Risque d'acidose en cas de déclenchement pour PAG avant 37 SA

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
{"title":"Risque d'acidose en cas de déclenchement pour PAG avant 37 SA","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2024.03.086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>If a small for gestational age (SGA) foetus needs to be delivered because of severity (&lt;<!--> <!-->3rd centile) attempting induction of labor theoretically increases the risk of caesarean section and neonatal acidosis, but these risks are poorly understood. This article aims to assess the risk of caesarean section and neonatal acidosis in attempted vaginal birth of a moderately preterm foetus in the setting of severe SGA.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A single-centre hospital-based observational study conducted over a period of 17 consecutive years in mothers with a single foetus in cephalic presentation with severe SGA (&lt;<!--> <!-->3rd centile) needing foetal extraction. Neonatal acidosis was considered moderate if pH<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->7.10 and severe if pH<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->7.0. The degree of severity of SGA was estimated according to the birth weight ratio.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four hundred and thirty-four foetuses with severe SGA were included during the period, 140 of whom were born after induction (32.3%). In this group, 66.4% of women achieved a vaginal birth (66.4%; 95% CI [58.0-74.2]) and the risk of moderate or severe acidosis was doubled compared with the group of foetuses who had undergone a planned caesarean section (7.9% vs. 3.1%, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.7 [1.1-6.7]). Neither gestational age nor the degree of growth restriction was significantly related to the risk of caesarean section or to the risk of moderate or severe neonatal acidosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In cases of severe SGA before 37<!--> <!-->weeks' gestation, induction of labour allows vaginal delivery in two-thirds of cases. It is accompanied by a doubling of the risk of moderate or severe neonatal acidosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":"52 11","pages":"Pages 615-619"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468718924001909","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

If a small for gestational age (SGA) foetus needs to be delivered because of severity (< 3rd centile) attempting induction of labor theoretically increases the risk of caesarean section and neonatal acidosis, but these risks are poorly understood. This article aims to assess the risk of caesarean section and neonatal acidosis in attempted vaginal birth of a moderately preterm foetus in the setting of severe SGA.

Method

A single-centre hospital-based observational study conducted over a period of 17 consecutive years in mothers with a single foetus in cephalic presentation with severe SGA (< 3rd centile) needing foetal extraction. Neonatal acidosis was considered moderate if pH < 7.10 and severe if pH < 7.0. The degree of severity of SGA was estimated according to the birth weight ratio.

Results

Four hundred and thirty-four foetuses with severe SGA were included during the period, 140 of whom were born after induction (32.3%). In this group, 66.4% of women achieved a vaginal birth (66.4%; 95% CI [58.0-74.2]) and the risk of moderate or severe acidosis was doubled compared with the group of foetuses who had undergone a planned caesarean section (7.9% vs. 3.1%, OR = 2.7 [1.1-6.7]). Neither gestational age nor the degree of growth restriction was significantly related to the risk of caesarean section or to the risk of moderate or severe neonatal acidosis.

Conclusion

In cases of severe SGA before 37 weeks' gestation, induction of labour allows vaginal delivery in two-thirds of cases. It is accompanied by a doubling of the risk of moderate or severe neonatal acidosis.
[严重早产 SGA 胎儿经阴道分娩并引产的机会:一项观察性研究]。
目标:如果胎龄过小(SGA)的胎儿因严重的 SGA 而需要分娩(方法:对单胎头位、重度 SGA 的母亲进行连续 17 年的单中心医院观察研究:连续 17 年对单胎头位分娩且严重 SGA 的母亲进行单中心医院观察研究(结果:在此期间,共纳入 434 名严重 SGA 胎儿:研究期间共纳入了 434 名重度 SGA 胎儿,其中 140 名是引产后出生的(32.3%)。在这一组中,66.4%的产妇通过阴道分娩(66.4%;95% CI [58.0-74.2]),与计划剖腹产的胎儿相比,中度或重度酸中毒的风险增加了一倍(7.9% 对 3.1%,OR=2.7 [1.1-6.7])。胎龄和生长受限程度与剖腹产风险或中度或重度新生儿酸中毒风险均无明显关系:结论:对于妊娠 37 周前的重度 SGA 病例,三分之二的病例可以通过引产进行阴道分娩。结论:对于妊娠 37 周前的重度 SGA 病例,三分之二的病例可以通过引产进行阴道分娩,但同时发生中度或重度新生儿酸中毒的风险会增加一倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie est un mensuel scientifique d''information et de formation destiné aux gynécologues, aux obstétriciens, aux sénologues et aux biologistes de la reproduction. La revue, dans ses éditoriaux, articles originaux, mises au point, lettres à la rédaction et autres rubriques, donne une information actualisée ayant trait à l''obstétrique et à la gynécologie et aux différentes spécialités développées à partir de ces deux pôles : médecine de la reproduction, médecine maternelle et fœtale, périnatalité, endocrinologie, chirurgie gynécologique, cancérologie pelvienne, sénologie, sexualité, psychosomatique…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信