Effectiveness of a Teach-Back Education Program on Perioperative Pain in Patients With Lung Cancer: An Intervention Study Using Behavior Change Wheel

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Teach-Back Education Program on Perioperative Pain in Patients With Lung Cancer: An Intervention Study Using Behavior Change Wheel","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the effect of a teach-back educational intervention using Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) framework on perioperative pain among patients with lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective quasi-experimental study was conducted in 88 patients with lung cancer from a tertiary hospital in China. According to the order of admission, they were allocated to either control group or intervention group, with 44 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received routine nursing care, while patients in the intervention group were given a teach-back education program based on BCW framework. The visual analog scale (VAS) was adopted to evaluate patients’ pain on the day of surgery (T0), 1 (T1), 2 (T2), and 3 (T3) days after surgery. We also recorded the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), the length of hospital stay, and the degree of patients’ satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Rest pain, pain when coughing, and pain during activity that patients in the intervention group experienced were significantly less severe than those in the control group on T0 and T1. The pain when coughing in the intervention group was also significantly milder on T2 and T3. In addition, the number of self-control time, use duration, and total dose of PCA were significantly lower in the intervention group. Moreover, patients’ satisfaction of nursing service was significantly higher in the intervention group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A teach-back education program based on BCW framework was effective in pain management among the perioperative patients with lung cancer. This study demonstrates the application of teach-back method and the BCW in the development of patient education intervention to mitigate perioperative pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 402-408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001097/pdfft?md5=addfb22cc56c3db59061948e5b8f4c63&pid=1-s2.0-S1524904224001097-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the effect of a teach-back educational intervention using Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) framework on perioperative pain among patients with lung cancer.

Methods

A prospective quasi-experimental study was conducted in 88 patients with lung cancer from a tertiary hospital in China. According to the order of admission, they were allocated to either control group or intervention group, with 44 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received routine nursing care, while patients in the intervention group were given a teach-back education program based on BCW framework. The visual analog scale (VAS) was adopted to evaluate patients’ pain on the day of surgery (T0), 1 (T1), 2 (T2), and 3 (T3) days after surgery. We also recorded the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), the length of hospital stay, and the degree of patients’ satisfaction.

Results

Rest pain, pain when coughing, and pain during activity that patients in the intervention group experienced were significantly less severe than those in the control group on T0 and T1. The pain when coughing in the intervention group was also significantly milder on T2 and T3. In addition, the number of self-control time, use duration, and total dose of PCA were significantly lower in the intervention group. Moreover, patients’ satisfaction of nursing service was significantly higher in the intervention group.

Conclusion

A teach-back education program based on BCW framework was effective in pain management among the perioperative patients with lung cancer. This study demonstrates the application of teach-back method and the BCW in the development of patient education intervention to mitigate perioperative pain.

针对肺癌患者围手术期疼痛的回授教育计划的效果:使用行为改变轮的干预研究》。
目的采用行为改变轮(BCW)框架评估回授式教育干预对肺癌患者围手术期疼痛的影响:方法:对中国某三级医院的 88 名肺癌患者进行了一项前瞻性准实验研究。根据入院顺序,患者被分配到对照组或干预组,每组 44 人。对照组患者接受常规护理,而干预组患者则接受基于 BCW 框架的回馈式教育项目。我们采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)来评估患者在手术当天(T0)、术后1天(T1)、2天(T2)和3天(T3)的疼痛情况。我们还记录了患者自控镇痛(PCA)的使用情况、住院时间以及患者的满意度:结果:在 T0 和 T1,干预组患者的休息痛、咳嗽痛和活动痛明显少于对照组。干预组患者咳嗽时的疼痛在 T2 和 T3 也明显减轻。此外,干预组患者自我控制时间、使用时间和 PCA 总剂量均明显低于对照组。此外,干预组患者对护理服务的满意度也明显提高:结论:基于BCW框架的回授式教育计划对肺癌围手术期患者的疼痛管理有效。本研究证明了回授法和BCW在减轻围手术期疼痛的患者教育干预中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信