Modern Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modalities to Advance Neuroimaging in Astronauts.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Lila Berger, Ford Burles, Tejdeep Jaswal, Rebecca Williams, Giuseppe Iaria
{"title":"Modern Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modalities to Advance Neuroimaging in Astronauts.","authors":"Lila Berger, Ford Burles, Tejdeep Jaswal, Rebecca Williams, Giuseppe Iaria","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6395.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> The rapid development of the space industry requires a deeper understanding of spaceflight's impact on the brain. MRI research reports brain volume changes following spaceflight in astronauts, potentially affecting cognition. Recently, we have demonstrated that this evidence of volumetric changes, as measured by typical T1-weighted sequences (e.g., magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence; MPRAGE), is error-prone due to the microgravity-related redistribution of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain. More modern neuroimaging methods, particularly dual-echo MPRAGE (DEMPRAGE) and magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence utilizing two inversion pulses (MP2RAGE), have been suggested to be resilient to this error. Here, we tested if these imaging modalities offered consistent segmentation performance improvements in some commonly employed neuroimaging software packages.<b>METHODS:</b> We conducted manual gray matter tissue segmentation in traditional T1w MRI images to utilize for comparison. Automated tissue segmentation was performed for traditional T1w imaging, as well as on DEMPRAGE and MP2RAGE images from the same subjects. Statistical analysis involved a comparison of total gray matter volumes for each modality, and the extent of tissue segmentation agreement was assessed using a test of similarity (Dice coefficient).<b>RESULTS:</b> Neither DEMPRAGE nor MP2RAGE exhibited consistent segmentation performance across all toolboxes tested.<b>DISCUSSION:</b> This research indicates that customized data collection and processing methods are necessary for reliable and valid structural MRI segmentation in astronauts, as current methods provide erroneous classification and hence inaccurate claims of neuroplastic brain changes in the astronaut population.<b>Berger L, Burles F, Jaswal T, Williams R, Iaria G. <i>Modern magnetic resonance imaging modalities to advance neuroimaging in astronauts</i>. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(5):245-253.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"95 5","pages":"245-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6395.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The rapid development of the space industry requires a deeper understanding of spaceflight's impact on the brain. MRI research reports brain volume changes following spaceflight in astronauts, potentially affecting cognition. Recently, we have demonstrated that this evidence of volumetric changes, as measured by typical T1-weighted sequences (e.g., magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence; MPRAGE), is error-prone due to the microgravity-related redistribution of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain. More modern neuroimaging methods, particularly dual-echo MPRAGE (DEMPRAGE) and magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence utilizing two inversion pulses (MP2RAGE), have been suggested to be resilient to this error. Here, we tested if these imaging modalities offered consistent segmentation performance improvements in some commonly employed neuroimaging software packages.METHODS: We conducted manual gray matter tissue segmentation in traditional T1w MRI images to utilize for comparison. Automated tissue segmentation was performed for traditional T1w imaging, as well as on DEMPRAGE and MP2RAGE images from the same subjects. Statistical analysis involved a comparison of total gray matter volumes for each modality, and the extent of tissue segmentation agreement was assessed using a test of similarity (Dice coefficient).RESULTS: Neither DEMPRAGE nor MP2RAGE exhibited consistent segmentation performance across all toolboxes tested.DISCUSSION: This research indicates that customized data collection and processing methods are necessary for reliable and valid structural MRI segmentation in astronauts, as current methods provide erroneous classification and hence inaccurate claims of neuroplastic brain changes in the astronaut population.Berger L, Burles F, Jaswal T, Williams R, Iaria G. Modern magnetic resonance imaging modalities to advance neuroimaging in astronauts. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(5):245-253.

推进宇航员神经成像的现代磁共振成像模式。
导言:航天工业的快速发展要求我们更深入地了解航天飞行对大脑的影响。核磁共振成像研究报告称,宇航员在太空飞行后脑容量发生变化,可能会影响认知能力。最近,我们已经证明,通过典型的 T1 加权序列(如磁化预处理快速梯度回波序列;MPRAGE)测量的这种体积变化证据,由于与微重力有关的脑脊液在大脑中的重新分布而容易产生误差。更现代的神经成像方法,特别是双回波 MPRAGE(DEMPRAGE)和利用两个反转脉冲的磁化预处理快速梯度回波序列(MP2RAGE),被认为可以抵御这种误差。在此,我们测试了这些成像模式是否能在一些常用的神经成像软件包中提供一致的分割性能改进。方法:我们在传统的 T1w MRI 图像中进行了手动灰质组织分割,以用于比较。对传统 T1w 成像以及同一受试者的 DEMPRAGE 和 MP2RAGE 图像进行了自动组织分割。统计分析包括比较每种模式的灰质总体积,并使用相似性测试(骰子系数)评估组织分割的一致程度。结果:在所有测试的工具箱中,DEMPRAGE 和 MP2RAGE 都没有表现出一致的分割性能。讨论:这项研究表明,要对宇航员进行可靠有效的结构磁共振成像分割,就必须采用定制的数据收集和处理方法,因为目前的方法会提供错误的分类,从而对宇航员群体的大脑神经可塑性变化做出不准确的判断。Aerosp Med Hum Perform.2024; 95(5):245-253.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信