Capturing students’ LMS experience: measurement invariance across Chinese and English versions

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Juming Jiang, Patricia D. Simon, Luke K. Fryer
{"title":"Capturing students’ LMS experience: measurement invariance across Chinese and English versions","authors":"Juming Jiang, Patricia D. Simon, Luke K. Fryer","doi":"10.1007/s12528-024-09402-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Learning management systems (LMS) have emerged as a standard component of higher education institutions for the web-based delivery and management of courses. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the value of LMS in facilitating online teaching and learning. However, the significance of examining the factors that impact LMS use success during the pandemic has been underestimated. Moreover, despite previous attempts to evaluate students’ LMS experience, most research failed to connect the actual use of LMS to students’ learning success. To address these gaps, we developed and validated an empirical and theory-based instrument measuring students’ LMS experience. The choice of constructs was informed by a scoping review of LMS measures and interviews with a representative sample of students and teachers about their LMS use. By adding constructs that are relevant to learning in the LMS, the current study provided a more comprehensive measurement that captures students’ learning experience in the platform. We provided evidence for the measurement invariance of the scales with their Chinese translation as well. By addressing the limitations and building on this study’s findings, researchers can further advance our understanding of LMS experiences and contribute to developing more effective e-learning systems to support teaching and learning in higher education.</p>","PeriodicalId":15404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09402-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning management systems (LMS) have emerged as a standard component of higher education institutions for the web-based delivery and management of courses. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the value of LMS in facilitating online teaching and learning. However, the significance of examining the factors that impact LMS use success during the pandemic has been underestimated. Moreover, despite previous attempts to evaluate students’ LMS experience, most research failed to connect the actual use of LMS to students’ learning success. To address these gaps, we developed and validated an empirical and theory-based instrument measuring students’ LMS experience. The choice of constructs was informed by a scoping review of LMS measures and interviews with a representative sample of students and teachers about their LMS use. By adding constructs that are relevant to learning in the LMS, the current study provided a more comprehensive measurement that captures students’ learning experience in the platform. We provided evidence for the measurement invariance of the scales with their Chinese translation as well. By addressing the limitations and building on this study’s findings, researchers can further advance our understanding of LMS experiences and contribute to developing more effective e-learning systems to support teaching and learning in higher education.

捕捉学生的 LMS 体验:中英文版本的测量不变性
学习管理系统(LMS)已成为高等教育机构基于网络提供和管理课程的标准组成部分。COVID-19 大流行凸显了学习管理系统在促进在线教学和学习方面的价值。然而,人们低估了研究影响大流行期间成功使用 LMS 的因素的重要性。此外,尽管以前尝试过评估学生的 LMS 体验,但大多数研究都未能将 LMS 的实际使用与学生的学习成功联系起来。为了弥补这些不足,我们开发并验证了一种基于经验和理论的工具,用于测量学生的 LMS 体验。我们对 LMS 测量方法进行了范围审查,并就 LMS 的使用情况采访了具有代表性的学生和教师。通过添加与 LMS 学习相关的构念,本研究提供了一种更全面的测量方法,以捕捉学生在平台中的学习体验。我们还提供了量表与中文翻译量表测量不变性的证据。通过解决这些局限性并在本研究结果的基础上继续努力,研究人员可以进一步推动我们对 LMS 体验的理解,并为开发更有效的电子学习系统以支持高等教育中的教学做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Journal of Computing in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Journal of Computing in Higher Education (JCHE) contributes to our understanding of the design, development, and implementation of instructional processes and technologies in higher education. JCHE publishes original research, literature reviews, implementation and evaluation studies, and theoretical, conceptual, and policy papers that provide perspectives on instructional technology’s role in improving access, affordability, and outcomes of postsecondary education.  Priority is given to well-documented original papers that demonstrate a strong grounding in learning theory and/or rigorous educational research design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信