Evaluating the effect of replacing wheat flour with legume flour on ileal amino acid digestibility in healthy adults with an ileostomy

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
D. Belobrajdic, H. Brook, G. James-Martin, R. Weerakkody, R. Stockman
{"title":"Evaluating the effect of replacing wheat flour with legume flour on ileal amino acid digestibility in healthy adults with an ileostomy","authors":"D. Belobrajdic, H. Brook, G. James-Martin, R. Weerakkody, R. Stockman","doi":"10.1017/s0029665124000673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Protein-rich animal foods are highly digestible, high-quality sources or protein, whereas the protein quality of plant-based foods can vary considerably. Given the growing interest in alternative non-animal-based sources of protein, it is important to establish the protein digestibility of these new foods and protein concentrates which have important health implications especially for vulnerable groups who don’t consume sufficient dietary protein. The human ileostomy model is ideal for measuring protein digestibility as it enables protein digestion to be quantified independent of protein degradation in the large intestine. The aim of this study was to determine the protein digestibility and quality of a wheat-based food containing legume flours. This randomised, double-blinded, controlled cross-over intervention was conducted in 4 proctocolectomised adults with conventional and well-functioning permanent ileostomies. The study was conducted over 2 weeks and on each testing day, the participant consumed 2 test muffins (125 g each) or 2 protein-free cookies in the morning (breakfast and morning tea) followed by a standardised low-protein lunch and afternoon tea. Test muffins were made using a standard muffin recipe using wheat flour and for 2 of the test muffins 50% of the flour was substituted with soy or lupin flour. An indigestible marker, titanium dioxide was added to the muffins so that the completeness of muffin recovered in ileal digesta could be calculated. The digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) was determined by comparing concentrations of true ileal digestible indispensable amino acids to recommended amino acid requirements<span>(1)</span>. Data was reported as mean ± SD and repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare means between treatment groups with significance reported at P &lt; 0.05. Substituting 50% of wheat flour in muffins with soy or lupin flour doubled the protein content of muffins (soy 11.8 g/100g and lupin 10.6 g/100g) compared to muffins that only contained wheat flour (wheat 5.1 g/100g). However, substituting wheat with legume flour did not affect protein digestibility which was similar for all muffin types; wheat (76.8 ± 7.0%), soy (77.9 ± 7.4%) and lupin (81.6 ± 6.9%) (P = 0.181). The DIAAS values for all muffins were below 75% which is classified as the cut off for a good quality protein food. In conclusion, substitution of wheat-based muffins with soy and lupin flour increased the protein content of wheat-based muffins but protein digestibility and overall protein quality was similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":20751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665124000673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protein-rich animal foods are highly digestible, high-quality sources or protein, whereas the protein quality of plant-based foods can vary considerably. Given the growing interest in alternative non-animal-based sources of protein, it is important to establish the protein digestibility of these new foods and protein concentrates which have important health implications especially for vulnerable groups who don’t consume sufficient dietary protein. The human ileostomy model is ideal for measuring protein digestibility as it enables protein digestion to be quantified independent of protein degradation in the large intestine. The aim of this study was to determine the protein digestibility and quality of a wheat-based food containing legume flours. This randomised, double-blinded, controlled cross-over intervention was conducted in 4 proctocolectomised adults with conventional and well-functioning permanent ileostomies. The study was conducted over 2 weeks and on each testing day, the participant consumed 2 test muffins (125 g each) or 2 protein-free cookies in the morning (breakfast and morning tea) followed by a standardised low-protein lunch and afternoon tea. Test muffins were made using a standard muffin recipe using wheat flour and for 2 of the test muffins 50% of the flour was substituted with soy or lupin flour. An indigestible marker, titanium dioxide was added to the muffins so that the completeness of muffin recovered in ileal digesta could be calculated. The digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) was determined by comparing concentrations of true ileal digestible indispensable amino acids to recommended amino acid requirements(1). Data was reported as mean ± SD and repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare means between treatment groups with significance reported at P < 0.05. Substituting 50% of wheat flour in muffins with soy or lupin flour doubled the protein content of muffins (soy 11.8 g/100g and lupin 10.6 g/100g) compared to muffins that only contained wheat flour (wheat 5.1 g/100g). However, substituting wheat with legume flour did not affect protein digestibility which was similar for all muffin types; wheat (76.8 ± 7.0%), soy (77.9 ± 7.4%) and lupin (81.6 ± 6.9%) (P = 0.181). The DIAAS values for all muffins were below 75% which is classified as the cut off for a good quality protein food. In conclusion, substitution of wheat-based muffins with soy and lupin flour increased the protein content of wheat-based muffins but protein digestibility and overall protein quality was similar.

评估用豆类面粉替代小麦粉对回肠造口术健康成人回肠氨基酸消化率的影响
富含蛋白质的动物性食品是高度易消化的优质蛋白质来源,而植物性食品的蛋白质质量则有很大差异。鉴于人们对非动物性蛋白质替代来源的兴趣与日俱增,因此确定这些新食品和浓缩蛋白质的蛋白质消化率非常重要,因为它们对健康有着重要影响,尤其是对膳食蛋白质摄入不足的弱势群体而言。人体回肠造口术模型是测量蛋白质消化率的理想方法,因为它可以对蛋白质消化进行量化,而不受大肠中蛋白质降解的影响。这项研究的目的是确定含有豆类面粉的小麦食品的蛋白质消化率和质量。这项随机、双盲、对照、交叉干预研究在 4 名直肠切除的成年人中进行,他们都接受了常规和功能良好的永久性回肠造口术。研究为期两周,在每个测试日,受试者上午食用 2 块测试松饼(每块 125 克)或 2 块无蛋白质饼干(早餐和早茶),然后食用标准化低蛋白午餐和下午茶。测试松饼采用标准松饼配方,使用小麦粉制作,其中 2 个测试松饼的 50%面粉用大豆或羽扇豆粉代替。在松饼中添加了一种不可消化的标记物--二氧化钛,以便计算松饼在回肠消化物中的完全回收率。可消化不可缺少氨基酸得分(DIAAS)是通过比较真正回肠消化不可缺少氨基酸的浓度和推荐的氨基酸需要量(1)来确定的。数据以平均值 ± SD 表示,重复测量方差分析用于比较处理组间的平均值,显著性以 P < 0.05 表示。与只含小麦粉的松饼(小麦 5.1 克/100 克)相比,用大豆或羽扇豆粉替代松饼中 50%的小麦粉可使松饼的蛋白质含量增加一倍(大豆 11.8 克/100 克,羽扇豆 10.6 克/100 克)。然而,用豆类面粉代替小麦并不影响蛋白质消化率,所有松饼类型的蛋白质消化率相似:小麦(76.8 ± 7.0%)、大豆(77.9 ± 7.4%)和羽扇豆(81.6 ± 6.9%)(P = 0.181)。所有松饼的 DIAAS 值均低于 75%,而这是优质蛋白质食品的临界值。总之,用大豆粉和羽扇豆粉替代小麦松饼会增加小麦松饼的蛋白质含量,但蛋白质消化率和整体蛋白质质量相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society publishes papers and abstracts presented by members and invited speakers at the scientific meetings of The Nutrition Society. The journal provides an invaluable record of the scientific research currently being undertaken, contributing to ''the scientific study of nutrition and its application to the maintenance of human and animal health.'' The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and clinical practice workers in both human and animal nutrition and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信