The landscape of inequalities in dementia across Europe: First insights from the INTERDEM taskforce

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clarissa Giebel, Emma Harding, Anna Volkmer, Ilaria Chirico, Louise Hopper, Dorota Szczesniak, Catherine V. Talbot, Ana Diaz-Ponce, Dianne Gove, Martin Knapp, Louise Robinson, Malayka Rahman-Amin, Rene Thyrian, Kerry Hanna, INTERDEM Taskforce on Inequalities in Dementia Care
{"title":"The landscape of inequalities in dementia across Europe: First insights from the INTERDEM taskforce","authors":"Clarissa Giebel,&nbsp;Emma Harding,&nbsp;Anna Volkmer,&nbsp;Ilaria Chirico,&nbsp;Louise Hopper,&nbsp;Dorota Szczesniak,&nbsp;Catherine V. Talbot,&nbsp;Ana Diaz-Ponce,&nbsp;Dianne Gove,&nbsp;Martin Knapp,&nbsp;Louise Robinson,&nbsp;Malayka Rahman-Amin,&nbsp;Rene Thyrian,&nbsp;Kerry Hanna,&nbsp;INTERDEM Taskforce on Inequalities in Dementia Care","doi":"10.1002/gps.6096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Getting a diagnosis of dementia does not equate to equitable access to care. People with dementia and unpaid carers face many barriers to care, which can vary within, and across, different countries and cultures. With little evidence across different countries, the aim of this scoping exercise was to identify the different and similar types of inequalities in dementia across Europe, and provide recommendations for addressing these.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a brief online survey with INTERDEM and INTERDEM Academy members across Europe, and with members of Alzheimer Europe's European Working Group of People with Dementia and Carers in February and March 2023. Members were asked about whether inequalities in dementia care existed within their country; if yes, to highlight three key inequalities. Responses on barriers were coded into groups, and frequencies of inequalities were calculated. Highlighted inequalities were discussed and prioritised at face-to-face and virtual consensus meetings in England, Ireland, Italy, and Poland, involving people with dementia, unpaid carers, health and social care providers, and non-profit organisations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-nine academics, PhD students, people with dementia and unpaid carers from 10 countries (Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Malta, Netherlands, UK) completed the survey. The most frequently identified inequalities focused on unawareness and lack of information, higher level system issues (i.e. lack of communication among care professionals), lack of service suitability, and stigma. Other barriers included workforce training and knowledge, financial costs, culture and language, lack of single-point-of-contact person, age, and living location/postcode lottery. There was general consensus among people living dementia and care providers of unawareness as a key barrier in different European countries, with varied priorities in Ireland depending on geographical location.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings provide a first insight on dementia inequalities across Europe, generate cross-country learnings on how to address these inequalities in dementia, and can underpin further solution-focused research that informs policy and key decision makers to implement changes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.6096","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.6096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Getting a diagnosis of dementia does not equate to equitable access to care. People with dementia and unpaid carers face many barriers to care, which can vary within, and across, different countries and cultures. With little evidence across different countries, the aim of this scoping exercise was to identify the different and similar types of inequalities in dementia across Europe, and provide recommendations for addressing these.

Methods

We conducted a brief online survey with INTERDEM and INTERDEM Academy members across Europe, and with members of Alzheimer Europe's European Working Group of People with Dementia and Carers in February and March 2023. Members were asked about whether inequalities in dementia care existed within their country; if yes, to highlight three key inequalities. Responses on barriers were coded into groups, and frequencies of inequalities were calculated. Highlighted inequalities were discussed and prioritised at face-to-face and virtual consensus meetings in England, Ireland, Italy, and Poland, involving people with dementia, unpaid carers, health and social care providers, and non-profit organisations.

Results

Forty-nine academics, PhD students, people with dementia and unpaid carers from 10 countries (Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Malta, Netherlands, UK) completed the survey. The most frequently identified inequalities focused on unawareness and lack of information, higher level system issues (i.e. lack of communication among care professionals), lack of service suitability, and stigma. Other barriers included workforce training and knowledge, financial costs, culture and language, lack of single-point-of-contact person, age, and living location/postcode lottery. There was general consensus among people living dementia and care providers of unawareness as a key barrier in different European countries, with varied priorities in Ireland depending on geographical location.

Conclusions

These findings provide a first insight on dementia inequalities across Europe, generate cross-country learnings on how to address these inequalities in dementia, and can underpin further solution-focused research that informs policy and key decision makers to implement changes.

欧洲痴呆症的不平等状况:INTERDEM 工作组的初步见解。
背景:被诊断出患有痴呆症并不等于可以公平地获得护理。痴呆症患者和无偿照护者在获得照护方面面临着许多障碍,这些障碍在不同的国家和文化中会有所不同。由于不同国家之间的证据很少,此次范围界定工作旨在确定欧洲各国在痴呆症方面存在的不同和相似类型的不平等现象,并为解决这些问题提供建议:我们在 2023 年 2 月和 3 月对欧洲的 INTERDEM 和 INTERDEM 学院成员,以及欧洲阿尔茨海默氏症欧洲痴呆症患者和照护者工作组的成员进行了简短的在线调查。成员们被问及他们的国家在痴呆症护理方面是否存在不平等现象;如果存在,请强调三个主要的不平等现象。有关障碍的回答被编为若干组,不平等的频率也被计算出来。在英格兰、爱尔兰、意大利和波兰举行的面对面和虚拟共识会议上,痴呆症患者、无偿照护者、医疗和社会护理服务提供者以及非营利组织参与了讨论,并对突出的不平等现象进行了优先排序:来自 10 个国家(比利时、丹麦、德国、希腊、爱尔兰、意大利、波兰、马耳他、荷兰、英国)的 49 名学者、博士生、痴呆症患者和无偿照护者完成了调查。最常发现的不平等现象集中在不了解和缺乏信息、更高层次的系统问题(即护理专业人员之间缺乏沟通)、缺乏服务适用性以及耻辱感等方面。其他障碍包括劳动力培训和知识、经济成本、文化和语言、缺乏单点联系人、年龄以及居住地点/邮政编码抽签。欧洲各国的痴呆症患者和护理服务提供者普遍认为,不了解痴呆症是主要障碍,而爱尔兰则因地理位置不同而有不同的重点:这些研究结果首次揭示了欧洲痴呆症的不平等现象,就如何解决这些痴呆症的不平等问题提供了跨国经验,并为进一步开展以解决方案为重点的研究奠定了基础,从而为政策制定者和主要决策者提供了实施变革的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信