The Socket Shield Technique: Stability of the Buccal Peri-implant Bone after Partial Root Removal - A Prospective Case Series of 20 patients, with 18 Months Follow-up.

Rutger A L Dhondt, Pierre Lahoud, Manoetjer Siawasch, Ana B Castro, Marc Quirynen, Andy Temmerman
{"title":"The Socket Shield Technique: Stability of the Buccal Peri-implant Bone after Partial Root Removal - A Prospective Case Series of 20 patients, with 18 Months Follow-up.","authors":"Rutger A L Dhondt, Pierre Lahoud, Manoetjer Siawasch, Ana B Castro, Marc Quirynen, Andy Temmerman","doi":"10.11607/prd.6989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to collect data on implant survival, bone volume maintenance, and complications associated with the socket shield technique.</p><p><strong>Background data: </strong>The socket shield technique was introduced in 2010. Since then, several systematic reviews have been published, showing good clinical outcomes. The behaviour of the buccal bone plate is so far not completely understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved the placement of 23 implants using the socket shield technique in 20 patients. AstraTech EV implants were used, and no bone substitutes or connective tissue grafts were applied. Patients were monitored for 18 months, recording implant survival, volumetric bone analysis on CBCT scans, interproximal bone levels, bone sounding, pink esthetic scores, and complications. Prosthetic procedures were also described, including temporary and final restorations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 95.7% cumulative 18-month implant survival rate was obtained using the socket shield technique, with a significant but limited reduction in buccal bone thickness (BBT) after implant placement. One implant did not integrate and two shields were partially exposed. The mean pink esthetic score, 1 year after loading was 12.93 ± 1.22.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that the socket shield technique can result in limited reduction of the buccal bone volume, with a high implant survival rate. Re-entry studies are recommended to investigate the causes of bone resorption.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to collect data on implant survival, bone volume maintenance, and complications associated with the socket shield technique.

Background data: The socket shield technique was introduced in 2010. Since then, several systematic reviews have been published, showing good clinical outcomes. The behaviour of the buccal bone plate is so far not completely understood.

Methods: The study involved the placement of 23 implants using the socket shield technique in 20 patients. AstraTech EV implants were used, and no bone substitutes or connective tissue grafts were applied. Patients were monitored for 18 months, recording implant survival, volumetric bone analysis on CBCT scans, interproximal bone levels, bone sounding, pink esthetic scores, and complications. Prosthetic procedures were also described, including temporary and final restorations.

Results: A 95.7% cumulative 18-month implant survival rate was obtained using the socket shield technique, with a significant but limited reduction in buccal bone thickness (BBT) after implant placement. One implant did not integrate and two shields were partially exposed. The mean pink esthetic score, 1 year after loading was 12.93 ± 1.22.

Conclusion: The study suggests that the socket shield technique can result in limited reduction of the buccal bone volume, with a high implant survival rate. Re-entry studies are recommended to investigate the causes of bone resorption.

窝沟封闭技术:部分牙根去除后颊面种植体周围骨的稳定性--20 例患者的前瞻性病例系列,18 个月随访。
目的:本研究旨在收集有关种植体存活率、骨量维持以及与牙槽屏蔽技术相关的并发症的数据:本研究旨在收集有关种植体存活率、骨量维持以及与牙槽盾技术相关的并发症的数据:承插口护罩技术于 2010 年引入。背景资料:窝沟封闭技术于 2010 年推出,此后发表了多篇系统性综述,显示出良好的临床效果。迄今为止,人们对颊骨板的行为还不完全了解:研究涉及 20 名患者,使用窝沟封闭技术植入 23 个种植体。使用的是 AstraTech EV 种植体,没有使用骨替代物或结缔组织移植。对患者进行了长达 18 个月的监测,记录了种植体的存活率、CBCT 扫描的骨量分析、近侧骨水平、骨发声、粉色美学评分和并发症。同时还描述了修复过程,包括临时修复和最终修复:种植体植入后,颊骨厚度(BBT)显著降低,但降低幅度有限。有一个种植体没有整合,两个盾牌部分外露。种植体植入 1 年后的平均粉色美学评分为 12.93 ± 1.22:研究表明,窝沟封闭技术可以有限地减少颊侧骨量,同时具有较高的种植体存活率。建议进行再入路研究,以调查骨吸收的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信