The Efficacy of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Plus an Adjuvant against Helicoverpa zea and Chrysodeixis includens in Aboveground Applications.

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Journal of nematology Pub Date : 2024-05-08 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2024-0018
Minling Zhang, Nathan Spaulding, Gadi V P Reddy, David I Shapiro-Ilan
{"title":"The Efficacy of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Plus an Adjuvant against <i>Helicoverpa zea</i> and <i>Chrysodeixis includens</i> in Aboveground Applications.","authors":"Minling Zhang, Nathan Spaulding, Gadi V P Reddy, David I Shapiro-Ilan","doi":"10.2478/jofnem-2024-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the southern United States, corn earworm, <i>Helicoverpa zea</i> (Boddie), and soybean looper, <i>Chrysodeixis includens</i> (Walker) are economically important crop pests. Although Bt crops initially provided effective control of target pests such as <i>H. zea</i>, many insect pests have developed resistance to these Bt crops. Alternative approaches are needed, including biological control agents such as entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs). However, the effectiveness of EPNs for aboveground applications can be limited due to issues such as desiccation and ultraviolet radiation. Effective adjuvants are needed to overcome these problems. Ten strains of EPNs were tested for virulence against eggs, first to fourth instars, fifth instars, and pupae of <i>H. zea</i> and <i>C. includens</i> in the laboratory. These 10 EPN strains were <i>Heterorhabditis bacteriophora</i> (HP88 and VS strains), <i>H. floridensis</i> (K22 strain), Hgkesha (Kesha strain), <i>Steinernema carpocapsae</i> (All and Cxrd strains), <i>S. feltiae</i> (SN strain), <i>S. rarum</i> (17c+e strain), and <i>S. riobrave</i> (355 and 7-12 strains). EPNs could infect eggs of <i>H. zea</i> or <i>C. includens</i> in the laboratory, but the infection was low. The mortality caused by 10 EPN strains in seven days was significantly higher for the first to fourth instars of <i>H. zea</i> compared to the control, as was the fifth instars of <i>H. zea</i>. Similarly, for the first to fourth and fifth instars of <i>C. includens</i>, the mortality was significantly higher compared to the controls, respectively. However, only <i>S. riobrave</i> (355) had significantly higher mortality than the control for the pupae of <i>H. zea</i>. For the pupae of <i>C. includens</i>, except for <i>H. bacteriophora (HP88)</i>, <i>S. rarum (17c+e)</i>, and <i>H. floridensis</i> (K22), the mortality of the other seven strains was significantly higher than the control. Subsequently, <i>S. carpocapsae</i> (All) and <i>S. riobrave</i> (7-12) were chosen for efficacy testing in the field with an adjuvant 0.066% Southern Ag Surfactant (SAg Surfactant). In field experiments, the SAg Surfactant treatment significantly increased the mortality and EPN infection for <i>S. carpocapsae</i> (All) on first instars of <i>H. zea</i> in corn plant whorls. On soybean plants, with the SAg Surfactant, <i>S. carpocapsae</i> (All) was more effective than <i>S. riobrave</i> (7-12) on fifth instars of <i>C. includens</i>. This study indicates that EPNs can control <i>H. zea</i> and <i>C. includens</i>, and SAg Surfactant can enhance EPN efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nematology","volume":"56 1","pages":"20240018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nematology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2024-0018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the southern United States, corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), and soybean looper, Chrysodeixis includens (Walker) are economically important crop pests. Although Bt crops initially provided effective control of target pests such as H. zea, many insect pests have