Balloon venoplasty for right heart catheterization from the arm in patients with subclavian vein stenosis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kishor Khanal, Juan A Pastor-Cervantes, Sunay Shah, Jianli Niu, Jonathan Roberts
{"title":"Balloon venoplasty for right heart catheterization from the arm in patients with subclavian vein stenosis.","authors":"Kishor Khanal, Juan A Pastor-Cervantes, Sunay Shah, Jianli Niu, Jonathan Roberts","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the trans-radial era, arm venous access for right heart catheterization (RHC) is rising. Procedural success is affected by many factors, including subclavian/innominate vein stenosis (SVS) and pre-existing wires or catheters. In a study published previously by the same authors, 2% of cases had unsuccessful RHC through the arm, predominantly due to SVS. Since that study, techniques to improve RHC success rates have been developed, including crossing the stenosis with a coronary guidewire, followed by balloon dilatation. We aimed to determine whether subclavian/innominate venoplasty allows successful RHC in patients with SVS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective study included patients who had RHC from the arm between November 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022 that was unsuccessful due to the inability to pass a catheter through the SVS, and then underwent balloon venoplasty. The success rate of completed RHC was then assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2506 RHCs via arm access, 2488 were successful with a catheter alone or over a guidewire. In 18 patients, venoplasty was needed for catheter passage over a guidewire. Post-dilatation, all 18 cases (100%) had successful RHC with a mean procedural time of 35.2 (SD = 15.5) minutes. The most common stenosis site was the subclavian vein in 13 patients (72.2%), and 12 patients (66.7%) had pacemaker/ implantable cardioverter defibrillator wires present.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balloon dilatation of SVS is an efficacious method to improve the success rate of RHC from the arm. It is a safe technique that may prevent cross-over to a different access site, thereby improving patient satisfaction and reducing the possibility of alternate site complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In the trans-radial era, arm venous access for right heart catheterization (RHC) is rising. Procedural success is affected by many factors, including subclavian/innominate vein stenosis (SVS) and pre-existing wires or catheters. In a study published previously by the same authors, 2% of cases had unsuccessful RHC through the arm, predominantly due to SVS. Since that study, techniques to improve RHC success rates have been developed, including crossing the stenosis with a coronary guidewire, followed by balloon dilatation. We aimed to determine whether subclavian/innominate venoplasty allows successful RHC in patients with SVS.

Methods: Our retrospective study included patients who had RHC from the arm between November 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022 that was unsuccessful due to the inability to pass a catheter through the SVS, and then underwent balloon venoplasty. The success rate of completed RHC was then assessed.

Results: Out of 2506 RHCs via arm access, 2488 were successful with a catheter alone or over a guidewire. In 18 patients, venoplasty was needed for catheter passage over a guidewire. Post-dilatation, all 18 cases (100%) had successful RHC with a mean procedural time of 35.2 (SD = 15.5) minutes. The most common stenosis site was the subclavian vein in 13 patients (72.2%), and 12 patients (66.7%) had pacemaker/ implantable cardioverter defibrillator wires present.

Conclusions: Balloon dilatation of SVS is an efficacious method to improve the success rate of RHC from the arm. It is a safe technique that may prevent cross-over to a different access site, thereby improving patient satisfaction and reducing the possibility of alternate site complications.

锁骨下静脉狭窄患者从手臂进行右心导管检查的球囊静脉成形术。
目的:在经桡动脉时代,右心导管检查(RHC)的手臂静脉入路正在增加。手术成功与否受多种因素影响,包括锁骨下静脉/腹股沟静脉狭窄(SVS)和预先存在的导线或导管。在同一作者之前发表的一项研究中,2% 的病例经手臂 RHC 不成功,主要原因是 SVS。自该研究以来,提高 RHC 成功率的技术不断发展,包括用冠状动脉导丝穿过狭窄处,然后进行球囊扩张。我们的目的是确定锁骨下/腹股沟静脉成形术是否能让 SVS 患者成功进行 RHC:我们的回顾性研究纳入了在 2019 年 11 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间从手臂进行 RHC 的患者,这些患者因导管无法通过 SVS 而未能成功,随后接受了球囊静脉成形术。然后评估完成 RHC 的成功率:结果:在通过手臂入路进行的 2506 例 RHC 中,有 2488 例仅使用导管或通过导丝成功完成。在 18 名患者中,导管通过导丝时需要进行静脉成形术。扩张后,所有 18 例患者(100%)都成功进行了 RHC,平均手术时间为 35.2 分钟(标度 = 15.5)。13例患者(72.2%)最常见的狭窄部位是锁骨下静脉,12例患者(66.7%)存在心脏起搏器/植入式心脏除颤器导线:结论:球囊扩张 SVS 是提高手臂 RHC 成功率的有效方法。它是一种安全的技术,可防止患者跨入不同的入路部位,从而提高患者满意度并减少发生其他部位并发症的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信