María Cantero-Gómez, Jorge Vicente-Sanchez, María Dolores Oteo-Calatayud, Wenceslao Piedra-Cascón, Carlos Oteo-Morilla
{"title":"Comparative Clinical Study of Two Tooth-Whitening Protocols: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Part 2.","authors":"María Cantero-Gómez, Jorge Vicente-Sanchez, María Dolores Oteo-Calatayud, Wenceslao Piedra-Cascón, Carlos Oteo-Morilla","doi":"10.11607/prd.7106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study clinically evaluated the efficacy of two different home tooth-whitening protocols to determine which one is more effective by applying the whitening gel every 48 hours or every 72 hours for 6 weeks. The differences in tooth sensitivity were also analyzed. A sample of 72 patients were randomly divided into four groups: In group A (n = 24), 16% carbamide peroxide (Pola Night, SDI Limited) was applied every 48 hours for 6 weeks; in group B (n = 24), 16% carbamide peroxide was applied every 72 hours for 6 weeks; in group C (control; n = 12), a placebo gel without peroxide (glycerin gel) was applied every 48 hours for 6 weeks; and in group D (control; n = 12), a placebo gel without peroxide (glycerin gel) was applied every 72 hours for 6 weeks. To compare the groups, color measurements were made using a spectrophotometer. For statistical analysis, ANOVA with Bonferroni test was used. The confidence interval (CI) was set at 95% (P ≤ .05). No statistically significant differences were found between applying 16% carbamide peroxide every 48 hours and every 72 hours for 6 weeks (P > .05). The study concluded that 16% carbamide peroxide was equally effective when applied using both protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study clinically evaluated the efficacy of two different home tooth-whitening protocols to determine which one is more effective by applying the whitening gel every 48 hours or every 72 hours for 6 weeks. The differences in tooth sensitivity were also analyzed. A sample of 72 patients were randomly divided into four groups: In group A (n = 24), 16% carbamide peroxide (Pola Night, SDI Limited) was applied every 48 hours for 6 weeks; in group B (n = 24), 16% carbamide peroxide was applied every 72 hours for 6 weeks; in group C (control; n = 12), a placebo gel without peroxide (glycerin gel) was applied every 48 hours for 6 weeks; and in group D (control; n = 12), a placebo gel without peroxide (glycerin gel) was applied every 72 hours for 6 weeks. To compare the groups, color measurements were made using a spectrophotometer. For statistical analysis, ANOVA with Bonferroni test was used. The confidence interval (CI) was set at 95% (P ≤ .05). No statistically significant differences were found between applying 16% carbamide peroxide every 48 hours and every 72 hours for 6 weeks (P > .05). The study concluded that 16% carbamide peroxide was equally effective when applied using both protocols.