Breathing mode assessment with thermography: a pilot study.

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
CoDAS Pub Date : 2024-04-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20232022323pt
Yasmim Carvalho Telson, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Furlan, Rafael Augusto Magalhães Ferreira, Matheus Pereira Porto, Andréa Rodrigues Motta
{"title":"Breathing mode assessment with thermography: a pilot study.","authors":"Yasmim Carvalho Telson, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Furlan, Rafael Augusto Magalhães Ferreira, Matheus Pereira Porto, Andréa Rodrigues Motta","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232022323pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To present a method for analyzing breathing modes with infrared thermography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory cross-sectional study used 38 thermal images of inspiration and expiration with nasal breathing and simulated mouth breathing in four nasal breathers without respiratory complaints. Three different data selection forms (line, rectangle, and ellipse) were used to extract the minimum, mean, and maximum temperatures of the regions of interest (nose and mouth) using the FLIR Tools® software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the three selection forms, there was greater temperature variability obtained with the line, revealing limitations in this measurement. There were no differences between the rectangle and ellipse values, showing that both selection forms present similar temperature extraction results. The comparison results between nose and mouth temperatures during inspiration and expiration indicated a statistically significant difference between all measurements, except for mean inspiration temperatures with the rectangle and ellipse. The breathing mode can be distinguished in both inspiration and expiration when using mean mouth temperatures with the rectangle and ellipse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breathing modes should be assessed based on mean mouth temperatures during inspiration, using the ellipse.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022323pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To present a method for analyzing breathing modes with infrared thermography.

Methods: This exploratory cross-sectional study used 38 thermal images of inspiration and expiration with nasal breathing and simulated mouth breathing in four nasal breathers without respiratory complaints. Three different data selection forms (line, rectangle, and ellipse) were used to extract the minimum, mean, and maximum temperatures of the regions of interest (nose and mouth) using the FLIR Tools® software.

Results: Among the three selection forms, there was greater temperature variability obtained with the line, revealing limitations in this measurement. There were no differences between the rectangle and ellipse values, showing that both selection forms present similar temperature extraction results. The comparison results between nose and mouth temperatures during inspiration and expiration indicated a statistically significant difference between all measurements, except for mean inspiration temperatures with the rectangle and ellipse. The breathing mode can be distinguished in both inspiration and expiration when using mean mouth temperatures with the rectangle and ellipse.

Conclusion: Breathing modes should be assessed based on mean mouth temperatures during inspiration, using the ellipse.

利用热成像技术评估呼吸模式:一项试点研究。
目的:介绍一种利用红外热成像分析呼吸模式的方法:这项探索性横断面研究使用了四名无呼吸系统疾病的鼻呼吸者的 38 幅吸气和呼气时的热图像,以及模拟口呼吸时的热图像。采用三种不同的数据选择形式(直线、矩形和椭圆),利用 FLIR Tools® 软件提取相关区域(鼻腔和口腔)的最低、平均和最高温度:结果:在三种选择形式中,直线获得的温度变化更大,显示出这种测量方法的局限性。矩形和椭圆的数值没有差异,表明两种选择形式的温度提取结果相似。吸气和呼气时口鼻温度的比较结果表明,除矩形和椭圆形的平均吸气温度外,所有测量值之间都存在显著的统计学差异。使用矩形和椭圆形的平均口腔温度可以区分吸气和呼气时的呼吸模式:结论:应使用椭圆形测量吸气时的平均口腔温度来评估呼吸模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信