A brief mindfulness-based intervention for stress, pain, emotion and attention regulation in military service members with mild traumatic brain injury

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
William K. MacNulty, Jay M. Uomoto, Seattle M. Peterson
{"title":"A brief mindfulness-based intervention for stress, pain, emotion and attention regulation in military service members with mild traumatic brain injury","authors":"William K. MacNulty,&nbsp;Jay M. Uomoto,&nbsp;Seattle M. Peterson","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The primary aim of this study was to conduct an open pilot clinical trial of a brief mindfulness-based intervention for persistent postconcussion symptoms that occur after mild traumatic brain injury in military service members. For many service members, operational tempo and other time constraints may prevent them from completing a standard mindfulness-based stress reduction course. Thus, this study sought to examine the effectiveness of a five-session intervention called mindfulness-based stress, pain, emotion, and attention regulation (MSPEAR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were active duty service members with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and persisting postconcussion symptoms, all of whom were recruited from an outpatient TBI rehabilitation program at a military treatment facility. Of the 38 service members that were initially enrolled, 25 completed the 5-session MSPEAR intervention, and 20 returned for a 5-week follow-up evaluation. Questionnaires assessing perceived stress, positive affect, pain interference and catastrophizing, sleep disturbances, perceived behavioral and attention regulation, self-efficacy and satisfaction with life were administered at preintervention, postintervention, and at 5-week follow-up intervals. Neuropsychological testing at preintervention and 5-week follow-up included performance validity measures, attention, working memory, and executive function measures. <i>T</i>-tests were run to compare for questionnaire measures at preintervention (Time 1) to postintervention (Time 2). Repeated analysis of variances were conducted to compare questionnaire and neuropsychological measures at Time 1, Time 2, and at Time 3 which is the 5-week follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Improvements in perceived stress, positive affect, behavioral regulation, metacognition, sleep disturbance, self-efficacy, and satisfaction with life were found immediately after the MSPEAR intervention and were maintained at the 5-week follow-up. Magnification and helplessness aspects of pain catastrophizing improved when comparing preintervention to the 5-week follow-up. Pain interference was not significantly different across study assessment times. Neuropsychological testing revealed improvements in sustained attention, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control when comparing preintervention to the 5-week follow-up assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The MSPEAR intervention appears to show promise as a brief and effective therapy for specific postconcussion symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury in military service members. Each of the components of MSPEAR including stress, pain catastrophizing, emotion and attention regulation showed improvements in this study, and bears further investigation in a larger scale, preferably randomized controlled trial in those active duty military service members who experience persisting symptoms after a mild traumatic brain injury.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The primary aim of this study was to conduct an open pilot clinical trial of a brief mindfulness-based intervention for persistent postconcussion symptoms that occur after mild traumatic brain injury in military service members. For many service members, operational tempo and other time constraints may prevent them from completing a standard mindfulness-based stress reduction course. Thus, this study sought to examine the effectiveness of a five-session intervention called mindfulness-based stress, pain, emotion, and attention regulation (MSPEAR).

Methods

Participants were active duty service members with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and persisting postconcussion symptoms, all of whom were recruited from an outpatient TBI rehabilitation program at a military treatment facility. Of the 38 service members that were initially enrolled, 25 completed the 5-session MSPEAR intervention, and 20 returned for a 5-week follow-up evaluation. Questionnaires assessing perceived stress, positive affect, pain interference and catastrophizing, sleep disturbances, perceived behavioral and attention regulation, self-efficacy and satisfaction with life were administered at preintervention, postintervention, and at 5-week follow-up intervals. Neuropsychological testing at preintervention and 5-week follow-up included performance validity measures, attention, working memory, and executive function measures. T-tests were run to compare for questionnaire measures at preintervention (Time 1) to postintervention (Time 2). Repeated analysis of variances were conducted to compare questionnaire and neuropsychological measures at Time 1, Time 2, and at Time 3 which is the 5-week follow-up.

Results

Improvements in perceived stress, positive affect, behavioral regulation, metacognition, sleep disturbance, self-efficacy, and satisfaction with life were found immediately after the MSPEAR intervention and were maintained at the 5-week follow-up. Magnification and helplessness aspects of pain catastrophizing improved when comparing preintervention to the 5-week follow-up. Pain interference was not significantly different across study assessment times. Neuropsychological testing revealed improvements in sustained attention, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control when comparing preintervention to the 5-week follow-up assessment.

Conclusions

The MSPEAR intervention appears to show promise as a brief and effective therapy for specific postconcussion symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury in military service members. Each of the components of MSPEAR including stress, pain catastrophizing, emotion and attention regulation showed improvements in this study, and bears further investigation in a larger scale, preferably randomized controlled trial in those active duty military service members who experience persisting symptoms after a mild traumatic brain injury.

对轻度脑外伤军人的压力、疼痛、情绪和注意力调节进行简短的正念干预。
目的:本研究的主要目的是针对军人轻度脑外伤后出现的持续性脑震荡后症状,开展一项基于正念的简短干预的开放性试点临床试验。对于许多军人来说,作战节奏和其他时间限制可能会使他们无法完成标准的正念减压课程。因此,本研究试图考察一种名为正念压力、疼痛、情绪和注意力调节(MSPEAR)的五节课干预的有效性:参与者均为有轻度脑外伤(TBI)病史和持续脑震荡后症状的现役军人,他们都是从一家军事治疗机构的门诊 TBI 康复项目中招募的。在最初注册的 38 名军人中,25 人完成了为期 5 个疗程的 MSPEAR 干预,20 人返回接受了为期 5 周的后续评估。在干预前、干预后和 5 周的随访期间,对感知压力、积极情绪、疼痛干扰和灾难化、睡眠障碍、感知行为和注意力调节、自我效能感和生活满意度进行了问卷调查。在干预前和 5 周随访期间进行的神经心理学测试包括表现有效性测量、注意力、工作记忆和执行功能测量。对干预前(时间 1)和干预后(时间 2)的问卷测量进行了 T 检验比较。在时间 1、时间 2 和时间 3(即 5 周的随访)对问卷和神经心理测量进行了重复方差分析:结果:在接受 MSPEAR 干预后,感知压力、积极情绪、行为调节、元认知、睡眠障碍、自我效能感和生活满意度都立即得到了改善,并在 5 周的随访中保持不变。干预前与 5 周随访相比,疼痛灾难化的放大和无助方面有所改善。不同研究评估时间的疼痛干扰没有明显差异。神经心理学测试显示,干预前与5周随访评估相比,持续注意力、工作记忆、认知灵活性和抑制控制能力均有所改善:MSPEAR 干预疗法作为一种简短有效的疗法,似乎有望治疗军人轻度脑外伤后的特定脑震荡症状。在这项研究中,MSPEAR 的每个组成部分(包括压力、疼痛灾难化、情绪和注意力调节)都有所改善,值得对那些在轻度脑外伤后症状持续存在的现役军人进行更大规模的、最好是随机对照试验的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信