{"title":"An interdisciplinary review of systemic risk factors leading up to existential risks","authors":"Trond Arne Undheim","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Systemic risks derive from a mix of economic, technological, socio political, and ecological factors. Inherently interdisciplinary, the study of systemic risk draws on financial shock models, operations research, global health, foresight, management, military strategy, risk assessment, risk sociology, disaster research, security studies, science and technology studies, existential risk (X-risk) research as well as the AI risk and biorisk communities. The study of systemic risk requires developing transdisciplinary tools that can better integrate the insights drawn from these disparate fields despite high uncertainty. Nevertheless, there remains no overarching framework specifically formulated for systemic risks beyond economics. This paper reviews this body of work aiming to begin formulating an approach for the integrated study of systemic risk leading up to existential risks or X-risks, the possibility of human extinction. Given that risks that threaten entire societies might cascade across systems, the various systemic risk fields should begin to align risk factors and vocabulary to better combine insights and increase humanity's resilience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000164/pdfft?md5=bff8346cd851e158c7b7e65cd82ce1f0&pid=1-s2.0-S2590061724000164-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Systemic risks derive from a mix of economic, technological, socio political, and ecological factors. Inherently interdisciplinary, the study of systemic risk draws on financial shock models, operations research, global health, foresight, management, military strategy, risk assessment, risk sociology, disaster research, security studies, science and technology studies, existential risk (X-risk) research as well as the AI risk and biorisk communities. The study of systemic risk requires developing transdisciplinary tools that can better integrate the insights drawn from these disparate fields despite high uncertainty. Nevertheless, there remains no overarching framework specifically formulated for systemic risks beyond economics. This paper reviews this body of work aiming to begin formulating an approach for the integrated study of systemic risk leading up to existential risks or X-risks, the possibility of human extinction. Given that risks that threaten entire societies might cascade across systems, the various systemic risk fields should begin to align risk factors and vocabulary to better combine insights and increase humanity's resilience.
系统性风险由经济、技术、社会政治和生态因素共同造成。系统性风险的研究本身就是跨学科的,它借鉴了金融冲击模型、运筹学、全球健康、展望、管理学、军事战略、风险评估、风险社会学、灾害研究、安全研究、科技研究、生存风险(X 风险)研究以及人工智能风险和生物风险社区的研究成果。系统性风险研究需要开发跨学科工具,以便在高度不确定的情况下更好地整合从这些不同领域汲取的见解。然而,除经济学之外,仍没有专门针对系统性风险制定的总体框架。本文回顾了这方面的工作,旨在着手制定一种方法,用于综合研究系统性风险,直至存在性风险或 X 风险,即人类灭绝的可能性。鉴于威胁到整个社会的风险可能会在各系统间串联,各种系统性风险领域应开始调整风险因素和词汇,以更好地结合见解,提高人类的复原力。
期刊介绍:
Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery.
A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.