Frequency and Aberrant CD Marker Profile of Acute Leukaemias.

Muhammad Zain Arshad, Muhammad Aftab Hassan, Maryam Bibi, Muhammad Hussain, Mustajab Alam, Muhammad Omair Riaz
{"title":"Frequency and Aberrant CD Marker Profile of Acute Leukaemias.","authors":"Muhammad Zain Arshad, Muhammad Aftab Hassan, Maryam Bibi, Muhammad Hussain, Mustajab Alam, Muhammad Omair Riaz","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.05.539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the frequency of different types of acute leukaemia and their subtypes along with associated aberrant CD markers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Immunology Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from November 2021 to October 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>All samples received for flow cytometric immunophenotyping with suspicion of acute leukaemia were included in the study. Cells were stained with fluorochrome labelled monoclonal antibodies against lineage-specific cluster of differentiation (CD) markers through a lyse-wash procedure. Acquisition and analysis were done using multi-parameter BD FACS Canto II Flow cytometer and BD FACS Diva software, respectively. Data were entered and analysed using SPSS v 23.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a period of 2 years, a total of 1,115 suspected patients were tested for acute leukaemia. Among them, 728 (65.3%) were males and 387 (34.7%) were females, with mean age 28 ± 21 years, ranging from 1 week to 87 years. Among a total of 875/1115 (78.5%) diagnosed cases of acute leukaemia, AML was the most common leukaemia present in 408/875 (46.6%) patients followed by B-ALL and T-ALL in 384/875 (43.8%) and 70/87 (8%) patients, respectively (p = 0.5712). Aberrant CD markers were detected in 109/875 (12.5%) leukaemias (p = 0.0628). The most common aberrant CD markers in B-ALL were CD13 and CD33 present in 30/384 (7.8%) cases separately. Among AML and T-ALL most common aberrant CD markers were CD7 and CD33 present in 25/408 (6.13%) and 7/70 (10%) cases, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Special consideration should be given to the presence of aberrant CD markers when assigning lineages to acute leukaemias. They may be important diagnostic, prognostic, and management tools for institution of immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Aberrant CD markers, Acute leukaemia, CD Markers, Flow cytometry, Immunophenotyping.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.05.539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the frequency of different types of acute leukaemia and their subtypes along with associated aberrant CD markers.

Study design: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Immunology Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from November 2021 to October 2023.

Methodology: All samples received for flow cytometric immunophenotyping with suspicion of acute leukaemia were included in the study. Cells were stained with fluorochrome labelled monoclonal antibodies against lineage-specific cluster of differentiation (CD) markers through a lyse-wash procedure. Acquisition and analysis were done using multi-parameter BD FACS Canto II Flow cytometer and BD FACS Diva software, respectively. Data were entered and analysed using SPSS v 23.0.

Results: Over a period of 2 years, a total of 1,115 suspected patients were tested for acute leukaemia. Among them, 728 (65.3%) were males and 387 (34.7%) were females, with mean age 28 ± 21 years, ranging from 1 week to 87 years. Among a total of 875/1115 (78.5%) diagnosed cases of acute leukaemia, AML was the most common leukaemia present in 408/875 (46.6%) patients followed by B-ALL and T-ALL in 384/875 (43.8%) and 70/87 (8%) patients, respectively (p = 0.5712). Aberrant CD markers were detected in 109/875 (12.5%) leukaemias (p = 0.0628). The most common aberrant CD markers in B-ALL were CD13 and CD33 present in 30/384 (7.8%) cases separately. Among AML and T-ALL most common aberrant CD markers were CD7 and CD33 present in 25/408 (6.13%) and 7/70 (10%) cases, respectively.

Conclusion: Special consideration should be given to the presence of aberrant CD markers when assigning lineages to acute leukaemias. They may be important diagnostic, prognostic, and management tools for institution of immunotherapy.

Key words: Aberrant CD markers, Acute leukaemia, CD Markers, Flow cytometry, Immunophenotyping.

急性白血病的发病率和 CD 标记异常特征
研究目的研究设计:描述性研究。研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第国立医科大学武装部队病理研究所免疫学系,2021 年 11 月至 2023 年 10 月:研究对象包括所有疑似急性白血病的流式细胞免疫分型样本。通过裂解-洗涤程序,用荧光标记的单克隆抗体对细胞系特异性分化群(CD)标记物进行染色。分别使用多参数 BD FACS Canto II 流式细胞仪和 BD FACS Diva 软件进行采集和分析。使用 SPSS v 23.0 输入和分析数据:在两年时间里,共有 1 115 名疑似急性白血病患者接受了检测。其中,男性 728 人(65.3%),女性 387 人(34.7%),平均年龄为 28±21 岁,从 1 周到 87 岁不等。在875/1115(78.5%)例确诊的急性白血病病例中,408/875(46.6%)例患者最常见的白血病是急性髓细胞白血病,其次是B-ALL和T-ALL,分别为384/875(43.8%)例和70/87(8%)例(P = 0.5712)。109/875(12.5%)例白血病中检测到CD标记异常(p = 0.0628)。B-ALL中最常见的CD标志物异常是CD13和CD33,分别出现在30/384(7.8%)例中。在AML和T-ALL中,最常见的CD标志物异常是CD7和CD33,分别出现在25/408(6.13%)和7/70(10%)例中:结论:在为急性白血病划分血系时,应特别考虑异常CD标记物的存在。结论:在对急性白血病进行系谱划分时,应特别考虑异常 CD 标记的存在,它们可能是进行免疫治疗的重要诊断、预后和管理工具:异常CD标记物 急性白血病 CD标记物 流式细胞术 免疫分型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信