Comparison of three machine learning algorithms for classification of B-cell neoplasms using clinical flow cytometry data

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Wikum Dinalankara, David P. Ng, Luigi Marchionni, Paul D. Simonson
{"title":"Comparison of three machine learning algorithms for classification of B-cell neoplasms using clinical flow cytometry data","authors":"Wikum Dinalankara,&nbsp;David P. Ng,&nbsp;Luigi Marchionni,&nbsp;Paul D. Simonson","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiparameter flow cytometry data is visually inspected by expert personnel as part of standard clinical disease diagnosis practice. This is a demanding and costly process, and recent research has demonstrated that it is possible to utilize artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to assist in the interpretive process. Here we report our examination of three previously published machine learning methods for classification of flow cytometry data and apply these to a B-cell neoplasm dataset to obtain predicted disease subtypes. Each of the examined methods classifies samples according to specific disease categories using ungated flow cytometry data. We compare and contrast the three algorithms with respect to their architectures, and we report the multiclass classification accuracies and relative required computation times. Despite different architectures, two of the methods, flowCat and EnsembleCNN, had similarly good accuracies with relatively fast computational times. We note a speed advantage for EnsembleCNN, particularly in the case of addition of training data and retraining of the classifier.</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.b.22177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiparameter flow cytometry data is visually inspected by expert personnel as part of standard clinical disease diagnosis practice. This is a demanding and costly process, and recent research has demonstrated that it is possible to utilize artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to assist in the interpretive process. Here we report our examination of three previously published machine learning methods for classification of flow cytometry data and apply these to a B-cell neoplasm dataset to obtain predicted disease subtypes. Each of the examined methods classifies samples according to specific disease categories using ungated flow cytometry data. We compare and contrast the three algorithms with respect to their architectures, and we report the multiclass classification accuracies and relative required computation times. Despite different architectures, two of the methods, flowCat and EnsembleCNN, had similarly good accuracies with relatively fast computational times. We note a speed advantage for EnsembleCNN, particularly in the case of addition of training data and retraining of the classifier.

利用临床流式细胞仪数据对三种机器学习算法进行 B 细胞肿瘤分类的比较。
作为标准临床疾病诊断实践的一部分,专家要对多参数流式细胞仪数据进行目视检查。这是一个要求严格且成本高昂的过程,最近的研究表明,利用人工智能(AI)算法协助解释过程是可行的。在此,我们报告了对之前发表的三种流式细胞仪数据分类机器学习方法的研究,并将这些方法应用于B细胞肿瘤数据集,以获得预测的疾病亚型。所研究的每种方法都能利用非门控流式细胞仪数据根据特定疾病类别对样本进行分类。我们对三种算法的架构进行了比较和对比,并报告了多类分类的准确性和所需的相对计算时间。尽管架构不同,但其中的两种方法,即 flowCat 和 EnsembleCNN,都具有类似的高准确度和相对较短的计算时间。我们注意到 EnsembleCNN 的速度优势,特别是在增加训练数据和重新训练分类器的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry features original research reports, in-depth reviews and special issues that directly relate to and palpably impact clinical flow, mass and image-based cytometry. These may include clinical and translational investigations important in the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic management of patients. Thus, we welcome research papers from various disciplines related [but not limited to] hematopathologists, hematologists, immunologists and cell biologists with clinically relevant and innovative studies investigating individual-cell analytics and/or separations. In addition to the types of papers indicated above, we also welcome Letters to the Editor, describing case reports or important medical or technical topics relevant to our readership without the length and depth of a full original report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信