Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Assessment in Japanese People.

Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3177/jnsv.70.106
Chihiro Toji, Yoko Saito, Naoko Hirota, Akiko Notsu, Mitsuru Fukui, Satoshi Sasaki, Chigusa Date
{"title":"Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Assessment in Japanese People.","authors":"Chihiro Toji, Yoko Saito, Naoko Hirota, Akiko Notsu, Mitsuru Fukui, Satoshi Sasaki, Chigusa Date","doi":"10.3177/jnsv.70.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 76-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was developed to investigate nutritional epidemiology in urban residents in Japan. The authors prepared two food models-a life-size three-dimensional model and a life-size two-dimensional photograph-to assess the FFQ portion size. The validity of the FFQ was verified using the two food models by comparing them with 16-d weighted dietary records (WDRs). Validation was conducted by comparing the FFQ1 findings with those obtained with the WDR, which is regarded as the gold standard, and reproducibility was verified by comparing the findings from FFQ2 and FFQ1. After completion of the WDR, the participants were randomized into two groups. In one group, the FFQ was conducted using life-size three-dimensional models (3D-FFQ) to estimate the portion size. In the other group, the FFQ was administered using life-size photo collection (2D-FFQ). Regarding validity, the median values (range) of Pearson's correlation coefficients for the energy and nutrient intake of the 32 items by the WDR and FFQ1 were r=0.53 (0.30-0.68) in the 3D-FFQ and r=0.57 (0.33-0.87) in the 2D-FFQ. When FFQs with 2D or 3D food models and two different portion sizes were compared with regard to the intake of certain food groups, energy, and nutrients, both the 2D-FFQ and 3D-FFQ provided good correlation coefficients with the WDR.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.70.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 76-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was developed to investigate nutritional epidemiology in urban residents in Japan. The authors prepared two food models-a life-size three-dimensional model and a life-size two-dimensional photograph-to assess the FFQ portion size. The validity of the FFQ was verified using the two food models by comparing them with 16-d weighted dietary records (WDRs). Validation was conducted by comparing the FFQ1 findings with those obtained with the WDR, which is regarded as the gold standard, and reproducibility was verified by comparing the findings from FFQ2 and FFQ1. After completion of the WDR, the participants were randomized into two groups. In one group, the FFQ was conducted using life-size three-dimensional models (3D-FFQ) to estimate the portion size. In the other group, the FFQ was administered using life-size photo collection (2D-FFQ). Regarding validity, the median values (range) of Pearson's correlation coefficients for the energy and nutrient intake of the 32 items by the WDR and FFQ1 were r=0.53 (0.30-0.68) in the 3D-FFQ and r=0.57 (0.33-0.87) in the 2D-FFQ. When FFQs with 2D or 3D food models and two different portion sizes were compared with regard to the intake of certain food groups, energy, and nutrients, both the 2D-FFQ and 3D-FFQ provided good correlation coefficients with the WDR.

分享
查看原文
用于日本人膳食评估的食物频率问卷的有效性和可重复性。
为了调查日本城市居民的营养流行病学,研究人员编制了一份包含 76 个项目的食物频率问卷(FFQ)。作者制作了两种食物模型--真人大小的三维模型和真人大小的二维照片--来评估 FFQ 的份量。通过将两种食物模型与 16 天加权膳食记录(WDR)进行比较,验证了 FFQ 的有效性。验证方法是将 FFQ1 的结果与 WDR(被视为黄金标准)的结果进行比较,而可重复性则通过比较 FFQ2 和 FFQ1 的结果来验证。完成 WDR 后,参与者被随机分为两组。一组使用真人大小的三维模型(3D-FFQ)进行 FFQ,以估算份量。另一组则使用真人大小的照片进行 FFQ(2D-FFQ)。在有效性方面,WDR 和 FFQ1 对 32 个项目的能量和营养素摄入量的皮尔逊相关系数的中值(范围)分别为:3D-FFQ 为 r=0.53 (0.30-0.68),2D-FFQ 为 r=0.57 (0.33-0.87)。当比较采用二维或三维食物模型和两种不同份量的 FFQ 与某些食物类别、能量和营养素的摄入量时,二维-FFQ 和三维-FFQ 与 WDR 都具有良好的相关系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信