A Wardhana, C L Sukasah, A N Syarif, S F Tanjunga, G A Winarno, R P Apriza, L Aurora
{"title":"Flir One<sup>®</sup> As A Predicting Factor for Burn Wound Conversion: A Preliminary Report.","authors":"A Wardhana, C L Sukasah, A N Syarif, S F Tanjunga, G A Winarno, R P Apriza, L Aurora","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn area may progress into a more profound wound, known as burn wound conversion. Early prediction of burn wound conversion guides clinicians in their treatment decision. This study aimed to assess the reliability of FLIR One<sup>®</sup> in predicting burn wound conversion. We conducted a prospective cohort study, including patients who were admitted to our tertiary hospital from December 2018 to December 2019. All adult patients with mid-dermal burn injury of less than 40% TBSA that occurred within 72 hours were included in our study. Thermal imaging FLIR One<sup>®</sup> was used to evaluate the difference between burn wound and healthy skin in the same area (DT1), and ImageJ software objectively measured the burn's extension. The examinations were done by a plastic surgeon on the 1<sup>st</sup> and the 3<sup>rd</sup> day of admission. Data were later compared and statistically analyzed. A total of 157 wound samples were collected from 40 patients - a slightly higher number were found in males (57.5%). The major cause of burn was gas explosion (50%), mostly with less than 20% TBSA (55%). The area under the curve (AUC) for DT1 was 0.884 (95% CI: 0.822 - 0.945) p<0.05 with a cut-off point at DT1 more than 1.25°C lower than unburned skin. However, there was no correlation between DT1 and extension of the wound area. Thermal difference (DT1), measured using thermal imaging FLIR One<sup>®</sup> could be considered as a predictor of burn wound conversion from mid-dermal to deep dermal, with the optimal cut-off point of 1.25°C lower than unburned skin.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"36 2","pages":"165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Burn area may progress into a more profound wound, known as burn wound conversion. Early prediction of burn wound conversion guides clinicians in their treatment decision. This study aimed to assess the reliability of FLIR One® in predicting burn wound conversion. We conducted a prospective cohort study, including patients who were admitted to our tertiary hospital from December 2018 to December 2019. All adult patients with mid-dermal burn injury of less than 40% TBSA that occurred within 72 hours were included in our study. Thermal imaging FLIR One® was used to evaluate the difference between burn wound and healthy skin in the same area (DT1), and ImageJ software objectively measured the burn's extension. The examinations were done by a plastic surgeon on the 1st and the 3rd day of admission. Data were later compared and statistically analyzed. A total of 157 wound samples were collected from 40 patients - a slightly higher number were found in males (57.5%). The major cause of burn was gas explosion (50%), mostly with less than 20% TBSA (55%). The area under the curve (AUC) for DT1 was 0.884 (95% CI: 0.822 - 0.945) p<0.05 with a cut-off point at DT1 more than 1.25°C lower than unburned skin. However, there was no correlation between DT1 and extension of the wound area. Thermal difference (DT1), measured using thermal imaging FLIR One® could be considered as a predictor of burn wound conversion from mid-dermal to deep dermal, with the optimal cut-off point of 1.25°C lower than unburned skin.