Food Environment in Burkina Faso: Review of Public Policies and Government Actions Using the Food-EPI Tool.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Viviane Aurelie Tapsoba, Ella W R Compaore, Augustin Nawidimbasba Zeba, Jerome Winbetourefa Some, Inoussa Ky, Julien Soliba Manga, Adama Diouf, Jean-Claude Moubarac, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Mamoudou H Dicko
{"title":"Food Environment in Burkina Faso: Review of Public Policies and Government Actions Using the Food-EPI Tool.","authors":"Viviane Aurelie Tapsoba, Ella W R Compaore, Augustin Nawidimbasba Zeba, Jerome Winbetourefa Some, Inoussa Ky, Julien Soliba Manga, Adama Diouf, Jean-Claude Moubarac, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Mamoudou H Dicko","doi":"10.1177/03795721241248214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Governments have a central role to play in creating a food environment that will enable people to have and maintain healthy eating practices.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study analyzes public policies and government actions related to creating healthy food environments in Burkina Faso.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index tool used for this study has 2 components, 13 domains, and 56 indicators of good practice adapted to the Burkina Faso context. Official policy documents collected from data sources such as government and nongovernment websites, and through interviews with government and nongovernment resource persons, provided evidence of considerations of food environment in public policy documents in Burkina Faso.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Policies documents show a lack of revision of old texts and administrative processes for new policies and government practices are very slow. Added to this is the absence of a regulatory document for some implemented actions. The analysis of the documents collected in relation to the indicators of Food-Epi tool shows that there is no evidence of consideration of food environments for the indicators concerning the regulation of nutrition and health claims, labeling, taxes on healthy and unhealthy foods, support systems for training for private structures on healthy diets, implementation of food guidelines, and food trade and investment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study permits a review of public policies that take into account food environments through the various indicators and constitutes a starting point from which improvements can be made by the government.</p>","PeriodicalId":12394,"journal":{"name":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721241248214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Governments have a central role to play in creating a food environment that will enable people to have and maintain healthy eating practices.

Objectives: This study analyzes public policies and government actions related to creating healthy food environments in Burkina Faso.

Methods: The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index tool used for this study has 2 components, 13 domains, and 56 indicators of good practice adapted to the Burkina Faso context. Official policy documents collected from data sources such as government and nongovernment websites, and through interviews with government and nongovernment resource persons, provided evidence of considerations of food environment in public policy documents in Burkina Faso.

Results: Policies documents show a lack of revision of old texts and administrative processes for new policies and government practices are very slow. Added to this is the absence of a regulatory document for some implemented actions. The analysis of the documents collected in relation to the indicators of Food-Epi tool shows that there is no evidence of consideration of food environments for the indicators concerning the regulation of nutrition and health claims, labeling, taxes on healthy and unhealthy foods, support systems for training for private structures on healthy diets, implementation of food guidelines, and food trade and investment.

Conclusion: This study permits a review of public policies that take into account food environments through the various indicators and constitutes a starting point from which improvements can be made by the government.

布基纳法索的粮食环境:使用食品环境指数工具审查公共政策和政府行动。
背景:政府在创造食品环境,使人们能够拥有并保持健康饮食习惯方面发挥着核心作用:本研究分析了布基纳法索与创造健康食品环境有关的公共政策和政府行动:本研究使用的 "健康食品环境政策指数 "工具包含 2 个组成部分、13 个领域和 56 个良好做法指标,并根据布基纳法索的具体情况进行了调整。从政府和非政府网站等数据源收集的官方政策文件,以及对政府和非政府专家的访谈,提供了布基纳法索公共政策文件对食品环境考虑的证据:结果:政策文件显示缺乏对旧文本的修订,新政策的行政程序和政府做法非常缓慢。此外,一些已实施的行动缺乏规范性文件。对收集到的与 Food-Epi 工具指标相关的文件进行的分析表明,在有关营养和健康声明的监管、标签、健康食品和不健康食品的税收、对私营机构进行健康饮食培训的支持系统、食品指南的实施以及食品贸易和投资等指标方面,没有证据表明对食品环境进行了考虑:这项研究通过各种指标对考虑到食品环境的公共政策进行了审查,为政府改进工作提供了一个起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Food and Nutrition Bulletin 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB,) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation. The Journal is one of the leading resources used by researchers, academics, nutrition policy makers and planners in over 125 countries to obtain the most current research and policy information related to nutrition in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信