Ethics-based AI auditing: A systematic literature review on conceptualizations of ethical principles and knowledge contributions to stakeholders

IF 8.2 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Joakim Laine, Matti Minkkinen, Matti Mäntymäki
{"title":"Ethics-based AI auditing: A systematic literature review on conceptualizations of ethical principles and knowledge contributions to stakeholders","authors":"Joakim Laine,&nbsp;Matti Minkkinen,&nbsp;Matti Mäntymäki","doi":"10.1016/j.im.2024.103969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic literature review synthesizes the conceptualizations of ethical principles in AI auditing literature and the knowledge contributions to the stakeholders of AI auditing. We explain how the literature discusses fairness, transparency, non-maleficence, responsibility, privacy, trust, beneficence, and freedom/autonomy. Conceptualizations vary along social/technical- and process/outcome-oriented dimensions. The main stakeholders of ethics-based AI auditing are system developers and deployers, the wider public, researchers, auditors, AI system users, and regulators. AI auditing provides three types of knowledge contributions to stakeholders: 1) guidance; 2) methods, tools, and frameworks; and 3) awareness and empowerment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56291,"journal":{"name":"Information & Management","volume":"61 5","pages":"Article 103969"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037872062400051X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic literature review synthesizes the conceptualizations of ethical principles in AI auditing literature and the knowledge contributions to the stakeholders of AI auditing. We explain how the literature discusses fairness, transparency, non-maleficence, responsibility, privacy, trust, beneficence, and freedom/autonomy. Conceptualizations vary along social/technical- and process/outcome-oriented dimensions. The main stakeholders of ethics-based AI auditing are system developers and deployers, the wider public, researchers, auditors, AI system users, and regulators. AI auditing provides three types of knowledge contributions to stakeholders: 1) guidance; 2) methods, tools, and frameworks; and 3) awareness and empowerment.

基于伦理的人工智能审计:关于伦理原则概念化和对利益相关者的知识贡献的系统文献综述
本系统性文献综述综合了人工智能审计文献中对伦理原则的概念化以及对人工智能审计利益相关者的知识贡献。我们解释了文献是如何讨论公平、透明、非恶意、责任、隐私、信任、受益和自由/自主的。这些概念在以社会/技术和过程/结果为导向的维度上各不相同。基于伦理的人工智能审计的主要利益相关者包括系统开发者和部署者、广大公众、研究人员、审计人员、人工智能系统用户和监管机构。人工智能审计为利益相关者提供三类知识贡献:1)指导;2)方法、工具和框架;3)认识和赋权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information & Management
Information & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Information & Management is a publication that caters to researchers in the field of information systems as well as managers, professionals, administrators, and senior executives involved in designing, implementing, and managing Information Systems Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信