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jiejie Zhou MD, Yang Zhang PhD, Haiwei Miao MS, Ga Young Yoon MD, Jinhao Wang MS, Yezhi Lin PhD, Hailing Wang PhD, Yan-Lin Liu PhD, Jeon-Hor Chen MD, Zhifang Pan PhD, Min-Ying Su PhD, Meihao Wang MD
{"title":"Preoperative Differentiation of HER2-Zero and HER2-Low from HER2-Positive Invasive Ductal Breast Cancers Using BI-RADS MRI Features and Machine Learning Modeling","authors":"Jiejie Zhou MD,&nbsp;Yang Zhang PhD,&nbsp;Haiwei Miao MS,&nbsp;Ga Young Yoon MD,&nbsp;Jinhao Wang MS,&nbsp;Yezhi Lin PhD,&nbsp;Hailing Wang PhD,&nbsp;Yan-Lin Liu PhD,&nbsp;Jeon-Hor Chen MD,&nbsp;Zhifang Pan PhD,&nbsp;Min-Ying Su PhD,&nbsp;Meihao Wang MD","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Accurate determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is important for choosing optimal HER2 targeting treatment strategies. HER2-low is currently considered HER2-negative, but patients may be eligible to receive new anti-HER2 drug conjugates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To use breast MRI BI-RADS features for classifying three HER2 levels, first to distinguish HER2-zero from HER2-low/positive (Task-1), and then to distinguish HER2-low from HER2-positive (Task-2).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Type</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>621 invasive ductal cancer, 245 HER2-zero, 191 HER2-low, and 185 HER2-positive. For Task-1, 488 cases for training and 133 for testing. For Task-2, 294 cases for training and 82 for testing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Field Strength/Sequence</h3>\n \n <p>3.0 T; 3D T1-weighted DCE, short time inversion recovery T2, and single-shot EPI DWI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Assessment</h3>\n \n <p>Pathological information and BI-RADS features were compared. Random Forest was used to select MRI features, and then four machine learning (ML) algorithms: decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), <i>k</i>-nearest neighbors (<i>k</i>-NN), and artificial neural nets (ANN), were applied to build models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Statistical Tests</h3>\n \n <p>Chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance, and Kruskal–Wallis test were performed. The <i>P</i> values &lt;0.05 were considered statistically significant. For ML models, the generated probability was used to construct the ROC curves.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Peritumoral edema, the presence of multiple lesions and non-mass enhancement (NME) showed significant differences. For distinguishing HER2-zero from non-zero (low + positive), multiple lesions, edema, margin, and tumor size were selected, and the <i>k</i>-NN model achieved the highest AUC of 0.86 in the training set and 0.79 in the testing set. For differentiating HER2-low from HER2-positive, multiple lesions, edema, and margin were selected, and the DT model achieved the highest AUC of 0.79 in the training set and 0.69 in the testing set.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>BI-RADS features read by radiologists from preoperative MRI can be analyzed using more sophisticated feature selection and ML algorithms to build models for the classification of HER2 status and identify HER2-low.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>4.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Technical Efficacy</h3>\n \n <p>Stage 2.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":"61 2","pages":"928-941"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.29447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Accurate determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is important for choosing optimal HER2 targeting treatment strategies. HER2-low is currently considered HER2-negative, but patients may be eligible to receive new anti-HER2 drug conjugates.

Purpose

To use breast MRI BI-RADS features for classifying three HER2 levels, first to distinguish HER2-zero from HER2-low/positive (Task-1), and then to distinguish HER2-low from HER2-positive (Task-2).

Study Type

Retrospective.

Population

621 invasive ductal cancer, 245 HER2-zero, 191 HER2-low, and 185 HER2-positive. For Task-1, 488 cases for training and 133 for testing. For Task-2, 294 cases for training and 82 for testing.

Field Strength/Sequence

3.0 T; 3D T1-weighted DCE, short time inversion recovery T2, and single-shot EPI DWI.

Assessment

Pathological information and BI-RADS features were compared. Random Forest was used to select MRI features, and then four machine learning (ML) algorithms: decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), and artificial neural nets (ANN), were applied to build models.

Statistical Tests

Chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance, and Kruskal–Wallis test were performed. The P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. For ML models, the generated probability was used to construct the ROC curves.

Results

Peritumoral edema, the presence of multiple lesions and non-mass enhancement (NME) showed significant differences. For distinguishing HER2-zero from non-zero (low + positive), multiple lesions, edema, margin, and tumor size were selected, and the k-NN model achieved the highest AUC of 0.86 in the training set and 0.79 in the testing set. For differentiating HER2-low from HER2-positive, multiple lesions, edema, and margin were selected, and the DT model achieved the highest AUC of 0.79 in the training set and 0.69 in the testing set.

Data Conclusion

BI-RADS features read by radiologists from preoperative MRI can be analyzed using more sophisticated feature selection and ML algorithms to build models for the classification of HER2 status and identify HER2-low.

Level of Evidence

4.

Technical Efficacy

Stage 2.

利用 BI-RADS MRI 特征和机器学习建模对 HER2 零和 HER2 低与 HER2 阳性浸润性导管乳腺癌进行术前鉴别。
背景:准确测定人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)对于选择最佳的HER2靶向治疗策略非常重要。目的:利用乳腺 MRI BI-RADS 特征对三种 HER2 水平进行分类,首先区分 HER2-0 和 HER2 低/阳性(任务-1),然后区分 HER2 低和 HER2 阳性(任务-2):研究类型:回顾性研究:621例浸润性导管癌,其中245例HER2-0,191例HER2-低,185例HER2-阳性。任务-1:488 例用于训练,133 例用于测试。任务-2:294例用于训练,82例用于测试:3.0 T;三维 T1 加权 DCE、短时反转恢复 T2 和单次 EPI DWI:评估:比较病理信息和 BI-RADS 特征。采用随机森林选择 MRI 特征,然后应用四种机器学习(ML)算法:决策树(DT)、支持向量机(SVM)、k-近邻(k-NN)和人工神经网络(ANN)建立模型:进行了卡方检验、单因素方差分析和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验。P 值 结果瘤周水肿、存在多个病灶和非肿块增强(NME)显示出显著差异。在区分HER2-0和非0(低+阳性)时,选择了多发病灶、水肿、边缘和肿瘤大小,k-NN模型在训练集和测试集中的AUC分别为0.86和0.79,达到了最高水平。在区分 HER2 低和 HER2 阳性时,选择了多发病灶、水肿和边缘,DT 模型在训练集中的 AUC 最高,为 0.79,在测试集中为 0.69:放射科医生从术前 MRI 读取的 BI-RADS 特征可通过更复杂的特征选择和 ML 算法进行分析,以建立 HER2 状态分类模型并识别 HER2-低:4:技术疗效:第二阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信