Zhongpeng Wang, Xiaoxin Song, Long Chen, Jinxiang Nan, Yulin Sun, Meijun Pang, Kuo Zhang, Xiuyun Liu, Dong Ming
{"title":"Research progress of epileptic seizure prediction methods based on EEG","authors":"Zhongpeng Wang, Xiaoxin Song, Long Chen, Jinxiang Nan, Yulin Sun, Meijun Pang, Kuo Zhang, Xiuyun Liu, Dong Ming","doi":"10.1007/s11571-024-10109-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>At present, at least 30% of refractory epilepsy patients in the world cannot be effectively controlled and treated. The suddenness and unpredictability of seizures greatly affect the physical and mental health and even the life safety of patients, and the realization of early prediction of seizures and the adoption of interventions are of great significance to the improvement of patients’ quality of life. In this paper, we firstly introduce the design process of EEG-based seizure prediction methods, introduce several databases commonly used in the research, and summarize the commonly used methods in pre-processing, feature extraction, classification and identification, and post-processing. Then, based on scalp EEG and intracranial EEG respectively, we reviewed the current status of epileptic seizure prediction research from five commonly used feature analysis methods, and make a comprehensive evaluation of both. Finally, this paper describes the reasons why the current algorithms cannot be applied to the clinic, summarizes their limitations, and gives corresponding suggestions, aiming to provide improvement directions for subsequent research. In addition, deep learning algorithms have emerged in recent years, and this paper also compares the advantages and disadvantages of deep learning algorithms with traditional machine learning methods, in the hope of providing researchers with new technologies and new ideas and making significant breakthroughs in the field of epileptic seizure prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10109-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
At present, at least 30% of refractory epilepsy patients in the world cannot be effectively controlled and treated. The suddenness and unpredictability of seizures greatly affect the physical and mental health and even the life safety of patients, and the realization of early prediction of seizures and the adoption of interventions are of great significance to the improvement of patients’ quality of life. In this paper, we firstly introduce the design process of EEG-based seizure prediction methods, introduce several databases commonly used in the research, and summarize the commonly used methods in pre-processing, feature extraction, classification and identification, and post-processing. Then, based on scalp EEG and intracranial EEG respectively, we reviewed the current status of epileptic seizure prediction research from five commonly used feature analysis methods, and make a comprehensive evaluation of both. Finally, this paper describes the reasons why the current algorithms cannot be applied to the clinic, summarizes their limitations, and gives corresponding suggestions, aiming to provide improvement directions for subsequent research. In addition, deep learning algorithms have emerged in recent years, and this paper also compares the advantages and disadvantages of deep learning algorithms with traditional machine learning methods, in the hope of providing researchers with new technologies and new ideas and making significant breakthroughs in the field of epileptic seizure prediction.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models.
The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome.
The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged.
1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics.
2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages.
3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.