Grading of Gliomas by Contrast-Enhanced CT Radiomics Features.

Q3 Medicine
Mohammad Maskani, Samaneh Abbasi, Hamidreza Etemad-Rezaee, Hamid Abdolahi, Amir Zamanpour, Alireza Montazerabadi
{"title":"Grading of Gliomas by Contrast-Enhanced CT Radiomics Features.","authors":"Mohammad Maskani, Samaneh Abbasi, Hamidreza Etemad-Rezaee, Hamid Abdolahi, Amir Zamanpour, Alireza Montazerabadi","doi":"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2306-1628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gliomas, as Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors, are greatly common with 80% of malignancy. Treatment methods for gliomas, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy depend on the grade, size, location, and the patient's age.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to quantify glioma based on the radiomics analysis and classify its grade into High-grade Glioma (HGG) or Low-grade Glioma (LGG) by various machine-learning methods using contrast-enhanced brain Computerized Tomography (CT) scans.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved acquiring and segmenting data, selecting and extracting features, classifying, analyzing, and evaluating classifiers. The study included a total of 62 patients (31 with LGG and 31 with HGG). The tumors were segmented by an experienced CT-scan technologist with 3D slicer software. A total of 14 shape features, 18 histogram-based features, and 75 texture-based features were computed. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) were used to evaluate and compare classification models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 out of 107 features were selected to differentiate between LGGs and HGGs and to perform various classifier algorithms with different cross-validations. The best classifier algorithm was linear-discriminant with 93.5% accuracy, 96.77% sensitivity, 90.3% specificity, and 0.98% AUC in the differentiation of LGGs and HGGs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed method can identify LGG and HGG with 93.5% accuracy, 96.77% sensitivity, 90.3% specificity, and 0.98% AUC, leading to the best treatment for glioma patients by using CT scans based on radiomics analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":38035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","volume":"14 2","pages":"151-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2306-1628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gliomas, as Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors, are greatly common with 80% of malignancy. Treatment methods for gliomas, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy depend on the grade, size, location, and the patient's age.

Objective: This study aimed to quantify glioma based on the radiomics analysis and classify its grade into High-grade Glioma (HGG) or Low-grade Glioma (LGG) by various machine-learning methods using contrast-enhanced brain Computerized Tomography (CT) scans.

Material and methods: This retrospective study involved acquiring and segmenting data, selecting and extracting features, classifying, analyzing, and evaluating classifiers. The study included a total of 62 patients (31 with LGG and 31 with HGG). The tumors were segmented by an experienced CT-scan technologist with 3D slicer software. A total of 14 shape features, 18 histogram-based features, and 75 texture-based features were computed. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) were used to evaluate and compare classification models.

Results: A total of 13 out of 107 features were selected to differentiate between LGGs and HGGs and to perform various classifier algorithms with different cross-validations. The best classifier algorithm was linear-discriminant with 93.5% accuracy, 96.77% sensitivity, 90.3% specificity, and 0.98% AUC in the differentiation of LGGs and HGGs.

Conclusion: The proposed method can identify LGG and HGG with 93.5% accuracy, 96.77% sensitivity, 90.3% specificity, and 0.98% AUC, leading to the best treatment for glioma patients by using CT scans based on radiomics analysis.

通过对比增强 CT 放射组学特征对胶质瘤进行分级。
背景:神经胶质瘤是中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤中的常见病,占恶性肿瘤的80%。胶质瘤的治疗方法,如手术、放疗和化疗,取决于胶质瘤的分级、大小、位置和患者的年龄:本研究旨在通过对比增强脑部计算机断层扫描(CT),基于放射组学分析对胶质瘤进行量化,并通过各种机器学习方法将其分级为高级别胶质瘤(HGG)或低级别胶质瘤(LGG):这项回顾性研究包括获取和分割数据、选择和提取特征、分类、分析和评估分类器。研究共包括 62 名患者(31 名 LGG 患者和 31 名 HGG 患者)。肿瘤由一名经验丰富的 CT 扫描技术专家使用三维切片软件进行分割。共计算出 14 个形状特征、18 个直方图特征和 75 个纹理特征。采用曲线下面积(AUC)和接收者工作特征曲线(ROC)对分类模型进行评估和比较:结果:在 107 个特征中,共选择了 13 个特征来区分 LGGs 和 HGGs,并使用不同的交叉验证来执行各种分类算法。最佳分类算法是线性判别法,在区分LGGs和HGGs方面的准确率为93.5%,灵敏度为96.77%,特异性为90.3%,AUC为0.98%:结论:所提出的方法能以 93.5% 的准确率、96.77% 的灵敏度、90.3% 的特异性和 0.98% 的 AUC 识别 LGG 和 HGG,从而在放射组学分析的基础上利用 CT 扫描为胶质瘤患者提供最佳治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering (JBPE) is a bimonthly peer-reviewed English-language journal that publishes high-quality basic sciences and clinical research (experimental or theoretical) broadly concerned with the relationship of physics to medicine and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信