Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.2196/53113
Xengie Doan, Arianna Rossi, Marietjie Botes, Annika Selzer
{"title":"Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative Study.","authors":"Xengie Doan, Arianna Rossi, Marietjie Botes, Annika Selzer","doi":"10.2196/53113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As consent for data sharing evolves with the digital age, plain-text consent is not the only format in which information can be presented. However, designing a good consent form is highly challenging. The addition of graphics, video, and other mediums to use can vary widely in effectiveness; and improper use can be detrimental to users.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the expectations and experiences of adults toward consent given in infographic, video, text, newsletter, and comic forms in a health data sharing scenario to better understand the appropriateness of different mediums and identify elements of each medium that most affect engagement with the content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed mock consent forms in infographic, video, text, newsletter, and comic versions. Semistructured interviews were conducted with adults who were interviewed about their expectations for consent and were then shown each consent medium and asked about engaging elements across mediums, preferences for consent mediums, and the value of document quality criteria. We transcribed and qualitatively co-coded to identify themes and perform analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 24 users and identified different thematic archetypes based on participant goals, such as the Trust Seeker, who considered their own understanding and trust in organizations when making decisions. The infographic was ranked first for enhancing understanding, prioritizing information, and maintaining the proper audience fit for serious consent in health data sharing scenarios. In addition, specific elements such as structure, step-by-step organization, and readability were preferred engaging elements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified archetypes to better understand user needs and elements that can be targeted to enhance user engagement with consent forms; this can help inform the design of more effective consent in the future. Overall, preferences for mediums are highly contextual, and more research should be done.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11094594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As consent for data sharing evolves with the digital age, plain-text consent is not the only format in which information can be presented. However, designing a good consent form is highly challenging. The addition of graphics, video, and other mediums to use can vary widely in effectiveness; and improper use can be detrimental to users.

Objective: This study aims to explore the expectations and experiences of adults toward consent given in infographic, video, text, newsletter, and comic forms in a health data sharing scenario to better understand the appropriateness of different mediums and identify elements of each medium that most affect engagement with the content.

Methods: We designed mock consent forms in infographic, video, text, newsletter, and comic versions. Semistructured interviews were conducted with adults who were interviewed about their expectations for consent and were then shown each consent medium and asked about engaging elements across mediums, preferences for consent mediums, and the value of document quality criteria. We transcribed and qualitatively co-coded to identify themes and perform analyses.

Results: We interviewed 24 users and identified different thematic archetypes based on participant goals, such as the Trust Seeker, who considered their own understanding and trust in organizations when making decisions. The infographic was ranked first for enhancing understanding, prioritizing information, and maintaining the proper audience fit for serious consent in health data sharing scenarios. In addition, specific elements such as structure, step-by-step organization, and readability were preferred engaging elements.

Conclusions: We identified archetypes to better understand user needs and elements that can be targeted to enhance user engagement with consent forms; this can help inform the design of more effective consent in the future. Overall, preferences for mediums are highly contextual, and more research should be done.

比较对不同同意媒介的态度:半结构式定性研究。
背景:随着数据共享同意书在数字时代的发展,纯文本同意书已不再是唯一的信息表述格式。然而,设计一份好的同意书极具挑战性。添加图形、视频和其他媒介的效果可能会有很大差异;使用不当可能会对用户造成损害:本研究旨在探讨在健康数据共享场景中,成人对信息图表、视频、文本、通讯和漫画形式的同意书的期望和体验,以更好地了解不同媒介的适当性,并确定每种媒介中最能影响内容参与度的元素:我们设计了信息图表、视频、文本、通讯和漫画版本的模拟同意书。我们对成年人进行了半结构式访谈,向他们了解了他们对同意书的期望,然后向他们展示了每种同意书媒介,并询问了各种媒介的吸引人要素、对同意书媒介的偏好以及文件质量标准的价值。我们进行了转录和定性共同编码,以确定主题并进行分析:我们对 24 位用户进行了访谈,并根据参与者的目标确定了不同的主题原型,例如 "信任寻求者",他们在做决定时会考虑自己对组织的理解和信任。信息图表在增强理解、确定信息优先级以及保持适当的受众群以获得健康数据共享场景中的严肃同意方面被评为第一名。此外,结构、分步组织和可读性等特定元素也是吸引人的首选元素:我们发现了一些原型,从而更好地了解了用户需求以及可用于提高用户参与同意书的元素;这有助于为今后设计更有效的同意书提供信息。总体而言,用户对媒介的偏好与具体情况密切相关,因此还需要开展更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信