A novel model of artificial intelligence based automated image analysis of CT urography to identify bladder cancer in patients investigated for macroscopic hematuria.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Suleiman Abuhasanein, Lars Edenbrandt, Olof Enqvist, Staffan Jahnson, Henrik Leonhardt, Elin Trägårdh, Johannes Ulén, Henrik Kjölhede
{"title":"A novel model of artificial intelligence based automated image analysis of CT urography to identify bladder cancer in patients investigated for macroscopic hematuria.","authors":"Suleiman Abuhasanein, Lars Edenbrandt, Olof Enqvist, Staffan Jahnson, Henrik Leonhardt, Elin Trägårdh, Johannes Ulén, Henrik Kjölhede","doi":"10.2340/sju.v59.39930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) based automatic image analysis utilising convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be used to evaluate computed tomography urography (CTU) for the presence of urinary bladder cancer (UBC) in patients with macroscopic hematuria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study included patients who had undergone evaluation for macroscopic hematuria. A CNN-based AI model was trained and validated on the CTUs included in the study on a dedicated research platform (Recomia.org). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to assess the performance of the AI model. Cystoscopy findings were used as the reference method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The training cohort comprised a total of 530 patients. Following the optimisation process, we developed the last version of our AI model. Subsequently, we utilised the model in the validation cohort which included an additional 400 patients (including 239 patients with UBC). The AI model had a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.76-0.89), specificity of 0.76 (95% CI 0.67-0.84), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98). The majority of tumours in the false negative group (n = 24) were solitary (67%) and smaller than 1 cm (50%), with the majority of patients having cTaG1-2 (71%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and tested an AI model for automatic image analysis of CTUs to detect UBC in patients with macroscopic hematuria. This model showed promising results with a high detection rate and excessive NPV. Further developments could lead to a decreased need for invasive investigations and prioritising patients with serious tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":"59 ","pages":"90-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v59.39930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) based automatic image analysis utilising convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be used to evaluate computed tomography urography (CTU) for the presence of urinary bladder cancer (UBC) in patients with macroscopic hematuria.

Methods: Our study included patients who had undergone evaluation for macroscopic hematuria. A CNN-based AI model was trained and validated on the CTUs included in the study on a dedicated research platform (Recomia.org). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to assess the performance of the AI model. Cystoscopy findings were used as the reference method.

Results: The training cohort comprised a total of 530 patients. Following the optimisation process, we developed the last version of our AI model. Subsequently, we utilised the model in the validation cohort which included an additional 400 patients (including 239 patients with UBC). The AI model had a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.76-0.89), specificity of 0.76 (95% CI 0.67-0.84), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98). The majority of tumours in the false negative group (n = 24) were solitary (67%) and smaller than 1 cm (50%), with the majority of patients having cTaG1-2 (71%).

Conclusions: We developed and tested an AI model for automatic image analysis of CTUs to detect UBC in patients with macroscopic hematuria. This model showed promising results with a high detection rate and excessive NPV. Further developments could lead to a decreased need for invasive investigations and prioritising patients with serious tumours.

基于人工智能的 CT 尿路造影术自动图像分析新模型,用于识别大镜下血尿患者的膀胱癌。
目的评估利用卷积神经网络(CNN)进行的基于人工智能(AI)的自动图像分析是否可用于评估计算机断层扫描尿路造影术(CTU),以确定大镜下血尿患者是否患有膀胱癌(UBC):方法:我们的研究纳入了接受大镜下血尿评估的患者。在专用研究平台(Recomia.org)上对研究中的 CTU 训练并验证了基于 CNN 的人工智能模型。计算灵敏度和特异性以评估人工智能模型的性能。膀胱镜检查结果作为参考方法:训练组共有 530 名患者。经过优化后,我们开发出了人工智能模型的最后一个版本。随后,我们在验证队列中使用了该模型,其中包括另外 400 名患者(包括 239 名 UBC 患者)。人工智能模型的灵敏度为 0.83(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.76-0.89),特异性为 0.76(95% CI 0.67-0.84),阴性预测值 (NPV) 为 0.97(95% CI 0.95-0.98)。假阴性组中的大多数肿瘤(n = 24)是单发的(67%),小于 1 厘米(50%),大多数患者的 cTaG1-2 肿瘤(71%):我们开发并测试了一种自动图像分析 CTU 的人工智能模型,用于检测大镜下血尿患者的 UBC。该模型显示出良好的效果,具有较高的检出率和较高的 NPV。进一步开发可减少对侵入性检查的需求,并优先考虑严重肿瘤患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信