Evaluation of Masticatory Function, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life Among Users of Complete Dentures Relined with Resilient Materials: A Systematic Review.

The International journal of prosthodontics Pub Date : 2024-04-22 Epub Date: 2022-12-06 DOI:10.11607/ijp.8130

Jeferson Batista Santiago, Rafaella de Souza Leão, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos, Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes

{"title":"Evaluation of Masticatory Function, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life Among Users of Complete Dentures Relined with Resilient Materials: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jeferson Batista Santiago, Rafaella de Souza Leão, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos, Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate whether complete dentures (CDs) relined with long-term resilient liners (LTRLs) favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to conventional CDs.Materials and methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and was registered in PROSPERO (the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42021258700). The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) purpose was to determine whether CDs relined with LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients when compared to CDs. Searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, BBO, and OpenGrey databases. Manual searches were also performed to identify additional primary studies.Results: Overall, 3,953 articles were found. After removing duplicates, reading the articles, and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were selected for qualitative analysis, totaling 422 patients with follow-up periods ranging from 1 week to 3 years. Among these, 8 studies assessed masticatory function using different methods, 2 assessed satisfaction, 1 assessed quality of life, and 4 assessed more than one outcome. Through qualitative analysis, LTRLs showed satisfactory results in most studies when compared to CDs in relation to masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life.Conclusions: LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to CDs.","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"37 2","pages":"210-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether complete dentures (CDs) relined with long-term resilient liners (LTRLs) favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to conventional CDs.

Materials and methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and was registered in PROSPERO (the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42021258700). The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) purpose was to determine whether CDs relined with LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients when compared to CDs. Searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, BBO, and OpenGrey databases. Manual searches were also performed to identify additional primary studies.

Results: Overall, 3,953 articles were found. After removing duplicates, reading the articles, and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were selected for qualitative analysis, totaling 422 patients with follow-up periods ranging from 1 week to 3 years. Among these, 8 studies assessed masticatory function using different methods, 2 assessed satisfaction, 1 assessed quality of life, and 4 assessed more than one outcome. Through qualitative analysis, LTRLs showed satisfactory results in most studies when compared to CDs in relation to masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life.

Conclusions: LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to CDs.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对使用弹性材料的全口义齿使用者的咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量进行评估：系统回顾

目的：评估与传统全口义齿（CD）相比，使用长期弹性衬垫（LTRL）重衬全口义齿（CD）是否有利于提高完全无牙颌患者的咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量：本综述遵循系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目（PRISMA）清单，并在 PROSPERO（系统综述国际前瞻性注册；CRD42021258700）上注册。该研究的研究对象、干预、比较和结果（PICO）旨在确定与 CDs 相比，用 LTRLs 对 CDs 进行再衬垫是否能改善完全无牙颌患者的咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量。在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Lilacs、BBO 和 OpenGrey 数据库中进行了检索。此外，还进行了人工检索以确定其他主要研究：结果：总共找到 3953 篇文章。在删除重复文章、阅读文章并应用纳入和排除标准后，选择了 15 篇文章进行定性分析，共计 422 名患者，随访时间从 1 周到 3 年不等。其中，8 项研究使用不同的方法评估了咀嚼功能，2 项研究评估了满意度，1 项研究评估了生活质量，4 项研究评估了一种以上的结果。通过定性分析，在咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量方面，LTRL 与 CD 相比，大多数研究都显示出令人满意的结果：结论：与CD相比，LTRL有利于提高完全无牙颌患者的咀嚼功能、满意度和生活质量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

The International journal of prosthodontics

自引率

0.00%

发文量