Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer: Improving treatment delivery efficiency and accuracy

Q1 Nursing
Edoardo Mastella , Joel E. Epile , Eleonora De Guglielmo , Sara Fabbri , Francesca Calderoni , Luigi Manco , Klarisa E. Szilagyi , Antonio Malorgio , Alessandro Turra , Antonio Stefanelli
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer: Improving treatment delivery efficiency and accuracy","authors":"Edoardo Mastella ,&nbsp;Joel E. Epile ,&nbsp;Eleonora De Guglielmo ,&nbsp;Sara Fabbri ,&nbsp;Francesca Calderoni ,&nbsp;Luigi Manco ,&nbsp;Klarisa E. Szilagyi ,&nbsp;Antonio Malorgio ,&nbsp;Alessandro Turra ,&nbsp;Antonio Stefanelli","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>In stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, intrafraction motion is an important source of treatment uncertainty as it could not be completely smoothed through fractionation. Herein, we compared different arrangements and beam qualities for extreme hypofractionated treatments to minimize beam delivery time and so intrafractional errors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective dataset of 11 patients was used. Three volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beam arrangements were compared for a prescription dose of 40 Gy/5 fractions: two full arcs, 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF); one full arc, 6 MV FFF; one full arc, 10 MV FFF. A plan quality index was defined to compare achievement of the planning goals. Plan complexity was evaluated with the modulation factor. Dose delivery accuracy and efficiency were measured with patient-specific quality assurance plans.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All treatment plans fulfilled all dose objectives. No statistical differences were found both in plan quality and complexity. Very accurate dose delivery was achieved with the three arrangements, with mean γ passing rates &gt;96.5 % (2 %/2 mm criteria). Slightly but significantly higher γ passing rates were observed with single-arc 6 MV FFF. Contrariwise, statistically significant reductions of the delivery time were obtained with single-arc geometries: the average delivery times were 1.6 min (−46.1 %) and 1.3 min (−56.2 %) for 6 and 10 MV FFF respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The high-quality, very fast and accurate dose delivery of single-arc plans confirmed the suitability of this arrangement for prostate SBRT. In particular, the significant reduction of delivery time would improve treatment robustness against intrafraction prostate motion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000209/pdfft?md5=4b5dc977cdf82421510d54390f6cf850&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000209-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, intrafraction motion is an important source of treatment uncertainty as it could not be completely smoothed through fractionation. Herein, we compared different arrangements and beam qualities for extreme hypofractionated treatments to minimize beam delivery time and so intrafractional errors.

Methods

A retrospective dataset of 11 patients was used. Three volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beam arrangements were compared for a prescription dose of 40 Gy/5 fractions: two full arcs, 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF); one full arc, 6 MV FFF; one full arc, 10 MV FFF. A plan quality index was defined to compare achievement of the planning goals. Plan complexity was evaluated with the modulation factor. Dose delivery accuracy and efficiency were measured with patient-specific quality assurance plans.

Results

All treatment plans fulfilled all dose objectives. No statistical differences were found both in plan quality and complexity. Very accurate dose delivery was achieved with the three arrangements, with mean γ passing rates >96.5 % (2 %/2 mm criteria). Slightly but significantly higher γ passing rates were observed with single-arc 6 MV FFF. Contrariwise, statistically significant reductions of the delivery time were obtained with single-arc geometries: the average delivery times were 1.6 min (−46.1 %) and 1.3 min (−56.2 %) for 6 and 10 MV FFF respectively.

Conclusions

The high-quality, very fast and accurate dose delivery of single-arc plans confirmed the suitability of this arrangement for prostate SBRT. In particular, the significant reduction of delivery time would improve treatment robustness against intrafraction prostate motion.

前列腺癌的立体定向体放射治疗 (SBRT):提高治疗效率和准确性
目的 在前列腺癌的立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)中,由于无法通过分次治疗完全平滑,因此分次内运动是治疗不确定性的重要来源。在此,我们比较了极端低分次治疗的不同安排和射束质量,以尽量缩短射束输送时间,从而减少分次内误差。比较了处方剂量为 40 Gy/5 次分割的三种体积调制弧治疗(VMAT)射束安排:两个全弧,6 MV 无扁平化滤波器(FFF);一个全弧,6 MV FFF;一个全弧,10 MV FFF。为比较计划目标的实现情况,定义了计划质量指数。计划复杂度通过调制因子进行评估。所有治疗计划都达到了所有剂量目标。在计划质量和复杂性方面均未发现统计学差异。三种方案都能实现非常精确的剂量投放,平均γ合格率为96.5%(2%/2毫米标准)。单弧 6 MV FFF 的 γ 通过率稍高,但明显更高。与此相反,单弧几何图形的给药时间在统计学上显著缩短:6 MV FFF 和 10 MV FFF 的平均给药时间分别为 1.6 分钟(-46.1%)和 1.3 分钟(-56.2%)。特别是,大幅缩短的给药时间将提高治疗的稳健性,防止前列腺在分射中发生移动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信