Prediction of 6-Mo Poststroke Spasticity in Patients With Acute First-Ever Stroke by Machine Learning.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Lilin Chen, Shimei Cheng, Shouyi Liang, Yonghao Song, Jinshuo Chen, Tingting Lei, Zhenhong Liang, Haiqing Zheng
{"title":"Prediction of 6-Mo Poststroke Spasticity in Patients With Acute First-Ever Stroke by Machine Learning.","authors":"Lilin Chen, Shimei Cheng, Shouyi Liang, Yonghao Song, Jinshuo Chen, Tingting Lei, Zhenhong Liang, Haiqing Zheng","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Poststroke spasticity reduces arm function and leads to low levels of independence. This study suggested applying machine learning from routinely available data to support the clinical management of poststroke spasticity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>One hundred seventy-two patients with acute first-ever stroke were included in this prospective cohort study. Twenty clinical information and rehabilitation assessments were obtained to train various machine learning algorithms for predicting 6-mo poststroke spasticity defined by a modified Ashworth scale score ≥1. Factors significantly relevant were also defined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study results indicated that multivariate adaptive regression spline (area under the curve value: 0.916; 95% confidence interval: 0.906-0.923), adaptive boosting (area under the curve: 0.962; 95% confidence interval: 0.952-0.973), random forest (area under the curve: 0.975; 95% confidence interval: 0.968-0.981), support vector machine (area under the curve: 0.980; 95% confidence interval: 0.970-0.989), and outperformed the traditional logistic model (area under the curve: 0.897; 95% confidence interval: 0.884-0.910) ( P < 0.05). Among all of the algorithms, the random forest and support vector machine models outperformed the others ( P < 0.05). Fugl-Meyer Assessment score, days in hospital, age, stroke location, and paretic side were the most important features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that machine learning algorithms can help augment clinical decision-making processes for the assessment of poststroke spasticity occurrence, which may enhance the efficacy of management for patients with poststroke spasticity in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1123-1129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Poststroke spasticity reduces arm function and leads to low levels of independence. This study suggested applying machine learning from routinely available data to support the clinical management of poststroke spasticity.

Design: One hundred seventy-two patients with acute first-ever stroke were included in this prospective cohort study. Twenty clinical information and rehabilitation assessments were obtained to train various machine learning algorithms for predicting 6-mo poststroke spasticity defined by a modified Ashworth scale score ≥1. Factors significantly relevant were also defined.

Results: The study results indicated that multivariate adaptive regression spline (area under the curve value: 0.916; 95% confidence interval: 0.906-0.923), adaptive boosting (area under the curve: 0.962; 95% confidence interval: 0.952-0.973), random forest (area under the curve: 0.975; 95% confidence interval: 0.968-0.981), support vector machine (area under the curve: 0.980; 95% confidence interval: 0.970-0.989), and outperformed the traditional logistic model (area under the curve: 0.897; 95% confidence interval: 0.884-0.910) ( P < 0.05). Among all of the algorithms, the random forest and support vector machine models outperformed the others ( P < 0.05). Fugl-Meyer Assessment score, days in hospital, age, stroke location, and paretic side were the most important features.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that machine learning algorithms can help augment clinical decision-making processes for the assessment of poststroke spasticity occurrence, which may enhance the efficacy of management for patients with poststroke spasticity in the future.

通过机器学习预测急性首次脑卒中患者卒中后 6 个月的痉挛情况。
目的:脑卒中后痉挛(PSS)会降低手臂功能,导致患者独立性低下。本研究建议从常规可用数据中应用机器学习(ML)来支持 PSS 的临床管理。这项前瞻性队列研究共纳入了 172 名急性首次脑卒中患者,研究人员获取了 20 项临床信息和康复评估,以训练各种 ML 算法来预测 6 个月的 PSS(定义为改良阿什沃斯量表(MAS)评分≥ 1)。同时还定义了明显相关的因素:研究结果表明,多变量自适应回归样条曲线(曲线下面积(AUC)值:0.916;95% 置信区间(CI):0.906-0.923)、自适应提升(AUC:0.962;95% CI:0.952-0.973)、随机森林(RF)(AUC:0.975;95% CI:0.968-0.981)、支持向量机(SVM)(AUC:0.980;95% CI:0.970-0.989)的表现优于传统的逻辑模型(AUC:0.897;95% CI:0.884-0.910)(P < 0.05)。在所有算法中,RF 和 SVM 模型的表现优于其他算法(P < 0.05)。FMA评分、住院天数、年龄、卒中位置和瘫痪侧是最重要的特征:这些研究结果表明,ML 算法有助于增强评估 PSS 发生情况的临床决策过程,从而在未来提高 PSS 患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信