Contacts with primary and secondary healthcare before suicide by those under the care of mental health services: case-control, whole-population-based study using person-level linked routine data in Wales, UK during 2000-2015.
Marcos DelPozo-Banos, Cathryn Rodway, Sze Chim Lee, Olivier Y Rouquette, Saied Ibrahim, Keith Lloyd, Louis Appleby, Navneet Kapur, Ann John
{"title":"Contacts with primary and secondary healthcare before suicide by those under the care of mental health services: case-control, whole-population-based study using person-level linked routine data in Wales, UK during 2000-2015.","authors":"Marcos DelPozo-Banos, Cathryn Rodway, Sze Chim Lee, Olivier Y Rouquette, Saied Ibrahim, Keith Lloyd, Louis Appleby, Navneet Kapur, Ann John","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People under the care of mental health services are at increased risk of suicide. Existing studies are small in scale and lack comparisons.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify opportunities for suicide prevention and underpinning data enhancement in people with recent contact with mental health services.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This population-based study includes people who died by suicide in the year following a mental health services contact in Wales, 2001-2015 (cases), paired with similar patients who did not die by suicide (controls). We linked the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health and the Suicide Information Database - Cymru with primary and secondary healthcare records. We present results of conditional logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We matched 1031 cases with 5155 controls. In the year before their death, 98.3% of cases were in contact with healthcare services, and 28.5% presented with self-harm. Cases had more emergency department contacts (odds ratio 2.4, 95% CI 2.1-2.7) and emergency hospital admissions (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.7), but fewer primary care contacts (odds ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9) and out-patient appointments (odds ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.2-0.3) than controls. Odds ratios were larger in females than males for injury and poisoning (odds ratio: 3.3 (95% CI 2.5-4.5) <i>v.</i> 2.6 (95% CI 2.1-3.1)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We may be missing existing opportunities to intervene, particularly in emergency departments and hospital admissions with self-harm presentations and with unattributed self-harm, especially in females. Prevention efforts should focus on strengthening routine care contacts, responding to emergency contacts and better self-harm care. There are benefits to enhancing clinical audit systems with routinely collected data.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11094447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.23","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: People under the care of mental health services are at increased risk of suicide. Existing studies are small in scale and lack comparisons.
Aims: To identify opportunities for suicide prevention and underpinning data enhancement in people with recent contact with mental health services.
Method: This population-based study includes people who died by suicide in the year following a mental health services contact in Wales, 2001-2015 (cases), paired with similar patients who did not die by suicide (controls). We linked the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health and the Suicide Information Database - Cymru with primary and secondary healthcare records. We present results of conditional logistic regression.
Results: We matched 1031 cases with 5155 controls. In the year before their death, 98.3% of cases were in contact with healthcare services, and 28.5% presented with self-harm. Cases had more emergency department contacts (odds ratio 2.4, 95% CI 2.1-2.7) and emergency hospital admissions (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.7), but fewer primary care contacts (odds ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9) and out-patient appointments (odds ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.2-0.3) than controls. Odds ratios were larger in females than males for injury and poisoning (odds ratio: 3.3 (95% CI 2.5-4.5) v. 2.6 (95% CI 2.1-3.1)).
Conclusions: We may be missing existing opportunities to intervene, particularly in emergency departments and hospital admissions with self-harm presentations and with unattributed self-harm, especially in females. Prevention efforts should focus on strengthening routine care contacts, responding to emergency contacts and better self-harm care. There are benefits to enhancing clinical audit systems with routinely collected data.
背景:接受精神健康服务的人群自杀风险增加。现有的研究规模较小,缺乏可比性。目的:在最近接触过精神健康服务的人群中确定预防自杀的机会,并加强基础数据:这项基于人口的研究包括 2001-2015 年间威尔士接触过精神健康服务后一年内自杀身亡的人(病例),以及未自杀身亡的类似患者(对照)。我们将 "全国自杀与精神健康安全保密调查"(National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health)和 "自杀信息数据库--威尔士"(Suicide Information Database - Cymru)与初级和二级医疗记录联系起来。我们展示了条件逻辑回归的结果:我们将 1031 例病例与 5155 例对照进行了配对。在死亡前一年,98.3%的病例接触过医疗服务,28.5%的病例出现过自残行为。与对照组相比,病例接触急诊科(几率比 2.4,95% CI 2.1-2.7)和急诊入院(几率比 1.5,95% CI 1.4-1.7)的次数较多,但接触初级保健(几率比 0.7,95% CI 0.6-0.9)和门诊预约(几率比 0.2,95% CI 0.2-0.3)的次数较少。在受伤和中毒方面,女性的几率比大于男性(几率比:3.3 (95% CI 2.5-4.5) v. 2.6 (95% CI 2.1-3.1)):我们可能错失了现有的干预机会,特别是在急诊室和入院时出现的自残症状和未归因的自残行为,尤其是女性。预防工作的重点应放在加强日常护理接触、应对紧急接触和更好的自残护理上。利用日常收集的数据加强临床审计系统也有好处。
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.