Resection and reconstruction of the largest abdominal vein system (the inferior vena cava, hepatic, and portal vein): a narrative review.

IF 3.8 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Translational gastroenterology and hepatology Pub Date : 2024-03-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.21037/tgh-23-90
Junichi Kaneko, Yoshihiro Hayashi, Yusuke Kazami, Yujiro Nishioka, Akinori Miyata, Akihiko Ichida, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Kiyoshi Hasegawa
{"title":"Resection and reconstruction of the largest abdominal vein system (the inferior vena cava, hepatic, and portal vein): a narrative review.","authors":"Junichi Kaneko, Yoshihiro Hayashi, Yusuke Kazami, Yujiro Nishioka, Akinori Miyata, Akihiko Ichida, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Kiyoshi Hasegawa","doi":"10.21037/tgh-23-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>As tumors invade major abdominal veins, surgical procedures are transformed from simple and basic to complicated and challenging. In this narrative review, we focus on what is currently known and not known regarding the technical aspects of major abdominal venous resection and its reconstruction, patency, and oncologic benefit in a cross-cutting perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Semantic Scholar from inception up to October 18, 2023. We reviewed 106 papers by title, abstract, and full text regarding resection or reconstruction of the inferior vena cava, hepatic vein confluence, portal vein (PV), and middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in a cross-cutting perspective.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>The oncologic benefit of aggressive hepatic vein resection with suitable reconstruction against adenocarcinoma remains unclear, and further studies are required to clarify this point. A superior mesenteric/PV resection is now a universal, indispensable, and effective procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Although many case series using tailor-made autologous venous grafts have been reported, not only size mismatch but also additional surgical incisions and a longer operation time remain obstacles for venous reconstruction. The use of autologous alternative tissue remains only an alternative procedure because the patency rate of customized tubular conduit type to interpose or replace the resected vein is not known. Unlike arterial replacement, venous replacement using synthetic vascular grafts is still rarely reported and there are several inherent limitations except for reconstruction of tributaries of MHV in LDLT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Various approaches to abdominal vein resection and replacement or reconstruction are technically feasible with satisfactory results. Synthetic vascular grafts may be appropriate but have a certain rate of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94362,"journal":{"name":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11074493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-23-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: As tumors invade major abdominal veins, surgical procedures are transformed from simple and basic to complicated and challenging. In this narrative review, we focus on what is currently known and not known regarding the technical aspects of major abdominal venous resection and its reconstruction, patency, and oncologic benefit in a cross-cutting perspective.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Semantic Scholar from inception up to October 18, 2023. We reviewed 106 papers by title, abstract, and full text regarding resection or reconstruction of the inferior vena cava, hepatic vein confluence, portal vein (PV), and middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in a cross-cutting perspective.

Key content and findings: The oncologic benefit of aggressive hepatic vein resection with suitable reconstruction against adenocarcinoma remains unclear, and further studies are required to clarify this point. A superior mesenteric/PV resection is now a universal, indispensable, and effective procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Although many case series using tailor-made autologous venous grafts have been reported, not only size mismatch but also additional surgical incisions and a longer operation time remain obstacles for venous reconstruction. The use of autologous alternative tissue remains only an alternative procedure because the patency rate of customized tubular conduit type to interpose or replace the resected vein is not known. Unlike arterial replacement, venous replacement using synthetic vascular grafts is still rarely reported and there are several inherent limitations except for reconstruction of tributaries of MHV in LDLT.

Conclusions: Various approaches to abdominal vein resection and replacement or reconstruction are technically feasible with satisfactory results. Synthetic vascular grafts may be appropriate but have a certain rate of complications.

腹腔最大静脉系统(下腔静脉、肝静脉和门静脉)的切除和重建:综述。
背景和目的:随着肿瘤侵犯腹腔大静脉,外科手术也从简单、基本转变为复杂和具有挑战性。在这篇叙事性综述中,我们从横向视角关注腹腔大静脉切除术及其重建、通畅性和肿瘤治疗效果的技术方面目前已知和未知的内容:我们在 PubMed 和 Semantic Scholar 上进行了系统的文献检索,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 10 月 18 日。我们通过标题、摘要和全文对106篇论文进行了综述,内容涉及活体肝移植(LDLT)中下腔静脉、肝静脉汇合处、门静脉(PV)和肝中静脉(MHV)支流的切除或重建:积极的肝静脉切除并进行适当的重建对腺癌的肿瘤学益处仍不明确,需要进一步的研究来澄清这一点。上肠系膜/肝静脉切除术是目前治疗胰腺导管腺癌的普遍、不可或缺且有效的手术。虽然已有许多使用定制自体静脉移植物的病例报道,但静脉重建的障碍不仅是大小不匹配,还有额外的手术切口和较长的手术时间。使用自体替代组织仍然只是一种替代手术,因为定制的管状导管类型用于插入或替代切除的静脉的通畅率尚无定论。与动脉置换不同,使用合成血管移植物进行静脉置换的报道仍然很少,而且除了在 LDLT 中重建 MHV 支流外,还存在一些固有的局限性:结论:腹腔静脉切除、置换或重建的各种方法在技术上都是可行的,且效果令人满意。结论:各种腹腔静脉切除、置换或重建方法在技术上都是可行的,且效果令人满意。合成血管移植可能是合适的方法,但有一定的并发症发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信