Method myopia

IF 2.5 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Alan P. Ker
{"title":"Method myopia","authors":"Alan P. Ker","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Method myopia is defined as theoretical rhetoric absent empirical discernment regarding flavor-of-the-day econometric methodologies. This Fellows Address discusses why method myopia is pervasive, what factors contribute to the pervasiveness, why is likely it to increase, and finally, a possible remedy. To that end, incentive structures facing researchers, reviewers, and editors are considered within the life-cycle of a typical econometric methodology. Considering our discipline is empirically driven, there are potentially large costs by using flavor-of-the-day methodologies when an alternative -- possibly leading to different economic results and policy responses -- is the appropriate method. Furthermore, method myopia can notably restrict the set of research problems examined thereby creating additional, potentially large, opportunity costs. Finally, over-selling the superiority/completeness/correctness of results from such flavor-of-the-day methodologies to policy makers can not only be costly in the particular case, but can undermine the long-term credibility of our disciplinary advice to policy makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55291,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie","volume":"72 2","pages":"199-204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cjag.12348","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cjag.12348","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Method myopia is defined as theoretical rhetoric absent empirical discernment regarding flavor-of-the-day econometric methodologies. This Fellows Address discusses why method myopia is pervasive, what factors contribute to the pervasiveness, why is likely it to increase, and finally, a possible remedy. To that end, incentive structures facing researchers, reviewers, and editors are considered within the life-cycle of a typical econometric methodology. Considering our discipline is empirically driven, there are potentially large costs by using flavor-of-the-day methodologies when an alternative -- possibly leading to different economic results and policy responses -- is the appropriate method. Furthermore, method myopia can notably restrict the set of research problems examined thereby creating additional, potentially large, opportunity costs. Finally, over-selling the superiority/completeness/correctness of results from such flavor-of-the-day methodologies to policy makers can not only be costly in the particular case, but can undermine the long-term credibility of our disciplinary advice to policy makers.

Abstract Image

近视方法
方法近视被定义为对时下流行的计量经济学方法缺乏经验鉴别力的理论空谈。本研究报告讨论了方法近视为何普遍存在、哪些因素导致了方法近视的普遍存在、方法近视为何有可能加剧,以及最后可能的补救措施。为此,我们将在典型计量经济学方法论的生命周期内考虑研究人员、审稿人和编辑所面临的激励结构。考虑到我们的学科是以经验为驱动力的,因此,当另一种方法--可能导致不同的经济结果和政策反应--是合适的方法时,使用时下流行的方法可能会带来巨大的成本。此外,方法近视会明显限制研究问题的范围,从而产生额外的、潜在的巨大机会成本。最后,向政策制定者过度推销这种时髦方法所得出结果的优越性/完整性/正确性,不仅会在特定情况下付出高昂代价,而且会损害我们向政策制定者提供的学科建议的长期可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
1.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie (CJAE) serves as a platform for scholarly research in agricultural, resource, and environmental economics, covering topics such as agri-food, agri-business, policy, resource utilization, and environmental impacts. It publishes a range of theoretical, applied and policy-related articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信