The prognostic value of lung ultrasound score (LUSS) in patients with COVID-19 admitted in Emergency Department: a prospective observational study.

Igiene e sanita pubblica Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Alessia Galli, Elisa Andreoli, Valentina Di Paola, Giulia Pierdomenico, Samantha Sisani, Silvia Del Prete, Luca Giuliani, Fabienne Yvonne Pallua, Susanna Contucci, Matteo Marcosignori, Vincenzo Giannicola Menditto
{"title":"The prognostic value of lung ultrasound score (LUSS) in patients with COVID-19 admitted in Emergency Department: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Alessia Galli, Elisa Andreoli, Valentina Di Paola, Giulia Pierdomenico, Samantha Sisani, Silvia Del Prete, Luca Giuliani, Fabienne Yvonne Pallua, Susanna Contucci, Matteo Marcosignori, Vincenzo Giannicola Menditto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Lung Ultrasound (LUS) is routinely used as a point-of-care imaging tool in Emergency Department (ED) and its role in COVID-19 is being studied. The Lung UltraSound Score (LUSS) is a semi quantitative score of lung damage severity. Alongside instrumental diagnostic, the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, obtained from arterial blood gas analysis, is the index used to assess the severity of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), according to the Berlin definition.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of the study was to evaluate a possible correlation between the LUSS score and the P/F Ratio, obtained from the arterial sampling in COVID-19 positive patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a cross-perspective monocentric observational study and it was carried out in the Emergency Department of the \"AOU delle Marche\" (Ancona, Italy), from 1 January 2023 to 28 February 2023. The study foresaw, once the patient was admitted to the ED, the execution of the LUS exam and the subsequent calculation of the LUSS score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample selected for the study was of 158 patients. The proportion of LUSS ≤4 was statistically higher in those with a P/F >300 (76.2%), compared to those with a P/F ≤300 (13.2%). On the other end, the proportion of LUSS >4 was lower in those who have P/F >300 (23.8%), while it was higher in those who have P/F ≤300 (86.8%). Those patients with a LUSS >4 were 1.76 (95% CI: 1.57 - 1.99) times more likely to have a P/F ≤300, compared to those with LUSS ≤4. The Odds Ratio of having a P/F ≤300 value in those achieving a LUSS >4, compared to those achieving a LUSS ≤4, was 21.0 (95% CI: 8.4 - 52.4). The study identified pO2, Hb and dichotomous LUSS as predictors of the level of P/F ≤300 or P/F >300.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found that the LUSS score defined by our study was closely related to the P/F ratio COVID-19 positive patients. Our study presented provides evidence on the potential rule of the LUSS for detecting the stage of lung impairment and the need for oxygen therapy in COVID-19 positive patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73329,"journal":{"name":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","volume":"80 1","pages":"19-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Lung Ultrasound (LUS) is routinely used as a point-of-care imaging tool in Emergency Department (ED) and its role in COVID-19 is being studied. The Lung UltraSound Score (LUSS) is a semi quantitative score of lung damage severity. Alongside instrumental diagnostic, the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, obtained from arterial blood gas analysis, is the index used to assess the severity of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), according to the Berlin definition.

Objectives: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate a possible correlation between the LUSS score and the P/F Ratio, obtained from the arterial sampling in COVID-19 positive patients.

Materials and methods: This was a cross-perspective monocentric observational study and it was carried out in the Emergency Department of the "AOU delle Marche" (Ancona, Italy), from 1 January 2023 to 28 February 2023. The study foresaw, once the patient was admitted to the ED, the execution of the LUS exam and the subsequent calculation of the LUSS score.

Results: The sample selected for the study was of 158 patients. The proportion of LUSS ≤4 was statistically higher in those with a P/F >300 (76.2%), compared to those with a P/F ≤300 (13.2%). On the other end, the proportion of LUSS >4 was lower in those who have P/F >300 (23.8%), while it was higher in those who have P/F ≤300 (86.8%). Those patients with a LUSS >4 were 1.76 (95% CI: 1.57 - 1.99) times more likely to have a P/F ≤300, compared to those with LUSS ≤4. The Odds Ratio of having a P/F ≤300 value in those achieving a LUSS >4, compared to those achieving a LUSS ≤4, was 21.0 (95% CI: 8.4 - 52.4). The study identified pO2, Hb and dichotomous LUSS as predictors of the level of P/F ≤300 or P/F >300.

Discussion: We found that the LUSS score defined by our study was closely related to the P/F ratio COVID-19 positive patients. Our study presented provides evidence on the potential rule of the LUSS for detecting the stage of lung impairment and the need for oxygen therapy in COVID-19 positive patients.

急诊科收治的 COVID-19 患者肺部超声评分(LUSS)的预后价值:一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:肺部超声波(LUS)是急诊科(ED)常规使用的护理点成像工具,目前正在研究它在 COVID-19 中的作用。肺超音波评分(LUSS)是肺损伤严重程度的半定量评分。除仪器诊断外,根据柏林定义,动脉血气分析得出的 PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) 比值也是用于评估急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)严重程度的指标:研究的主要目的是评估 COVID-19 阳性患者动脉采样获得的 LUSS 评分与 P/F 比值之间可能存在的相关性:这是一项交叉前瞻性单中心观察研究,于 2023 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 2 月 28 日在 "AOU delle Marche"(意大利安科纳)急诊科进行。研究预计,一旦患者进入急诊室,就会进行 LUS 检查,随后计算 LUSS 分数:研究选取了 158 名患者作为样本。据统计,P/F>300(76.2%)与P/F≤300(13.2%)相比,LUSS≤4的比例更高。另一方面,P/F>300的患者中LUSS>4的比例较低(23.8%),而P/F≤300的患者中LUSS>4的比例较高(86.8%)。与 LUSS ≤4 的患者相比,LUSS >4 的患者 P/F ≤300 的几率要高 1.76 倍(95% CI:1.57 - 1.99)。与 LUSS ≤4 的患者相比,LUSS >4 的患者 P/F ≤300 值的比值比为 21.0(95% CI:8.4 - 52.4)。该研究确定 pO2、Hb 和二分 LUSS 是预测 P/F ≤300 或 P/F >300 水平的因素:讨论:我们发现,本研究定义的 LUSS 评分与 COVID-19 阳性患者的 P/F 比率密切相关。我们的研究为 LUSS 检测 COVID-19 阳性患者的肺功能损害阶段和氧疗需求提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信