Influence of sitting time on pulmonary function in computerusing office workers.

Physical activity and nutrition Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-31 DOI:10.20463/pan.2024.0003
Aditi Upmanyu, Amit Kumar, Varun Kalia
{"title":"Influence of sitting time on pulmonary function in computerusing office workers.","authors":"Aditi Upmanyu, Amit Kumar, Varun Kalia","doi":"10.20463/pan.2024.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to identify the changes in pulmonary function after prolonged sitting. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) allow physicians to assess the respiratory capability of patients under numerous clinical circumstances and when there are risk factors for lung sickness, occupational exposure, and pulmonary toxicity. PFTs are routinely performed in the standing or high sitting position because of the devices and patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 180 asymptomatic office workers were recruited as eligibility criteria and divided into three groups according to their daily sitting duration (group 1:2-4 h, group 2:4-6 h, and group 3: > 6 h). PFTs were performed twice consecutively to determine the mean of the readings. A Helios 401 spirometer was used to quantify lung function. The parameters were \"forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)\", \"forced vital capacity (FVC)\", \"peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)\", and the \"ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC)\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results suggest that noteworthy changes were present in the lung function of all the participants. For individuals with > 6 h of sitting; FVC, FEV1, and PEFR were higher compared to those of the participants with 2-4 h and 4-6 h of sitting. The FEV1/FVC ratio was also reduced in individuals with prolonged hours of sitting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Body position impacts the result of PFTs; however, that as it may, the ideal position and extent of advantage changed between the review populaces. These results suggested that noteworthy changes occur in the lung function of healthy individuals exposed to sitting time.</p>","PeriodicalId":74444,"journal":{"name":"Physical activity and nutrition","volume":"28 1","pages":"20-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11079380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical activity and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20463/pan.2024.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to identify the changes in pulmonary function after prolonged sitting. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) allow physicians to assess the respiratory capability of patients under numerous clinical circumstances and when there are risk factors for lung sickness, occupational exposure, and pulmonary toxicity. PFTs are routinely performed in the standing or high sitting position because of the devices and patient comfort.

Methods: A total of 180 asymptomatic office workers were recruited as eligibility criteria and divided into three groups according to their daily sitting duration (group 1:2-4 h, group 2:4-6 h, and group 3: > 6 h). PFTs were performed twice consecutively to determine the mean of the readings. A Helios 401 spirometer was used to quantify lung function. The parameters were "forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)", "forced vital capacity (FVC)", "peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)", and the "ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC)".

Results: Our results suggest that noteworthy changes were present in the lung function of all the participants. For individuals with > 6 h of sitting; FVC, FEV1, and PEFR were higher compared to those of the participants with 2-4 h and 4-6 h of sitting. The FEV1/FVC ratio was also reduced in individuals with prolonged hours of sitting.

Conclusion: Body position impacts the result of PFTs; however, that as it may, the ideal position and extent of advantage changed between the review populaces. These results suggested that noteworthy changes occur in the lung function of healthy individuals exposed to sitting time.

久坐对电脑办公人员肺功能的影响
目的:我们旨在确定久坐后肺功能的变化。肺功能检查(PFTs)使医生能够在多种临床情况下以及存在肺部疾病、职业暴露和肺毒性等危险因素时评估患者的呼吸能力。由于设备和患者舒适度的原因,PFT 通常在站立或高坐位进行:方法:以 180 名无症状的办公室工作人员为合格标准,根据他们每天的坐姿时间分为三组(第一组:2-4 小时;第二组:4-6 小时;第三组:> 6 小时)。连续进行两次肺活量检查,以确定读数的平均值。使用 Helios 401 肺活量计对肺功能进行量化。参数包括 "1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)"、"用力肺活量(FVC)"、"呼气峰流速(PEFR)"和 "FEV1 与 FVC 之比(FEV1/FVC)":结果表明,所有参与者的肺功能都发生了显著变化。与久坐 2-4 小时和 4-6 小时的参与者相比,久坐时间超过 6 小时的参与者的肺活量、肺活量1 和肺活量增加。久坐者的 FEV1/FVC 比值也有所下降:结论:体位对肺活量测量结果有影响;然而,尽管如此,不同人群的理想体位和优势程度却有所不同。这些结果表明,久坐的健康人肺功能会发生显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信