developed resistance to these Bt crops. Alternative approaches are needed, including biological control agents such as entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs). However, the effectiveness of EPNs for aboveground applications can be limited due to issues such as desiccation and ultraviolet radiation. Effective adjuvants are needed to overcome these problems. Ten strains of EPNs were tested for virulence against eggs, first to fourth instars, fifth instars, and pupae of H. zea and C. includens in the laboratory. These 10 EPN strains were Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (HP88 and VS strains), H. floridensis (K22 strain), Hgkesha (Kesha strain), Steinernema carpocapsae (All and Cxrd strains), S. feltiae (SN strain), S. rarum (17c+e strain), and S. riobrave (355 and 7-12 strains). EPNs could infect eggs of H. zea or C. includens in the laboratory, but the infection was low. The mortality caused by 10 EPN strains in seven days was significantly higher for the first to fourth instars of H. zea compared to the control, as was the fifth instars of H. zea. Similarly, for the first to fourth and fifth instars of C. includens, the mortality was significantly higher compared to the controls, respectively. However, only S. riobrave (355) had significantly higher mortality than the control for the pupae of H. zea. For the pupae of C. includens, except for H. bacteriophora (HP88), S. rarum (17c+e), and H. floridensis (K22), the mortality of the other seven strains was significantly higher than the control. Subsequently, S. carpocapsae (All) and S. riobrave (7-12) were chosen for efficacy testing in the field with an adjuvant 0.066% Southern Ag Surfactant (SAg Surfactant). In field experiments, the SAg Surfactant treatment significantly increased the mortality and EPN infection for S. carpocapsae (All) on first instars of H. zea in corn plant whorls. On soybean plants, with the SAg Surfactant, S. carpocapsae (All) was more effective than S. riobrave (7-12) on fifth instars of C. includens. This study indicates that EPNs can control H. zea and C. includens, and SAg Surfactant can enhance EPN efficacy.

昆虫病原线虫加佐剂在地面应用中对 Helicoverpa zea 和 Chrysodeixis includens 的功效。
在美国南部,玉米穗虫(Helicoverpa zea (Boddie))和大豆环虱(Chrysodeixis includens (Walker))是经济上重要的作物害虫。虽然 Bt 作物最初能有效控制 H. zea 等目标害虫,但许多害虫已经对这些 Bt 作物产生了抗药性。因此需要替代方法,包括昆虫病原线虫(EPNs)等生物控制剂。然而,由于干燥和紫外线辐射等问题,EPNs 在地面上的应用效果可能有限。需要有效的佐剂来克服这些问题。在实验室中测试了 10 株 EPN 对玉米螟卵、一至四龄幼虫、五龄幼虫和蛹的毒力。这 10 株 EPN 分别是:Heterorhabditis bacteriophora(HP88 株和 VS 株)、H. floridensis(K22 株)、Hgkesha(Kesha 株)、Steinernema carpocapsae(All 株和 Cxrd 株)、S. feltiae(SN 株)、S. rarum(17c+e 株)和 S. riobrave(355 株和 7-12 株)。在实验室中,EPN 可感染 H. zea 或 C. includens 的卵,但感染率较低。与对照组相比,10 株 EPN 在 7 天内对玉米螟第一至第四龄幼虫造成的死亡率明显较高,对玉米螟第五龄幼虫也是如此。同样,C. includeens 的第一至第四龄和第五龄死亡率也分别明显高于对照组。然而,只有 S. riobrave(355)对 H. zea 蛹的死亡率明显高于对照组。对于 C. includeens 的蛹,除 H. bacteriophora(HP88)、S. rarum(17c+e)和 H. floridensis(K22)外,其他 7 个菌株的死亡率均明显高于对照。随后,S. carpocapsae(All)和 S. riobrave(7-12)被选中与 0.066% Southern Ag Surfactant(SAg Surfactant)佐剂一起进行田间药效测试。在田间试验中,SAg 表面活性剂处理显著提高了玉米植株轮纹叶蝉(H. zea)初龄幼虫对 S. carpocapsae(All)的死亡率和 EPN 感染率。在大豆植株上,施用 SAg 表面活性剂后,鲤形目蝇蛆(全株)对 C. includens 第五龄幼虫的作用比 S. riobrave(7-12 株)更强。这项研究表明,EPN 可以控制 H. zea 和 C. includens,而 SAg 表面活性剂可以提高 EPN 的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of nematology
Journal of nematology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nematology is the official technical and scientific communication publication of the Society of Nematologists since 1969. The journal publishes original papers on all aspects of basic, applied, descriptive, theoretical or experimental nematology and adheres to strict peer-review policy. Other categories of papers include invited reviews, research notes, abstracts of papers presented at annual meetings, and special publications as appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信