Toward Improved Radiologic Diagnostics: Investigating the Utility and Limitations of GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 with Quiz Cases.

Tomohiro Kikuchi, Takahiro Nakao, Yuta Nakamura, Shouhei Hanaoka, Harushi Mori, Takeharu Yoshikawa
{"title":"Toward Improved Radiologic Diagnostics: Investigating the Utility and Limitations of GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 with Quiz Cases.","authors":"Tomohiro Kikuchi, Takahiro Nakao, Yuta Nakamura, Shouhei Hanaoka, Harushi Mori, Takeharu Yoshikawa","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The rise of large language models such as generative pretrained transformers (GPTs) has sparked considerable interest in radiology, especially in interpreting radiologic reports and image findings. While existing research has focused on GPTs estimating diagnoses from radiologic descriptions, exploring alternative diagnostic information sources is also crucial. This study introduces the use of GPTs (GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4) for information retrieval and summarization, searching relevant case reports via PubMed, and investigates their potential to aid diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From October 2021 to December 2023, we selected 115 cases from the \"Case of the Week\" series on the <i>American Journal of Neuroradiology</i> website. Their Description and Legend sections were presented to the GPTs for the 2 tasks. For the Direct Diagnosis task, the models provided 3 differential diagnoses that were considered correct if they matched the diagnosis in the diagnosis section. For the Case Report Search task, the models generated 2 keywords per case, creating PubMed search queries to extract up to 3 relevant reports. A response was considered correct if reports containing the disease name stated in the diagnosis section were extracted. The McNemar test was used to evaluate whether adding a Case Report Search to Direct Diagnosis improved overall accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Direct Diagnosis task, GPT-3.5 Turbo achieved a correct response rate of 26% (30/115 cases), whereas GPT-4 achieved 41% (47/115). For the Case Report Search task, GPT-3.5 Turbo scored 10% (11/115), and GPT-4 scored 7% (8/115). Correct responses totaled 32% (37/115) with 3 overlapping cases for GPT-3.5 Turbo, whereas GPT-4 had 43% (50/115) of correct responses with 5 overlapping cases. Adding Case Report Search improved GPT-3.5 Turbo's performance (<i>P </i>= .023) but not that of GPT-4 (<i>P </i>= .248).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effectiveness of adding Case Report Search to GPT-3.5 Turbo was particularly pronounced, suggesting its potential as an alternative diagnostic approach to GPTs, particularly in scenarios where direct diagnoses from GPTs are not obtainable. Nevertheless, the overall performance of GPT models in both direct diagnosis and case report retrieval tasks remains not optimal, and users should be aware of their limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The rise of large language models such as generative pretrained transformers (GPTs) has sparked considerable interest in radiology, especially in interpreting radiologic reports and image findings. While existing research has focused on GPTs estimating diagnoses from radiologic descriptions, exploring alternative diagnostic information sources is also crucial. This study introduces the use of GPTs (GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4) for information retrieval and summarization, searching relevant case reports via PubMed, and investigates their potential to aid diagnosis.

Materials and methods: From October 2021 to December 2023, we selected 115 cases from the "Case of the Week" series on the American Journal of Neuroradiology website. Their Description and Legend sections were presented to the GPTs for the 2 tasks. For the Direct Diagnosis task, the models provided 3 differential diagnoses that were considered correct if they matched the diagnosis in the diagnosis section. For the Case Report Search task, the models generated 2 keywords per case, creating PubMed search queries to extract up to 3 relevant reports. A response was considered correct if reports containing the disease name stated in the diagnosis section were extracted. The McNemar test was used to evaluate whether adding a Case Report Search to Direct Diagnosis improved overall accuracy.

Results: In the Direct Diagnosis task, GPT-3.5 Turbo achieved a correct response rate of 26% (30/115 cases), whereas GPT-4 achieved 41% (47/115). For the Case Report Search task, GPT-3.5 Turbo scored 10% (11/115), and GPT-4 scored 7% (8/115). Correct responses totaled 32% (37/115) with 3 overlapping cases for GPT-3.5 Turbo, whereas GPT-4 had 43% (50/115) of correct responses with 5 overlapping cases. Adding Case Report Search improved GPT-3.5 Turbo's performance (P = .023) but not that of GPT-4 (P = .248).

Conclusions: The effectiveness of adding Case Report Search to GPT-3.5 Turbo was particularly pronounced, suggesting its potential as an alternative diagnostic approach to GPTs, particularly in scenarios where direct diagnoses from GPTs are not obtainable. Nevertheless, the overall performance of GPT models in both direct diagnosis and case report retrieval tasks remains not optimal, and users should be aware of their limitations.

改进放射诊断:用问答案例调查 GPT-3.5 Turbo 和 GPT-4 的实用性和局限性。
背景和目的:生成式预训练转换器(GPT)等大型语言模型的兴起引发了人们对放射学的极大兴趣,尤其是在解释放射报告和图像结果方面。虽然现有的研究主要集中在 GPT 从放射学描述中估计诊断结果,但探索其他诊断信息来源也至关重要。本研究介绍使用 GPT(GPT-3.5 Turbo 和 GPT-4)进行信息检索和总结,通过 PubMed 搜索相关病例报告,并研究其辅助诊断的潜力:从 2021 年 10 月到 2023 年 12 月,我们从《美国神经放射学杂志》网站的 "每周病例 "系列中选取了 115 个病例。这些病例的描述和图例部分已提交给两个任务的 GPT。在 "直接诊断 "任务中,模型提供了三个鉴别诊断,如果与诊断部分的诊断相符,则被认为是正确的。在病例报告搜索任务中,模型为每个病例生成两个关键词,创建 PubMed 搜索查询以提取多达三份相关报告。如果提取到的报告包含诊断部分所述的疾病名称,则认为回答正确。采用 McNemar 检验来评估在 "直接诊断 "中添加 "病例报告搜索 "是否会提高总体准确率:在直接诊断任务中,GPT-3.5 Turbo 的正确回答率为 26%(30/115 例),而 GPT-4 的正确回答率为 41%(47/115 例)。在病例报告搜索任务中,GPT-3.5 Turbo 的正确率为 10% (11/115),而 GPT-4 的正确率为 7% (8/115)。GPT-3.5 Turbo 的正确回答率为 32%(37/115),有三个重叠案例,而 GPT-4 的正确回答率为 43%(50/115),有五个重叠案例。添加案例报告搜索提高了 GPT-3.5 Turbo 的性能(p = 0.023),但没有提高 GPT-4 的性能(p = 0.248):结论:在 GPT-3.5 Turbo 中添加病例报告搜索的效果特别明显,这表明它有潜力成为 GPT 的替代诊断方法,尤其是在无法从 GPT 中获得直接诊断的情况下。尽管如此,GPT 模型在直接诊断和病例报告检索任务中的总体表现仍未达到最佳,用户应了解其局限性:AI = 人工智能,GPT = 生成式预训练转换器,LLM = 大型语言模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信