Feasibility of Computerized Visuomotor Integration System for Visual Field Defects and Spatial Neglect in Poststroke Patients.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-25 DOI:10.5535/arm.230028
Hyeon-Taek Hong, Myeong Geun Jeong, Kyoung Tae Kim
{"title":"Feasibility of Computerized Visuomotor Integration System for Visual Field Defects and Spatial Neglect in Poststroke Patients.","authors":"Hyeon-Taek Hong, Myeong Geun Jeong, Kyoung Tae Kim","doi":"10.5535/arm.230028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a computerized visuomotor integration system for assessment and training of visual perception impairments and evaluate its safety and feasibility in patients with a stroke. Visual field defects and spatial neglect lead to substantial poststroke impairment. Most diagnostic assessments are anchored in traditional methods, and clinical effects of rehabilitation treatments are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CoTras Vision system included two evaluations and four training modules. The evaluation modules were based on the Albert's test and Star cancellation test, and training modules were based on visual tracking, central-peripheral integration, and visuomotor perception techniques. Bland-Altman plots for agreement with the traditional paper-and-pencil test were performed, and the modified Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, and Simulator Sickness Questionnaire were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients with acute stroke completed the study. Bland-Altman plots revealed good agreements for Albert's test (mean difference, -0.3±4.5) and Star cancellation test (mean difference, 0.3±0.7). The mean±standard deviation scores of the modified Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, Patient Satisfaction Survey, and Simulator Sickness Questionnaire were 84.7±30.6, 40.5±7.9, and 34.0±34.5 respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CoTras Vision system is feasible and safe in patients with stroke. Most patients had a high degree of motivation to use the system and did not experience severe adverse events. Further studies are needed to confirm its usefulness in stroke patients with visual field defects and hemineglect symptoms. Furthermore, a large, well-designed, randomized controlled trial will be needed to confirm the treatment effect of the CoTras Vision system.</p>","PeriodicalId":47738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","volume":"48 2","pages":"146-154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.230028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a computerized visuomotor integration system for assessment and training of visual perception impairments and evaluate its safety and feasibility in patients with a stroke. Visual field defects and spatial neglect lead to substantial poststroke impairment. Most diagnostic assessments are anchored in traditional methods, and clinical effects of rehabilitation treatments are limited.

Methods: The CoTras Vision system included two evaluations and four training modules. The evaluation modules were based on the Albert's test and Star cancellation test, and training modules were based on visual tracking, central-peripheral integration, and visuomotor perception techniques. Bland-Altman plots for agreement with the traditional paper-and-pencil test were performed, and the modified Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, and Simulator Sickness Questionnaire were conducted.

Results: Ten patients with acute stroke completed the study. Bland-Altman plots revealed good agreements for Albert's test (mean difference, -0.3±4.5) and Star cancellation test (mean difference, 0.3±0.7). The mean±standard deviation scores of the modified Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, Patient Satisfaction Survey, and Simulator Sickness Questionnaire were 84.7±30.6, 40.5±7.9, and 34.0±34.5 respectively.

Conclusion: The CoTras Vision system is feasible and safe in patients with stroke. Most patients had a high degree of motivation to use the system and did not experience severe adverse events. Further studies are needed to confirm its usefulness in stroke patients with visual field defects and hemineglect symptoms. Furthermore, a large, well-designed, randomized controlled trial will be needed to confirm the treatment effect of the CoTras Vision system.

电脑视觉运动整合系统治疗中风后患者视野缺陷和空间疏忽的可行性。
目的开发一种用于评估和训练视知觉障碍的计算机化视觉运动整合系统,并评估其在中风患者中的安全性和可行性。视野缺陷和空间忽略会导致脑卒中后的严重损伤。大多数诊断评估都基于传统方法,康复治疗的临床效果有限:CoTras 视觉系统包括两个评估模块和四个训练模块。方法:CoTras 视觉系统包括两个评估模块和四个训练模块,评估模块基于阿尔伯特测试和星形消除测试,训练模块基于视觉跟踪、中枢-外周整合和视觉运动感知技术。对与传统纸笔测试的一致性进行了Bland-Altman绘图,并进行了改良的内在动机量表、患者满意度问卷和模拟器疾病问卷调查:结果:10 名急性中风患者完成了研究。研究结果:10 名急性脑卒中患者完成了研究,研究结果显示,艾伯特试验(平均差异为-0.3±4.5)和星形取消试验(平均差异为 0.3±0.7)的Bland-Altman 图显示了良好的一致性。改良的内在动机量表、患者满意度调查和模拟器疾病问卷的平均分(标准偏差)分别为 84.7±30.6、40.5±7.9 和 34.0±34.5:CoTras Vision 系统对脑卒中患者是可行且安全的。结论:CoTras Vision 系统对脑卒中患者是可行和安全的,大多数患者使用该系统的积极性很高,而且没有出现严重的不良反应。还需要进一步研究,以确认该系统在有视野缺损和偏瘫症状的中风患者中的实用性。此外,还需要进行大规模、精心设计的随机对照试验,以确认 CoTras Vision 系统的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信