Plyometric Jump Training Effects on Maximal Strength in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of Randomized-Controlled Studies.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Javier Sanchez-Sanchez, Alejandro Rodriguez-Fernandez, Urs Granacher, José Afonso, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
{"title":"Plyometric Jump Training Effects on Maximal Strength in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of Randomized-Controlled Studies.","authors":"Javier Sanchez-Sanchez, Alejandro Rodriguez-Fernandez, Urs Granacher, José Afonso, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo","doi":"10.1186/s40798-024-00720-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maximal strength may contribute to soccer players' performance. Several resistance training modalities offer the potential to improve maximal strength. During recent years, a large number of plyometric jump training (PJT) studies showed evidence for maximal strength improvements in soccer players. However, a comprehensive summary of the available data is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effects of PJT compared with active, passive or intervention controls on the maximal strength of soccer players, irrespective of age, sex or competitive level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS) were systematically searched. Studies published from inception until March 2023 were included. A PICOS approach was used to rate studies for eligibility. The PEDro scale was used to assess risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model if ≥ 3 studies were available. Moderator and sensitivity analyses were performed, and meta-regression was conducted when ≥ 10 studies were available for a given comparison. We rated the certainty of evidence using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 13,029 documents, and from these 30 studies were eligible for the systematic review, and 27 for the meta-analyses. Overall, 1,274 soccer players aged 10.7-25.0 years participated in the included studies. Only one study recruited females. The PJT interventions lasted between 5 and 40 weeks (median = 8 weeks), with 1-3 weekly sessions. Compared to controls, PJT improved maximal dynamic strength (18 studies, 632 participants [7 females], aged 12.7-24.5 y; effect size [ES] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-0.78, p = 0.017, impact of statistical heterogeneity [I<sup>2</sup>] = 77.9%), isometric strength (7 studies; 245 participants, males, aged 11.1-22.5 y; ES = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.28-0.87, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 17.7%), and isokinetic peak torque (5 studies; 183 participants, males, aged 12.6-25.0 y; ES = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.22-0.80, p = 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%). The PJT-induced maximal dynamic strength changes were independent of participants' age (median = 18.0 y), weeks of intervention (median = 8 weeks), and total number of training sessions (median = 16 sessions). The certainty of evidence was considered low to very low for the main analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions involving PJT are more effective to improve maximal strength in soccer players compared to control conditions involving traditional sport-specific training. Trial Registration The trial registration protocol was published on the Open Science Framework (OSF) platform in December 2022, with the following links to the project ( https://osf.io/rpxjk ) and to the registration ( https://osf.io/3ruyj ).</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11087442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00720-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maximal strength may contribute to soccer players' performance. Several resistance training modalities offer the potential to improve maximal strength. During recent years, a large number of plyometric jump training (PJT) studies showed evidence for maximal strength improvements in soccer players. However, a comprehensive summary of the available data is lacking.

Objective: To examine the effects of PJT compared with active, passive or intervention controls on the maximal strength of soccer players, irrespective of age, sex or competitive level.

Methods: To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS) were systematically searched. Studies published from inception until March 2023 were included. A PICOS approach was used to rate studies for eligibility. The PEDro scale was used to assess risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model if ≥ 3 studies were available. Moderator and sensitivity analyses were performed, and meta-regression was conducted when ≥ 10 studies were available for a given comparison. We rated the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

Results: The search identified 13,029 documents, and from these 30 studies were eligible for the systematic review, and 27 for the meta-analyses. Overall, 1,274 soccer players aged 10.7-25.0 years participated in the included studies. Only one study recruited females. The PJT interventions lasted between 5 and 40 weeks (median = 8 weeks), with 1-3 weekly sessions. Compared to controls, PJT improved maximal dynamic strength (18 studies, 632 participants [7 females], aged 12.7-24.5 y; effect size [ES] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-0.78, p = 0.017, impact of statistical heterogeneity [I2] = 77.9%), isometric strength (7 studies; 245 participants, males, aged 11.1-22.5 y; ES = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.28-0.87, p < 0.001, I2 = 17.7%), and isokinetic peak torque (5 studies; 183 participants, males, aged 12.6-25.0 y; ES = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.22-0.80, p = 0.001, I2 = 0.0%). The PJT-induced maximal dynamic strength changes were independent of participants' age (median = 18.0 y), weeks of intervention (median = 8 weeks), and total number of training sessions (median = 16 sessions). The certainty of evidence was considered low to very low for the main analyses.

Conclusions: Interventions involving PJT are more effective to improve maximal strength in soccer players compared to control conditions involving traditional sport-specific training. Trial Registration The trial registration protocol was published on the Open Science Framework (OSF) platform in December 2022, with the following links to the project ( https://osf.io/rpxjk ) and to the registration ( https://osf.io/3ruyj ).

负重跳跃训练对足球运动员最大力量的影响:随机对照研究的系统回顾与元分析》。
背景最大力量可能有助于提高足球运动员的表现。几种阻力训练模式都有可能提高最大力量。近年来,大量负重跳跃训练(PJT)研究显示,有证据表明足球运动员的最大力量有所提高。然而,目前还缺乏对现有数据的全面总结:不分年龄、性别或竞技水平,研究负重跳跃训练与主动、被动或干预控制相比对足球运动员最大力量的影响:按照 PRISMA 2020 进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。系统检索了三个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science 和 SCOPUS)。纳入了从开始到 2023 年 3 月发表的研究。采用 PICOS 方法对研究进行资格评定。采用 PEDro 量表评估偏倚风险。如果有≥3项研究可用,则使用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型进行元分析。如果特定比较的研究≥10 项,则进行调节分析和敏感性分析,并进行元回归。我们使用 GRADE 对证据的确定性进行了评级:搜索共发现 13,029 篇文献,其中 30 项研究符合系统综述的要求,27 项符合荟萃分析的要求。共有 1,274 名年龄在 10.7-25.0 岁之间的足球运动员参与了所纳入的研究。只有一项研究招募了女性。PJT干预持续了5至40周(中位数=8周),每周1至3次。与对照组相比,PJT 提高了最大动态力量(18 项研究,632 名参与者[7 名女性],年龄 12.7-24.5 岁;效应大小 [ES] = 0.43,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 0.08-0.78,P = 0.017,统计异质性影响 [I2] = 77.9%)、等长力量(7 项研究;245 名参与者,男性,年龄 11.1-22.5 岁;ES = 0.58,95% CI = 0.28-0.87,p 2 = 17.7%)和等动峰值扭矩(5 项研究;183 名参与者,男性,年龄 12.6-25.0 岁;ES = 0.51,95% CI = 0.22-0.80,p = 0.001,I2 = 0.0%)。PJT 诱导的最大动态力量变化与参与者的年龄(中位数 = 18.0 岁)、干预周数(中位数 = 8 周)和训练总次数(中位数 = 16 次)无关。主要分析的证据确定性为低至极低:结论:与涉及传统特定运动训练的对照条件相比,涉及 PJT 的干预措施能更有效地提高足球运动员的最大力量。试验注册 试验注册协议于2022年12月发布在开放科学框架(OSF)平台上,项目链接(https://osf.io/rpxjk )和注册链接(https://osf.io/3ruyj )如下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信