Bimodal diurnal preference in undergraduate students is associated with negative health and sleep outcomes.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Chronobiology International Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1080/07420528.2024.2349684
Julia Ribeiro da Silva Vallim, Heloisa Mayumi Suyama Tsuji, Gabriela Sant'Ana Lima, Beatriz Duarte Palma Xylaras, Fernando Mazzilli Louzada, Sergio Tufik, Vânia D'Almeida
{"title":"Bimodal diurnal preference in undergraduate students is associated with negative health and sleep outcomes.","authors":"Julia Ribeiro da Silva Vallim, Heloisa Mayumi Suyama Tsuji, Gabriela Sant'Ana Lima, Beatriz Duarte Palma Xylaras, Fernando Mazzilli Louzada, Sergio Tufik, Vânia D'Almeida","doi":"10.1080/07420528.2024.2349684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The bimodal preference is a fourth diurnal preference proposed by re-scoring the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire. The present work aimed to describe the prevalence of the bimodal preference in a sample of undergraduate students and to characterize the bimodal type in terms of their health and sleep-related outcomes. A web-based cross-sectional study conducted between September 2018 and March 2021 (convenience sampling method). The sample was composed of undergraduate students who completed an electronic form that included the Morningness and Eveningness Questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Self-Compassion Scale, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the World Health Organization Subjective Well-Being Index. The final sample consisted of 615 students (82% female, mean age: 23.4 ± 6.5 years), of whom 108 (18%) had positive bimodality indexes. Bimodal subjects comprised 48 students, 8% of the total sample. Bimodal subjects had poorer subjective sleep quality, more daytime sleepiness, lower subjective well-being, greater anxiety and depression symptoms, and lower self-compassion than morning and/or intermediate types; they did not differ from evening types. The description of bimodal diurnal preference in this population may be of interest for the design of academic policies more in line with the circadian reality of students.</p>","PeriodicalId":10294,"journal":{"name":"Chronobiology International","volume":" ","pages":"780-788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronobiology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2024.2349684","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bimodal preference is a fourth diurnal preference proposed by re-scoring the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire. The present work aimed to describe the prevalence of the bimodal preference in a sample of undergraduate students and to characterize the bimodal type in terms of their health and sleep-related outcomes. A web-based cross-sectional study conducted between September 2018 and March 2021 (convenience sampling method). The sample was composed of undergraduate students who completed an electronic form that included the Morningness and Eveningness Questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Self-Compassion Scale, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the World Health Organization Subjective Well-Being Index. The final sample consisted of 615 students (82% female, mean age: 23.4 ± 6.5 years), of whom 108 (18%) had positive bimodality indexes. Bimodal subjects comprised 48 students, 8% of the total sample. Bimodal subjects had poorer subjective sleep quality, more daytime sleepiness, lower subjective well-being, greater anxiety and depression symptoms, and lower self-compassion than morning and/or intermediate types; they did not differ from evening types. The description of bimodal diurnal preference in this population may be of interest for the design of academic policies more in line with the circadian reality of students.

大学生的双模昼夜偏好与不良健康和睡眠状况有关。
双峰偏好是通过对 "早睡早起问卷 "进行重新评分而提出的第四种昼夜偏好。本研究旨在描述双峰偏好在本科生样本中的流行程度,并从健康和睡眠相关结果的角度描述双峰类型的特征。2018年9月至2021年3月期间进行了一项基于网络的横断面研究(方便抽样法)。样本由本科生组成,他们填写了一份电子表格,其中包括晨昏问卷、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数、自我同情量表、埃普沃斯嗜睡量表、医院焦虑抑郁量表和世界卫生组织主观幸福指数。最终样本包括 615 名学生(82% 为女性,平均年龄:23.4 ± 6.5 岁),其中 108 人(18%)的双模态指数呈阳性。双模态受试者有 48 名,占样本总数的 8%。与晨间型和/或中间型相比,双峰型受试者的主观睡眠质量较差,白天嗜睡程度较高,主观幸福感较低,焦虑和抑郁症状较重,自我同情程度较低;他们与晚间型没有差异。对这一人群双昼夜偏好的描述可能有助于设计更符合学生昼夜节律现实的学术政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronobiology International
Chronobiology International 生物-生理学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
110
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chronobiology International is the journal of biological and medical rhythm research. It is a transdisciplinary journal focusing on biological rhythm phenomena of all life forms. The journal publishes groundbreaking articles plus authoritative review papers, short communications of work in progress, case studies, and letters to the editor, for example, on genetic and molecular mechanisms of insect, animal and human biological timekeeping, including melatonin and pineal gland rhythms. It also publishes applied topics, for example, shiftwork, chronotypes, and associated personality traits; chronobiology and chronotherapy of sleep, cardiovascular, pulmonary, psychiatric, and other medical conditions. Articles in the journal pertain to basic and applied chronobiology, and to methods, statistics, and instrumentation for biological rhythm study. Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/page/cbi/Description
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信