Masking for COVID-19 and other respiratory viral infections: implications of the available evidence.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE Pub Date : 2024-05-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ash.2024.67
Daniel T Halperin, Shira Doron, Stephen Hodgins, Robert C Bailey, Stefan Baral, Rajiv Bhatia, Jeanne Noble, Monica Gandhi, Norman Hearst
{"title":"Masking for COVID-19 and other respiratory viral infections: implications of the available evidence.","authors":"Daniel T Halperin, Shira Doron, Stephen Hodgins, Robert C Bailey, Stefan Baral, Rajiv Bhatia, Jeanne Noble, Monica Gandhi, Norman Hearst","doi":"10.1017/ash.2024.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of face masks has been widely promoted and at times mandated to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The 2023 publication of an updated Cochrane review on mask effectiveness for respiratory viruses as well as the unfolding epidemiology of COVID-19 underscore the need for an unbiased assessment of the current scientific evidence. It appears that the widespread promotion, adoption, and mandating of masking for COVID-19 were based not primarily on the strength of evidence for effectiveness but more on the imperative of decision-makers to act in the face of a novel public health emergency, with seemingly few good alternatives. Randomized clinical trials of masking for prevention of COVID-19 and other respiratory viruses have so far shown no evidence of benefit (with the possible exception of continuous use of N95 respirators by hospital workers). Observational studies provide lower-quality evidence and do not convincingly demonstrate benefit from masking or mask mandates. Unless robust new evidence emerges showing the effectiveness of masks in reducing infection or transmission risks in either trials or real-world conditions, mandates are not warranted for future epidemics of respiratory viral infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11077603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of face masks has been widely promoted and at times mandated to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The 2023 publication of an updated Cochrane review on mask effectiveness for respiratory viruses as well as the unfolding epidemiology of COVID-19 underscore the need for an unbiased assessment of the current scientific evidence. It appears that the widespread promotion, adoption, and mandating of masking for COVID-19 were based not primarily on the strength of evidence for effectiveness but more on the imperative of decision-makers to act in the face of a novel public health emergency, with seemingly few good alternatives. Randomized clinical trials of masking for prevention of COVID-19 and other respiratory viruses have so far shown no evidence of benefit (with the possible exception of continuous use of N95 respirators by hospital workers). Observational studies provide lower-quality evidence and do not convincingly demonstrate benefit from masking or mask mandates. Unless robust new evidence emerges showing the effectiveness of masks in reducing infection or transmission risks in either trials or real-world conditions, mandates are not warranted for future epidemics of respiratory viral infections.

COVID-19 和其他呼吸道病毒感染的掩蔽:现有证据的意义。
为预防 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19),口罩的使用得到了广泛推广,有时还被强制要求使用。2023 年发表的关于口罩对呼吸道病毒有效性的最新科克伦综述以及 COVID-19 流行病学的不断发展,都强调了对当前科学证据进行公正评估的必要性。目前看来,广泛推广、采用和强制要求对 COVID-19 进行掩蔽的主要依据并不是有效性的证据,而更多的是决策者在面对新的公共卫生紧急状况时采取行动的迫切需要,因为似乎没有什么好的替代方案。迄今为止,为预防 COVID-19 和其他呼吸道病毒而进行的掩蔽随机临床试验没有显示出任何有益的证据(医院工作人员持续使用 N95 呼吸器可能是个例外)。观察性研究提供的证据质量较低,不能令人信服地证明佩戴口罩或强制佩戴口罩的益处。除非有新的有力证据表明口罩在试验或实际情况中能有效降低感染或传播风险,否则在未来的呼吸道病毒感染流行中没有必要强制使用口罩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信